Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 48, Issue 15, 1507001(2021)

Speed-of-Sound Heterogeneity Compensation Method in Photoacoustic Computed Tomographic Image Reconstruction

Kexin Deng1、**, Manxiu Cui2, Hongzhi Zuo2, Xuanhao Wang2, Chuangjian Cai2, Jianwen Luo1、***, and Cheng Ma2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100086
  • 2Department of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100086
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(8)
    Ring-array PACT system[31]
    Experimental results of liver tumor mouse model[31]. (a) Dissected liver with tumor, and arrow points to tumor; (b) PACT result of liver tumor mouse, and arrow points to feeding vessel of tumor; (c) HE staining result of section, and dashed and solid arrows point to normal and tumor regions, respectively; (d) reconstructed result of SoS distribution corresponding to Fig. 2(b). Scale bars: (a)(b)(d) 5 mm; (c) 40 μm
    Numerical simulation results[53]. (a) Reconstructed IP image by dual-SoS method; (b) reconstructed IP image by conventional FC method; (c) reconstructed IP image by MSFC method; (d) gold standard SoS distribution by the numerical simulation; (e) reconstructed SoS distribution by FC method; (f) reconstructed SoS distribution by MSFC method
    Flow chart of APACT method
    In vivo imaging results(scale bar: 1 mm)[64]. (a) IP image reconstructed by conventional DAS method; (b) IP image reconstructed by APACT method; enlarged results of areas in dotted and solid lines in (c) Fig.5 (a) and (d) Fig.5 (b), respectively; (e) extracted wavefront distortion based on region with relative fitting residual below 70%; (f) recovered SoS distribution
    Comparison between FC method and APACT method(scale bar: 1 mm)[64]. (a) IP image reconstructed by FC method with prior knowledge; (b) IP image reconstructed by FC method without prior knowledge; (c) IP image reconstructed by APACT method; (d) in vivo IP image reconstructed by FC method; (e) SoS distribution corresponding to Fig. 6 (a); (f) SoS distribution corresponding to Fig. 6 (b); (g) SoS distribution corresponding to Fig. 6 (c); (h) in vivo IP image reconstructed by APACT method
    Diagrams of SC method, and all images are obtained by numerical simulation. (a) IP reconstructed by SC method; (b) left column is IP reconstruction results of area in dashed box in Fig. 7 (a), center column is Fourier transform results of left column, right column is results of converting results in center column to polar coordinate; (c) energy distribution of signal, and dots indicate minima; (d) gold standard SoS distribution; (e) SoS distribution estimated by SC method; scale bars: (a) (d) (e) 5 mm
    • Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of various methods

      View table

      Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of various methods

      PerformanceDual-SoSPassive elementModel-basedFC/MSFCAPACTSC
      RobustnessHighHighVery lowNormalNormalNormal
      ComputationLowNormalVery highHighVery highNormal
      Image qualityLowHighNormalNormalNormalNormal
      Imaging timeLowHighLowLowLowLow
      System complexityLowVery highLowLowLowLow
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Kexin Deng, Manxiu Cui, Hongzhi Zuo, Xuanhao Wang, Chuangjian Cai, Jianwen Luo, Cheng Ma. Speed-of-Sound Heterogeneity Compensation Method in Photoacoustic Computed Tomographic Image Reconstruction[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(15): 1507001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: biomedical photonics and laser medicine

    Received: Apr. 7, 2021

    Accepted: May. 20, 2021

    Published Online: Aug. 12, 2021

    The Author Email: Kexin Deng (dkx17@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn), Jianwen Luo (jianwen_luo@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn), Cheng Ma (cheng_ma@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL202148.1507001

    Topics