Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 60, Issue 5, 0525001(2023)

Ultra-Short-Term Forecasting Method for Photovoltaic Power Based on Singular Spectrum Decomposition and Double Attention Mechanism

Xue Dong1,2,3, Shengxiao Zhao1,2, Yanyan Lu1,2, Xiaofeng Chen1,2, Yan Zhao1,2, and Lei Liu3、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Far-Shore Wind Power Technology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 311122, Zhejiang, China
  • 2Power China Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited, Hangzhou 311122, Zhejiang, China
  • 3School of Engineering Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(11)
    Structure of feature-temporal attention (FT-Attention)
    Flow chart of ultra-short-term photovoltaic power forecasting method
    SSD results of original signals
    Forecasting results obtained by ablation models
    Forecasting results obtained by different methods
    Forecasting results under different weather types
    • Table 1. Pearson coefficients between time-delayed features and photovoltaic power

      View table

      Table 1. Pearson coefficients between time-delayed features and photovoltaic power

      Variablet-1t-2t-3t-4t-5t-6t-7
      Historical power0.9820.9610.9330.8990.8580.8120.761
      Solar irradiance0.9690.9470.9200.8870.8470.8020.752
    • Table 2. Performance comparison of ablation experiments

      View table

      Table 2. Performance comparison of ablation experiments

      ModelNMSENRMSEMAPE
      BiGRU3.70%5.80%10.62%
      SSD+BiGRU3.01%5.22%9.23%
      Proposed2.57%4.82%8.14%
    • Table 3. Performance comparison with other methods

      View table

      Table 3. Performance comparison with other methods

      MethodNMAENRMSEMAPER2Pearson
      SVR4.67%6.03%10.68%0.9490.979
      BPNN4.15%6.31%12.81%0.9440.972
      LSTM4.06%6.24%11.68%0.9460.972
      GRU3.89%6.03%11.55%0.9490.974
      Proposed2.57%4.82%8.14%0.9680.984
    • Table 4. Performance comparison results in different seasons

      View table

      Table 4. Performance comparison results in different seasons

      SeasonMethodNMAENRMSEMAPER2Pearson
      SpringSVR4.916.2411.130.9480.978
      BPNN4.376.4812.790.9430.972
      LSTM4.326.4512.060.9440.972
      GRU4.206.3612.030.9450.973
      Proposed2.925.288.740.9620.981
      SummerSVR5.297.1913.500.9070.958
      BPNN5.097.9316.910.8860.942
      LSTM5.368.2817.050.8760.936
      GRU4.987.8316.050.8890.944
      Proposed3.686.4312.580.9250.962
      AutumnSVR4.716.1411.620.9440.977
      BPNN4.216.4813.930.9380.969
      LSTM4.336.6613.680.9340.967
      GRU4.146.4213.340.9390.970
      Proposed2.835.179.900.9600.980
      WinterSVR4.415.2110.520.9460.985
      BPNN3.325.1415.520.9480.974
      LSTM3.224.8212.780.9540.977
      GRU2.874.7112.880.9560.978
      Proposed1.843.498.790.9760.988
    • Table 5. Performance comparison under different weather types

      View table

      Table 5. Performance comparison under different weather types

      MethodSunny dayRainy dayAbrupt change
      NMAENRMSEMAPENMAENRMSEMAPENMAENRMSEMAPE
      SVR3.91%5.03%7.61%4.67%5.15%19.31%5.58%7.51%15.20%
      BPNN3.44%5.38%8.60%2.61%3.90%34.36%5.50%8.26%18.74%
      LSTM3.03%4.73%7.01%3.01%4.30%31.05%5.63%8.47%18.51%
      GRU2.99%4.76%6.95%2.42%3.81%31.44%5.33%8.06%17.80%
      Proposed1.59%3.50%3.81%1.66%2.78%20.86%3.95%6.69%14.18%
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xue Dong, Shengxiao Zhao, Yanyan Lu, Xiaofeng Chen, Yan Zhao, Lei Liu. Ultra-Short-Term Forecasting Method for Photovoltaic Power Based on Singular Spectrum Decomposition and Double Attention Mechanism[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(5): 0525001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: OPTOELECTRONICS

    Received: Dec. 24, 2021

    Accepted: Feb. 25, 2022

    Published Online: Mar. 6, 2023

    The Author Email: Lei Liu (liulei13@ustc.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP213335

    Topics