High Power Laser and Particle Beams, Volume. 35, Issue 9, 091002(2023)

Error-sensitive factors analysis and verification for optical element in-situ measurement device based on phase measuring deflectometry

Shanshan Wang1, Feng Shi2、*, Shuo Qiao2, Bowen Xu1, Qun Hao1,3, Ci Song2, Guipeng Tie2, Ye Tian2, Dede Zhai2, and Xing Peng2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Beijing Key Laboratory for Precision Optoelectronic Measurement Instrument and Technology, School of Optics and Photonics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • 2College of Intelligence Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
  • 3School of Opto-Electronic Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(22)
    Data transmission flow chart
    Edge ray tracing of Zemax
    Different k values correspond to the measurement surface shape error
    The surface shape errors corresponding to different k values
    Schematic diagram of the influence of image generator positioning error along Z axis
    De-skewed surface shape error caused by the image generator offsetting 0.01 mm along the positive direction of Z axis
    Surface shape error caused by image generator’s offset along the Z axis direction
    Zernike coefficients corresponding to surface shape error
    Size of the surface shape error caused by the offset along the Z axis
    Zernike coefficients corresponding to surface shape error
    Schematic diagram of the change of sampling points when k1 > 0 and k1 < 0
    k1>0, slope and surface shape error caused by detector lens distortion
    Surface shape error caused by lens distortion of detector
    Zernike coefficients corresponding to surface shape error
    In-situ detection system structure
    Change of measurement results with time
    Measurement results of surface shape error and temperature variation with time
    • Table 1. Influence of image generator’s positioning error on the measurement results

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Influence of image generator’s positioning error on the measurement results

      directionmaximum surface shape error/nmcorresponding to Zernike coefficients
      PVRMSnumber of termsnumber of main itemsmain types
      along the X axis 77.210.12、5、8、15545° primary astigmatism
      along the Y axis 88.918.13、4、6、7、94、6defocusing and 0° primary astigmatism
      along the Z axis 152.730.63、4、6、74、6defocusing and 0° primary astigmatism
    • Table 2. Effect of pinhole diaphragm positioning error on measurement results

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Effect of pinhole diaphragm positioning error on measurement results

      directionmaximum surface shape error/nmcorresponding to Zernike coefficients
      PVRMSnumber of termsnumber of main itemsmain types
      along the X axis 81.810.82、5、8、15545° primary astigmatism
      along the Y axis 94.219.13、4、6、7、94、6defocusing and 0° primary astigmatism
      along the Z axis 161.932.43、4、6、74、6defocusing and 0° primary astigmatism
    • Table 3. Effect of detector lens distortion on measurement results

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Effect of detector lens distortion on measurement results

      influencing factormaximum surface shape error/nm corresponding to Zernike coefficients
      PVRMSnumber of terms number of main items main types
      detector lens distortion (|k1|=1×10−3) pin-cushion distortion155.324.93、4、6、11、12、284、6、11、12defocusing, 0° primary astigmatism and higher-order aberrations
      barrel distortion155.324.93、4、6、11、12、284、6、11、12defocusing, 0° primary astigmatism and higher-order aberrations
    • Table 4. Effect of temperature change on measurement results

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Effect of temperature change on measurement results

      influencing factormaximum surface shape error/nmcorresponding to Zernike coefficients
      PVRMSnumber of terms number of main items main types
      image generator expansion416.985.33、4、5、6、73、4、5defocusing, 45° primary astigmatism, 0° primary astigmatism
      detector expansion99.720.43、4、6、74focusing out
      support structure expansion4.91.03、4、6、7、94、6defocusing and 0° primary astigmatism
    • Table 5. Detection system parameters

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Detection system parameters

      measurement serial numberPV/nmRMS/nmmeasurement serial numberPV/nmRMS/nm
      119.23.11646.69.6
      218.42.91746.79.6
      321.74.01847.710.0
      428.35.41949.310.3
      529.74.82044.99.3
      627.75.22142.68.8
      733.76.62245.59.5
      834.46.62343.58.7
      931.35.92441.77.3
      1034.36.62541.36.6
      1137.47.12650.19.0
      1240.58.12760.610.9
      1344.59.32845.79.0
      1448.210.02937.66.3
      1548.110.13039.97.1
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Shanshan Wang, Feng Shi, Shuo Qiao, Bowen Xu, Qun Hao, Ci Song, Guipeng Tie, Ye Tian, Dede Zhai, Xing Peng. Error-sensitive factors analysis and verification for optical element in-situ measurement device based on phase measuring deflectometry[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2023, 35(9): 091002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Laser Damage of Optical Elements

    Received: Nov. 30, 2022

    Accepted: May. 27, 2023

    Published Online: Oct. 17, 2023

    The Author Email: Shi Feng (shifeng@nudt.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.11884/HPLPB202335.220405

    Topics