Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 56, Issue 23, 231202(2019)

Analysis and Verification of Position Error of Reticle Stage Based on Planar Grating

Chunxiao Hao1,*... Wentao Zhang1,2, Xianying Wang2 and Xunzhi Huang2 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Electronic Engineering and Automation, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China
  • 2Shanghai Micro Electronics Equipment (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201203, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Schematic of measurement optical paths of planar grating and laser interferometer
    Installation layout of planar grating and laser interferometer of reticle stage
    Analytical diagrams of model errors. (a) Abbe error; (b) cosine error
    Error analysis diagrams of degree of freedom Rx with respect to degree of freedom in y direction
    Error analysis diagrams of degree of freedom Rz with respect to degree of freedom in y direction
    Error analysis diagrams of degree of freedom Ry with respect to degree of freedom in y direction
    Error analysis diagrams of degree of freedom Rz with respect to degree of freedom in y direction
    Error analysis diagrams of degrees of freedom y and Rx with respect to degree of freedom in y direction
    Simulation results of Y-direction coupling coefficient. (a) First-order coupling coefficient; (b) high-order coupling coefficient
    Experimental system for reticle stage measurement
    • Table 1. Ranges of degree of freedom of reticle stage

      View table

      Table 1. Ranges of degree of freedom of reticle stage

      Degree of freedomRangeStep
      X1.6 mm5
      Y240 mm3
      Rz1. 6 mrad3
    • Table 2. Coupling coefficients of three degrees of freedom of planar grating

      View table

      Table 2. Coupling coefficients of three degrees of freedom of planar grating

      Degree of freedom coefficient /(mm·mrad-1)123
      ξRx2x-0.381-0.365-0.367
      ξRy2x-55.667-55.653-55.496
      ξRz2x-22.860-22.843-22.849
      ζRy.y2x-0.128-0.090-0.115
      ξRx2y43.85343.85043.834
      ξRy2y3.9433.9223.924
      ξRz2y-7.063-7.049-7.069
      ζRx.y2y-14.843-14.758-14.764
      ξRz2Rx1.6361.7731.773
      ξRz2Ry0.6070.6820.682
      ξRz2x3.6223.9653.965
      ζRx.y2Rx-2.966-4.096-4.096
    • Table 3. Comparison of position accuracy between laser interferometer and planar gratingmm

      View table

      Table 3. Comparison of position accuracy between laser interferometer and planar gratingmm

      InstrumentPhysical location3σ
      -120-60060120
      Laser interferometer-119.999-59.999-1.04485×10-760.000094120.0000921. 818×10-4
      Planar grating 1-120.000009-59.999998-4.811×10-660.000013120.0000043. 812×10-6
      Planar grating 2-120.000003-60.2312021-1.316×10-560.000006120.0000033. 897×10-5
      Planar grating 3-120.2312021-60.2312021-1.429×10-760.000001120.23120214. 892×10-6
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Chunxiao Hao, Wentao Zhang, Xianying Wang, Xunzhi Huang. Analysis and Verification of Position Error of Reticle Stage Based on Planar Grating[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(23): 231202

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

    Received: Mar. 26, 2019

    Accepted: Jun. 24, 2019

    Published Online: Nov. 27, 2019

    The Author Email: Hao Chunxiao (glietzwt@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP56.231202

    Topics