High Power Laser and Particle Beams, Volume. 33, Issue 6, 065011(2021)

Numerical study of atmospheric pressure Ar plasma jets under different electrode structures

Yuanyuan Jiang, Yanhui Wang, Caihui Gao, and Dezhen Wang
Author Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory of Materials Modification by Laser, Ion and Electron Beams (Ministry of Education), School of Physics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(15)
    Discharge device and simulation domain used in our calculation
    Calculation results of the neutral gas flow
    Temporal and spatial evolution of electron density for the first and the second electrode device
    Radial and axial electron density evolutions for different electrode device
    Evolution of the axial and radial electric field in the ionization head when the ionization wave propagates inside the tube for different electrode device
    Evolution of the axial and radial electric field in the ionization head when the ionization wave propagates outside the tube for different electrode device
    Spatial distribution of reactive species density at 50 ns for two electrode devices
    Evolution reactive species density on the axis for two electrode devices
    Temporal-spatial evolution of electron density for bare needle electrode device
    Axial electron density evolution for the bare needle electrode device
    Evolution of the electric field during the propagation of the ionization wave under the bare needle electrode device
    Axial plasma potential distribution at different moments for the bare needle electrode (solid line) and needle electrode with insulation dielectric (dashed line)
    • Table 1. [in Chinese]

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. [in Chinese]

      boundaryvelocity conditionbackground species condition
      Note: ${u_{{r}}}$ and ${u_{ {\textit{z}} } }$ are the velocity in the axial and radial directions, respectively. ${{n}}$ is the unit vector pointing toward the boundary.
      BC
      BJ,CI,IH,HD,GF
      DE
      KG
      EF0.1 MPa
    • Table 2. [in Chinese]

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. [in Chinese]

      boundaryelectrostatic conditionspecies condition
      Note: “ring” is the high voltage electrode.
      BC
      BJ, CIHDEq.(13)Eq.(8), (9), (10), (11)
      KG
      AKV
      GF0——
      EF0
      ring0——
    • Table 3. [in Chinese]

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. [in Chinese]

      indexreactionrate coefficientsthreshold energy/eVreference
      1e+Ar→e+ArBOLSIG+/[17]
      2e+Ar→e+Ar*BOLSIG+11.5[17]
      3e+Ar→2e+Ar+BOLSIG+15.8[17]
      4e+N2→2e+N2+BOLSIG+15.58[17]
      5e+N2→e+2N BOLSIG+13[17]
      6e+N2→e+N2(C3π) BOLSIG+11.03[17]
      7e+O2→2e+O2+BOLSIG+12.06[17]
      8e+O2→e+2O BOLSIG+5.58[17]
      9e+O2→O2BOLSIG+/[17]
      10Ar*+Ar*→e+Ar+Ar+6.4×10−16 (m−3/s) /[17]
      11Ar*+Ar→Ar+Ar 2.09×10−21 (m−3/s) /[17]
      12Ar*+N2→Ar+2N 3.6×10−17 (m−3/s) /[17]
      13Ar*+O2→Ar+2O 2.1×10−16 (m−3/s) /[17]
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yuanyuan Jiang, Yanhui Wang, Caihui Gao, Dezhen Wang. Numerical study of atmospheric pressure Ar plasma jets under different electrode structures[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33(6): 065011

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Plasma and Its Application Technology

    Received: Apr. 16, 2021

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Jul. 22, 2021

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.11884/HPLPB202133.210148

    Topics