Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 45, Issue 4, 404002(2018)
Analysis on the Accuracy of Flat Sub-Aperture Stitching Interferometry
Fig. 4. Stitching error distribution of W1、W2、W3. (a) Difference between W1,W2,W3 and W0; (b) difference between W1, W2, W3 each other
Fig. 5. Stitching error results of surfaces constructed with different Zernike polynomials
Fig. 7. (a) Overlap area in adjacent sub-apertures and its corresponding (b) reference surface error
Fig. 8. Stitching results of different Zernike aberrations. (a) Z4; (b) Z6; (c) Z10; (d) Z16
Fig. 10. Stitching coefficient error of different sub-apertures under random noise. (a) Sub2; (b) Sub3
Fig. 11. Stitching error of the random noise of different standard deviations. (a) Standard deviations between 0-1; (b) standard deviation of 0.1
Fig. 12. High order noise during the subaperture measurements. (a) Difference between the second and the first measurements;(b) difference between the third and the second measurements; (c) difference between the forth and the third measurements; (d) difference between the fifth and the forth measurements
Fig. 14. Stitching measurement results of the 450 mm×60 mm flat mirror surface. (a) 15 sub-apertures with double sub-aperture stitching algorithm; (b) 8 sub-apertures with double sub-aperture stitching algorithm; (c) 15 sub-apertures with error averaging stitching algorithm; (d) 15 sub-apertures with double sub-aperture stitching algorithm after removing the high order errors of reference surface; (e) 15 sub-apertures with double sub-aperture stitching algorithm after removing the second order errors of
|
|
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Lu Yunjun, Tang Feng, Wang Xiangzhao, Guo Fudong. Analysis on the Accuracy of Flat Sub-Aperture Stitching Interferometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2018, 45(4): 404002
Category: Measurement and metrology
Received: Sep. 7, 2017
Accepted: --
Published Online: Apr. 13, 2018
The Author Email: Yunjun Lu (luyj@siom.ac.cn)