Are There Differences in the Response of Natural Stand and Plantation Biomass to Changes in Temperature and Precipitation? A Case for Two-needled Pines in Eurasia

Vladimir Andreevich USOLTSEV; Seyed Omid Reza SHOBAIRI; Ivan Stepanovich TSEPORDEY; Amirhossein AHRARI; Meng ZHANG; Ahmad Anees SHOAIB; Viktor Petrovich CHASOVSKIKH

doi:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.04.001

Journal of Resources and Ecology, Volume. 11, Issue 4, 331(2020)

Are There Differences in the Response of Natural Stand and Plantation Biomass to Changes in Temperature and Precipitation? A Case for Two-needled Pines in Eurasia

Vladimir Andreevich USOLTSEV, Seyed Omid Reza SHOBAIRI^*, Ivan Stepanovich TSEPORDEY, Amirhossein AHRARI, Meng ZHANG, Ahmad Anees SHOAIB, and Viktor Petrovich CHASOVSKIKH

Author Affiliations

show less

Figures & Tables(10)

Fig. 1. Fig. 1

Fig. 2. Fig. 2

Fig. 3. Fig. 3

Fig. 4. Fig. 4

Fig. 5. Fig. 5

Fig. 6. Fig. 6

Fig. 7. Fig. 7

Table 1.
Distribution of the 3847 sample trees by species, countries, regions, and mensuration indices

View table

View in Article

Table 1.
Distribution of the 3847 sample trees by species, countries, regions, and mensuration indices

Regions	Species of the subgenus Pinus L.	Ages(yr)	DBH (cm)	Heights (m)		Sample No.
Natural stand
West Europe	P. sylvestris L.	11-100	1.4-53.1	2.3-32.0			19
Scandinavia	P. sylvestris L.	9-212	1.9-42.0	3.3-32.4			117
The Ukraine and Byelorussia	P. sylvestris L.	24-186	1.5-54.6	1.6-36.6			205
European Russia	P. sylvestris L.	10-207	0.9-54.0	2.2-30.2			514
Turgay deflection	P. sylvestris L.	13-110	0.3-47.8	1.4-27.4			411
Central Siberia	P. sylvestris L.	4-430	0.5-65.6	1.6-28.8			587
China	P. sylvestris L.	100	18.0	19.0			1
	P.massoniana Lamb.	20	8.0-22.3	10.4-16.5			8
Japan	P. densiflora S. et Z.	49-120	9.2-60.9	14.1-35.7			11
	P. thunbergii Parl.	22-33	9.0-24.3	9.5-16.6			7
Sub-total							1880
Plantations
West and Central Europe	P. sylvestris L.	7-50	0.5-36.5		1.4-21.0	77
Scandinavia	P. sylvestris L.	5-143	1.2-37.1		2.1-25.6	196
The Ukraine and Byelorussia	P. sylvestris L.	8-90	2.1-42.9		2.2-34.7	1010
European Russia	P. sylvestris L.	6-78	1.5-30.1		1.8-32.6	160
Turgay deflection	P. sylvestris L.	9-50	0.4-21.7		1.4-16.2	215
Central Siberia	P. sylvestris L.	10-73	2.0-36.0		2.4-21.6	170
Iraq	P. halepensis Mill.	24	15.8		7.4	1
China	P. tabuliformis Carr.	17-25	4.0-12.0		3.3-10.8	8
Japan	P. densiflora S. et Z.	3-53	1.7-39.1		2.0-18.7	108
	P. thunbergii Parl.	5-34	4.6-11.4		4.7-7.6	12
Sub-total						1967

Table 2.
Characteristics of regression model (1) calculated

View table

View in Article

Table 2.
Characteristics of regression model (1) calculated

P_i	Regression model calculated	adjR²	SE
P_s	P_s = 2.014×10^‒3+A^0.1525+D^1.5284+H^0.4322+D^0.1398(ln^H⁾+e^-0.1448^B+(T+40)^0.0526^B+(T+40)^0.6901+PR^0.4292+(T+40)^-0.1046(ln^PR⁾	0.987	1.24
P_f	P_f = 7.842×10^‒5+A^-0.4624+D^2.4422+H^-1.2824+D^0.1571(ln^H⁾+e^1.3265^B+(T+40)^-0.3345^B+(T+40)^2.1870+PR^1.4287+(T+40)^-0.3918(ln^PR⁾	0.900	1.61
P_b	P_b = 6.524×10^‒6+A^-0.1796+D^2.8848+H^-1.6954+D^0.1995(ln^H⁾+e^0.1512^B+(T+40)^-0.0343^B+(T+40)^2.4966+PR^1.5638+(T+40)^-0.4007(ln^PR⁾	0.926	1.66
P_a	P_a = 2.218×10^‒4+A^0.0407+D^1.7700+H^-0.1235+D^0.1778(ln^H⁾+e^0.2536^B+(T+40)^-0.0629^B+(T+40)^1.6918+PR^1.0370+(T+40)^-0.2635(ln^PR⁾	0.986	1.24

Table 3.
Changes in the excess percentage (%) of different components biomass of plantation trees above natural ones due to changes in January temperature
View table
View in Article
Table 3.
Changes in the excess percentage (%) of different components biomass of plantation trees above natural ones due to changes in January temperature
Biomass component Mean temperature in January (℃)
-20 -16 -12 -8 -4 0 4
Stems 1.3 2.2 3.0 3.7 4.3 4.8 5.3
Foliage 27.7 23.1 19.1 15.4 12.0 8.8 5.9
Branches 4.8 4.2 3.6 3.2 2.8 2.5 2.1
Aboveground 6.3 5.2 4.3 3.5 2.8 2.1 1.5

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Vladimir Andreevich USOLTSEV, Seyed Omid Reza SHOBAIRI, Ivan Stepanovich TSEPORDEY, Amirhossein AHRARI, Meng ZHANG, Ahmad Anees SHOAIB, Viktor Petrovich CHASOVSKIKH. Are There Differences in the Response of Natural Stand and Plantation Biomass to Changes in Temperature and Precipitation? A Case for Two-needled Pines in Eurasia[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(4): 331

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Forest Ecosystem

Received: Feb. 18, 2020

Accepted: May. 15, 2020

Published Online: Oct. 17, 2020

The Author Email: SHOBAIRI Seyed Omid Reza (Omidshobeyri214@gmail.com)

DOI:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.04.001

Topics

Resource Economy

Research Articles

Table 1. Distribution of the 3847 sample trees by species, countries, regions, and mensuration indices

Table 1. Distribution of the 3847 sample trees by species, countries, regions, and mensuration indices

Table 2. Characteristics of regression model (1) calculated

Table 2. Characteristics of regression model (1) calculated

Table 3. Changes in the excess percentage (%) of different components biomass of plantation trees above natural ones due to changes in January temperature

Table 3. Changes in the excess percentage (%) of different components biomass of plantation trees above natural ones due to changes in January temperature

Table 1.
Distribution of the 3847 sample trees by species, countries, regions, and mensuration indices

Table 1.
Distribution of the 3847 sample trees by species, countries, regions, and mensuration indices

Table 2.
Characteristics of regression model (1) calculated

Table 2.
Characteristics of regression model (1) calculated

Table 3.
Changes in the excess percentage (%) of different components biomass of plantation trees above natural ones due to changes in January temperature

Table 3.
Changes in the excess percentage (%) of different components biomass of plantation trees above natural ones due to changes in January temperature