[1] J Alcamo, M Moreno J, B Nováky et al. Europe: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group ii to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Parry M L, Canziani O F, Palutikof, 4, 541-580(2007).

[2] М Antonov А. Comparison of indices of wood macrostructure in natural and artificial Pinus sylvestris forests. Ecological Problems of the North, 10, 15-16(2007).

[3] L Baskerville G. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2, 49-53(1972).

[4] T Berner L, A Beck P S, G Bunn A et al. Plant response to climate change along the forest-tundra ecotone in northeastern Siberia. Global Change Biology, 19, 3449-3462(2013).

[5] B Bond-Lamberty, C Wang, T Gower S. Aboveground and belowground biomass and sapwood area allometric equations for six boreal tree species of northern Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32, 1441-1450(2002).

[6] O Bouriaud, N Bréda, L Dupouey J et al. Is ring width a reliable proxy for stem-biomass increment? A case study in European beech. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35, 2920-2933(2005).

[7] G Brockerhoff E, H Jactel, A Parrotta J et al. Plantation forests and biodiversity: Oxymoron or opportunity?. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 925-951(2008).

[8] M Carrer, C Urbinati. Age-dependent tree-ring growth responses to climate in Larix decidua and Pinus cembra. Ecology, 85, 730-740(2004).

[9] N Chernov N. On a ratio of natural and artificial reforestation in the Urals. Forests of the Urals and Their Management, 21, 210-219(2001).

[10] D Chernyshev V. Pathways of physiological and energetic adaptations of conifers under extreme conditions. In: Biological problems of the North: Abstract VI symp. Yakutsk: Institute of Biology, Yakutsk. Fil. Sib. Otd., 5, 13-17(1974).

[11] M Danchenko A, A Frickel Y, I Verzunov A. The formation of artificial young stands of white birch.. Tomsk, Tomsk Scientific Center:, 199(1991).

[12] L DeLeo V, L Menge D N, M Hanks E et al. Effects of two centuries of global environmental variation on phenology and physiology of Arabidopsis thaliana. Global Change Biology, 26, 523-538(2020).

[13] A Denney D, T Anderson J. Natural history collections document biological responses to climate change: A commentary on DeLeo et al., 2020, Effects of two centuries of global environmental variation on phenology and physiology of Arabidopsis thaliana. Global Change Biology, 26, 340-342(2020).

[14] A Detlaf T, A Detlaf A. Dimensionless criteria as a method of quantitative characterization of animal development. In: Mathematical biology of development, 25-39(1982).

[15] V Dokuchaev V. The theory of nature zones. Moscow: Geografgiz, 63(1948).

[16] C Dymond C, S Beukema, R Nitschke C et al. Carbon sequestration in managed temperate coniferous forests under climate change. Biogeosciences, 13, 1933-1947(2016).

[17] R Emanuel W, H Shugart H, P Stevenson M. Climate change and the broad scale distribution of terrestrial ecosystem complexes. Climate Change, 7, 29-43(1985).

[18] Global forest resources assessment 2005—Progress towards sustainable forest management.. FAO Forestry Paper 147, Rome, Italy, 320(2006).

[19] R Fatemi F, D Yanai R, P Hamburg S et al. Allometric equations for young northern hardwoods: The importance of age-specific equations for estimating aboveground biomass. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 41, 881-891(2011).

[20] A Felton, U Nilsson, J Sonesson et al. Replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands: Ecosystem service implications of two production forest alternatives in Sweden. Ambio, 45, 124-139(2016).

[21] K Folland C, N Palmer T, E Parker D. Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. In: Houghton J T et al. (eds.). Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1032(2001).

[22] I Forrester D, H Tachauer I H, P Annighoefer et al. Generalized biomass and leaf area allometric equations for European tree species incorporating stand structure, tree age and climate. Forest Ecology and Management, 396, 160-175(2017).

[23] L Fu, W Sun, G Wang. A climate-sensitive aboveground biomass model for three larch species in northeastern and northern China. Trees, 31, 557-573(2017).

[24] N Gabeev V. Ecology and productivity of Scots pine forests.. Novosibirsk, Nauka:, 229(1990).

[25] A Genet, H Wernsdörfer, M Jonard et al. Ontogeny partly explains the apparent heterogeneity of published biomass equations for Fagus sylvatica in central Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 1188-1202(2011).

[26] J Givnish T. Adaptive significance of evergreen vs. deciduous leaves: Solving the triple paradox. Silva Fennica, 36, 703-743(2002).

[27] F Jordan C, G Farnworth E. Natural vs. plantation forests: A case study of land reclamation strategies for the humid tropics. Environmental Management, 6, 485-492(1982).

[28] D Khan, A Muneer M, U Nisa Z et al. Effect of climatic factors on stem biomass and carbon stock of Larix gmelinii and Betula platyphylla in Daxing’anling Mountain of Inner Mongolia, China. Advances in Meteorology, 2019, 1-10(2019).

[29] P Kirilenko A, A Sedjo R. Climate change impacts on forestry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 104, 19697-19702(2007).

[30] J Laing, J Binyamin. Climate change effect on winter temperature and precipitation of Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada from 1943 to 2011. American Journal of Climate Change, 2, 275-283(2013).

[31] von Liebig J. Organic chemistry in its application to agriculture and physiology(1840). http://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/liebig_agricultur_1840

[32] B Liu L, M Yang H, Y Xu et al. Forest biomass and net primary productivity in southwestern China: A Meta-analysis focusing on environmental driving factors. Forests, 7, 173(2016). http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/7/8/173

[33] A Luganskiy N, V Shipitsina O. Comparative productivity of artificial and natural forests. Forest Bulletin, 3, 50-53(2008).

[34] H Lyr, H Polster, J Fiedler H. Woody physiology. Jena,. VEB Gustav Fischer publishing house, 444(1967).

[35] B Mackey. Counting trees, carbon and climate change. Significance, 11, 19-23(2014).

[36] A Makarenko A, P Biryukova Z. Productivity and stability of artificial forest stands in Northern Kazakhstan. In: Productivity and stability of forest ecosystems. (Abstracts of papers for the international symposium, 16-18 August, , 44(1982).

[37] D Merzlenko M. Actual aspects of artificial reforestation. Lesnoy Zhurnal (Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions), 3, 22-30(2017).

[38] W Morley J, D Batt R, L Pinsky M. Marine assemblages respond rapidly to winter climate variability. Global Change Biology, 23, 2590-2601(2017).

[39] J Ni, S Zhang X, O Scurlock J M. Synthesis and analysis of biomass and net primary productivity in Chinese forests. Annals of Forest Science, 58, 351-384(2001).

[40] Е Nikitin K. Forest and mathematics. Forest Management, 5, 25-29(1965).

[41] A Niskanen. Forest plantations in the South: Environmental-economic evaluation. In: Palo M, Vanhanen H (eds). World forests from deforestation to transition? World forests, 2(2000).

[42] W Ochał, B Wertz, J Socha. Evaluation of aboveground biomass of black alder. In: Andrzej M. Jagodziński and Andrzej Węgiel (eds.). PoznańForest Biomass Conference 2013, 7-9 October 2013, Mierzęcin, Poland, 40(2013).

[43] P Odum E. Fundamentals of ecology. Moscow: “Mir” Publishing: 740. Translated from: Odum E P. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology (the third edition)(1975).

[44] M Pawson S, A Brin, G Brockerhoff E et al. Plantation forests, climate change and biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22, 1203-1227(2013).

[45] N Polyakov A, F Ipatov L, V Uspensky V. Productivity of forest plantations. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 240(1986).

[46] Q Qiu, Q Yun, S Zuo et al. Variations in the biomass of Eucalyptus plantations at a regional scale in Southern China. Journal of Forestry Research, 29, 1263-1276(2018).

[47] C Rodriguez-Vallejo, M Navarro-Cerrillo R. Contrasting response to drought and climate of planted and natural Pinus pinaster Aiton forests in Southern Spain. Forests, 10, 603(2019).

[48] M Romanov E, V Nureeva T, A Belousov A. The role of artificial stands of pine ( Pinus sylvestris L.) in improving the quality of the forest fund of the Kirov oblast. Forest Bulletin, 4, 29-37(2014).

[49] I Rubtsov V, I Novoseltseva A, K Popov V et al. Biological productivity of Scots pine in forest-steppe zone. Moscow: Nauka, 223(1976).

[50] I Rukhovich D, I Pankova E, V Kalinina N et al. Quantification of the parameters of zones and facies of chestnut soils in Russia on the basis of the climatic-soil-textural index. Eurasian Soil Science, 52, 271-282(2019).

[51] S Schaphoff, O Reyer C P, D Schepaschenko et al. Tamm review: Observed and projected climate change impacts on Russia’s forests and its carbon balance. Forest Ecology and Management, 361, 432-444(2016).

[52] E Shelford V. Animal communities in temperate America as illustrated in the Chicago region: A study in animal ecology, 362(1913).

[53] P Spathelf, J Stanturf, M Kleine et al. Adaptive measures: Integrating adaptive forest management and forest landscape restoration. Annals of Forest Science, 75, 55(2018).

[54] R Stage A, L Renner D, C Chapman R. Selected yield tables for plantations and natural stands in Inland Northwest Forests. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. Research Paper INT-, 394, 60(1988).

[55] C Stegen J, G Swenson N, J Enquist B et al. Variation in above-ground forest biomass across broad climatic gradients. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20, 744-754(2011).

[56] I Tolmachev A. Fundamentals of plant habitat theory: Introduction to plant community chorology, 100(1962).

[57] L Tsel’niker Y. Structure of spruce crown. Russian Journal of Forest Science, 4, 35-44(1994).

[58] A Usoltsev V. Birch and aspen crown biomass in forests of Northern Kazakhstan. Bulletin of Agricultural Science of Kazakhstan, 4, 77-80(1972).

[59] A Usoltsev V. Modeling of the structure and dynamics of forest stand biomass, 191(1985). http://elar.usfeu.ru/handle/123456789/3353.

[60] A Usoltsev V. Single-tree biomass of forest-forming species in Eurasia: Database, climatе-related geography, weight tables. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Forest Engineering University, 336(2016). http://elar.usfeu.ru/handle/123456789/5696

[61] A Usoltsev V, P Voronov M, V Azarenok M et al. Transcontinental additive allometric models and weight tables for estimating biomass of two-needled pine trees in natural forests and plantations. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals, 165, 56-64(2017).

[62] A Usoltsev V, W Zukow, A Osmirko A et al. Additive biomass models for Larix spp. single-trees sensitive to temperature and precipitation in Eurasia. Ecological Questions, 30, 57-67(2019).

[63] P Vanninen, H Ylitalo, R Sievänen et al. Effects of age and site quality on the distribution of biomass in Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L.). Trees, 10, 231-238(1996).

[64] F Vasseur, M Exposito-Alonso, J Ayala-Garay O et al. Adaptive diversification of growth allometry in the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 115, 3416-3421(2018).

[65] (2007). https://www.mapsofworld.com/referals/weather.

[66] G Yu, Y Liu, X Wang et al. Age-dependent tree-ring growth responses to climate in Qilian juniper ( Sabina przewalskii Kom.). Trees, 22, 197-204(2008).

[67] S Zeng W, Y Chen X, Y Pu et al. Comparison of different methods for estimating forest biomass and carbon storage based on National Forest Inventory data. Forest Research, 31, 66-71(2018).

[68] S Zeng W, R Duo H, D Lei X et al. Individual tree biomass equations and growth models sensitive to climate variables for Larix spp. in China. European Journal of Forest Research, 136, 233-249(2017).

[69] M Zolotukhin F. Comparative analysis of young Scots pine development of natural and artificial origin. Forest management, 2, 30-33(1966).

[70] B Zubairov, U Heußner K, H Schröder. Searching for the best correlation between climate and tree rings in the Trans-Ili Alatau, Kazakhstan. Dendrobiology, 79, 119-130(2018).