Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 61, Issue 9, 0923002(2024)

Parameter Identification of the MEMS Micromirror Model Based on Improved Least Squares Method

Zirui Wang1,2,3, Zhihui Feng1,2,3、*, Ming Lei1,2,3, and Ze Wu1,2,3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610209, Sichuan, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Space Optoelectronic Precision Measurement, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610209, Sichuan, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(11)
    Physical picture of the MEMS micromirror
    Experimental plan
    Experimental schematic
    Input and output signal of the micromirror in the open-loop state. (a) Input signal; (b) output signal
    Size of the correction gain matrix K in the identification process of the traditional recursive least squares algorithm.(a) Ka1; (b) Ka2; (c) Kb1; (d) Kb2
    Size of the correction gain matrix K in the identification process of the proposed algorithm. (a) Ka1; (b) Ka2; (c) Kb1; (d) Kb2
    Convergence procedure of the estimated parameter identification of the traditional recursive least squares algorithm.(a) a1; (b) a2; (c) b1; (d) b2
    Convergence procedure of the estimated parameter identification of the proposed algorithm. (a) a1; (b) a2; (c) b1; (d) b2
    • Table 1. Simulation results of parameter identification

      View table

      Table 1. Simulation results of parameter identification

      Parametera1a2b1b2
      Actual value1.53580.78121.00000.5562
      Improved algorithm1.53370.78200.99980.5558
      Traditional algorithm1.51730.76190.99880.5397
    • Table 2. Parameters of the MEMS micromirror

      View table

      Table 2. Parameters of the MEMS micromirror

      ParameterValue
      Effective mirror size /mm6
      Optical scanning angle /[(°)×(°)]30×20
      Working frequencyFast axis 1.2 kHz,slow axis 0‒800 Hz
      Working voltage /V±3
    • Table 3. Comparison of model validation errors between the improved algorithm and the traditional recursive least squares algorithm

      View table

      Table 3. Comparison of model validation errors between the improved algorithm and the traditional recursive least squares algorithm

      AlgorithmRMSE
      30 Hz60 Hz90 Hz130 Hz
      Improved algorithm0.011220.011250.011310.01189
      Traditional algorithm0.012280.012500.012600.01291
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Zirui Wang, Zhihui Feng, Ming Lei, Ze Wu. Parameter Identification of the MEMS Micromirror Model Based on Improved Least Squares Method[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(9): 0923002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Optical Devices

    Received: Jan. 5, 2023

    Accepted: Mar. 7, 2023

    Published Online: May. 10, 2024

    The Author Email: Zhihui Feng (fengzh@ioe.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP223403

    CSTR:32186.14.LOP223403

    Topics