Chinese Journal of Ship Research, Volume. 17, Issue 2, 98(2022)

Accurate track control of unmanned underwater vehicle under complex disturbances

Haohua CHEN1, Hong ZHAO1, Ning WANG1,2, Chen GUO1, Ting LU1, and Ning WANG1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Marine Electrical Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
  • 2College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(25)
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    • Table 1. Performance comparison of three methods

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Performance comparison of three methods

      性能指标FDO-NTSMCBSMCNTSMC
      IAE$ {x_{\text{e}}} $0.462 71.061 01.265 8
      $ {y_{\text{e}}} $0.356 20.766 61.603 3
      $ {z_{\text{e}}} $0.395 60.528 42.460 3
      $ {\theta _{\text{e}}} $1.593 22.050 12.326 6
      $ {\psi _{\text{e}}} $2.656 42.848 24.142 3
      ITAE$ {x_{\text{e}}} $0.561 224.282 733.159 9
      $ {y_{\text{e}}} $0.292 611.964 851.427 9
      $ {z_{\text{e}}} $0.460 67.384 680.571 9
      $ {\theta _{\text{e}}} $1.779 816.042 016.232 8
      $ {\psi _{\text{e}}} $3.749 617.936 639.832 9
    • Table 2. Performance comparison of three methods under step perturbation

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Performance comparison of three methods under step perturbation

      性能指标FDO-NTSMCBSMCNTSMC
      IAE$ {x_{\text{e}}} $0.626 51.718 25.916 2
      $ {y_{\text{e}}} $0.513 51.456 36.499 6
      $ {z_{\text{e}}} $0.555 31.234 47.711 7
      $ {\theta _{\text{e}}} $1.740 62.576 45.167 5
      $ {\psi _{\text{e}}} $2.820 23.520 08.959 2
      ITAE$ {x_{\text{e}}} $6.568 848.180 9203.403 5
      $ {y_{\text{e}}} $5.986 037.016 3231.457 9
      $ {z_{\text{e}}} $6.288 333.114 5272.619 8
      $ {\theta _{\text{e}}} $7.129 935.028 385.621 4
      $ {\psi _{\text{e}}} $9.733 642.372 9213.641 1
    • Table 3. Performance comparison of three methods under the condition of limiting amplitude of control input

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Performance comparison of three methods under the condition of limiting amplitude of control input

      性能指标FDO-NTSMCBSMCNTSMC
      IAE$ {x_{\text{e}}} $0.466 30.940 91.767 4
      $ {y_{\text{e}}} $0.381 30.815 42.326 4
      $ {z_{\text{e}}} $0.437 50.641 13.513 0
      $ {\theta _{\text{e}}} $1.593 22.050 13.422 3
      $ {\psi _{\text{e}}} $1.994 51.690 23.192 1
      ITAE$ {x_{\text{e}}} $0.567 219.343 252.946 8
      $ {y_{\text{e}}} $0.322 011.429 880.644 2
      $ {z_{\text{e}}} $0.528 27.112 8119.339 1
      $ {\theta _{\text{e}}} $1.779 816.042 023.617 4
      $ {\psi _{\text{e}}} $2.423 614.800 656.396 3
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Haohua CHEN, Hong ZHAO, Ning WANG, Chen GUO, Ting LU, Ning WANG. Accurate track control of unmanned underwater vehicle under complex disturbances[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2022, 17(2): 98

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Ship Design and Performance

    Received: Dec. 23, 2020

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Mar. 24, 2025

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02236

    Topics