Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 42, Issue 11, 1134006(2022)

Effect of Optics Contamination on X-ray Free-Electron Laser Beam Quality

Yajun Tong1、*, Fang Liu1, Jiadong Fan1, Limin Jin2, Xiaohao Dong2, Xiaojiang Yu3, Huaidong Jiang1, and Zhi Liu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Transformative Science, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
  • 2Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201204, China
  • 3Singapore Synchrotron Light Source, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117603, Singapore
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(19)
    Brightness comparison of different light sources[12]
    Effect of carbon contamination in soft X-ray range. (a) Reflectivity curves under different carbon contamination thicknesses and grazing angles; (b) reflectivity curves of carbon contamination with different roughness
    Effect of carbon contamination in hard X-ray range. (a) Reflectivity curves under different carbon contamination thicknesses; (b) reflectivity curves of carbon contamination with different roughness
    Reflectivity curves of B4C coating layer and carbon contamination layer at same grazing angle in soft X-ray band and hard X-ray range
    Carbon contamination of KB mirror at LCLS AMO end station[24]
    Atomic force microscope scanning images of nanodots generated by FLASH optics irradiated by free-electron laser[25]. (a) Scanning area size is 2 μm×2 μm; (b) scanning area size is 10 μm×10 μm
    Reflectivity curves of carbon contamination of B4C under different roughness in hard X-ray range and soft X-ray range. (a) Hard X-ray range; (b) soft X-ray range
    SR varying with height error
    Damage threshold and absorbed dose of different material particles
    Analysis of melting situation of different material particle contamination. (a) Power density at 1 MHz; (b) temperature at 10 kHz
    Schematic diagram of circular particle blocking
    Effect of particle blocking. (a) Blocking effect of particles with diameter of 50 μm in beam with full width at half maximum of 250 μm; (b) transmission change directly caused by blocking of particles with different sizes
    Effect of beam propagation after 100 m under situation of particle with diameter of 50 μm on optics. (a) Two-dimensional beam distribution; (b) profile of beam
    Speckle enhancement of beam propagation after 3.5 m under situation of particle with diameter of 50 μm on optics. (a) Two-dimensional beam distribution; (b) profile of beam
    Effect of beam propagation at different distances under situation of 100 particles with diameter of 5 μm on optics. (a) Two-dimensional beam distribution after 1.5 m propagation; (b) profile of beam after 1.5 m propagation; (c) two-dimensional beam distribution after 100 m propagation; (d) profile of beam after 100 m propagation
    Spot distribution and profile at focal position under situations of no particles and 100 particles with diameter of 5 μm on optics. (a) Spot distribution at focal position under situation of 100 particles with diameter of 5 μm on optics; (b) profile at focal position under situation of 100 particles with diameter of 5 μm on optics; (c) spot distribution at focal position under situation of no particles on optics; (d) profile at focal position under situation of no particles on optics
    Effect of particle contamination on spot before and after cleaning at SACLA[38]. (a) Spot under situation of particle contamination; (b) spot after ultrasonic cleaning
    • Table 1. Reflectivity improvement results of KB mirror after cleaning at LCLS AMO end station[23]

      View table

      Table 1. Reflectivity improvement results of KB mirror after cleaning at LCLS AMO end station[23]

      Photon energy /eV35055010001560
      Reflectivity improvement /%511977167
    • Table 2. Source parameters used in single-pulse damage calculation

      View table

      Table 2. Source parameters used in single-pulse damage calculation

      Energy /keV0.20.40.92.03.07.012.415.020.025.0
      Divergence /μrad28.214.711.66.34.52.51.71.31.31.3
      Pulse energy /mJ2.02.02.02.02.02.00.50.50.30.3
      Position /m150150150150150228228228270270
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yajun Tong, Fang Liu, Jiadong Fan, Limin Jin, Xiaohao Dong, Xiaojiang Yu, Huaidong Jiang, Zhi Liu. Effect of Optics Contamination on X-ray Free-Electron Laser Beam Quality[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(11): 1134006

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: X-Ray Optics

    Received: Apr. 2, 2022

    Accepted: May. 6, 2022

    Published Online: Jun. 3, 2022

    The Author Email: Tong Yajun (tongyj@shanghaitech.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS202242.1134006

    Topics