Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 50, Issue 1, 0113017(2023)

Thermal Conductivity of Electrically Biased Few-Layer Suspended Graphene Devices Measured by Raman Spectroscopy

Ziru Cui1,2, Siyu Zhou1,2, Yang Xiao1, Yucheng Zhang1, Chucai Guo1,2, Ken Liu1,2, Fang Luo1,2、*, and Mengjian Zhu1,2、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, Hunan, China
  • 2Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Novel Nano-Optoelectronic Information Materials and Devices, Changsha 410073, Hunan, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(7)
    Schematic of suspended graphene device and characterization test. (a) Schematic of device structure and Raman spectrum measurement of thermal conductivity; (b) SEM image of suspended graphene device; (c) Raman spectrum of few layer suspended graphene (FLG); (d) field effect curve of FLG transistor
    Variable temperature Raman spectra of graphene and frequency changes of G peak and 2D peak. (a) Variable temperature Raman spectra of FLG at 100-400 K; (b) graphene G peak frequency at different temperatures and calculated first-order temperature coefficient χG; (c) graphene 2D peak frequency at different temperatures and calculated first-order temperature coefficient χ2D
    Raman spectrum of G peak of FLG at zero bias voltage and shift of G peak frequency with laser power. (a) Raman spectra of G peak of FLG at two laser powers; (b) change of G peak frequency of FLG with laser power
    Relationship between G peak frequency of FLG and laser power under different bias voltages
    Relationship between temperature of FLG and bias voltage or thermal conductivity obtained by experiment and calculation. (a) Relationship between temperature and bias voltage; (b) relationship between thermal conductivity and temperature
    • Table 1. Calculated thermal conductivity and temperature of FLG under different bias voltages according to Raman G peak frequency variation

      View table

      Table 1. Calculated thermal conductivity and temperature of FLG under different bias voltages according to Raman G peak frequency variation

      Vb /Vκ/(W·m-1·K-1ΔT /KT /K
      02895.50300
      0.62798.4211511
      0.83017.5227527
      1.02390.0321621
      1.32690.5416716
      1.42722.3463763
      1.52656.1479779
    • Table 2. Comparison on thermal conductivity of graphene

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison on thermal conductivity of graphene

      Measurement methodPreparation methodQuantity of graphene layer

      Thermal conductivity /

      (W·m-1·K-1

      Raman spectroscopyMechanical exfoliation114840-5300
      Mechanical exfoliation3213080-5150
      Mechanical exfoliation291~1800
      Chemical vapor deposition611450-3600
      Chemical vapor deposition3012600-3100
      Mechanical exfoliation (ours)4-52390-3000 (electrical bias)
      Thermal analysis methodMechanical exfoliation and chemical vapor deposition331~310 (electrical bias)
      Microfabricated suspended heater devices methodMechanical exfoliation352~600
      Mechanical exfoliation3411689-1813
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Ziru Cui, Siyu Zhou, Yang Xiao, Yucheng Zhang, Chucai Guo, Ken Liu, Fang Luo, Mengjian Zhu. Thermal Conductivity of Electrically Biased Few-Layer Suspended Graphene Devices Measured by Raman Spectroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2023, 50(1): 0113017

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: micro and nano optics

    Received: Aug. 10, 2022

    Accepted: Nov. 11, 2022

    Published Online: Jan. 13, 2023

    The Author Email: Luo Fang (luofang@nudt.edu.cn), Zhu Mengjian (zhumengjian11@ nudt.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL221128

    Topics