Forensic Sciences Research, Volume. 9, Issue 2, owae022(2024)

Modified differential lysis for sexual assault samples using a combined enzymatic and alkaline approach

Brittany C. Hudson1,2、* and Tracey Dawson Green1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Forensic Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
  • 2Integrative Life Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(5)
    Overview of the modified differential lysis technique using a combined enzymatic and alkaline approach. Cells are first eluted from a swab cutting (1). Enzymatic lysis of non-sperm cells is conducted using prepGEM™ () and heat () (2), then intact sperm cells are pelleted via centrifugation (3). The entire supernatant is removed as the non-sperm fraction (4), leaving behind the pellet as the sperm fraction (5). Both non-sperm and sperm fractions are then subjected to alkaline solution at 75°C to lyse all remaining cells (figure created in part using BioRender.com).
    Percentage of total DNA retained in sperm and non-sperm fractions after treatment of semen, vaginal, and mixture eluates with the prepGEM/alkaline assay (n = 10). This technique was able to retain 72.0% ± 18.3% and 29.5% ± 23.7% of total DNA in sperm fractions from semen samples and mixture samples, respectively.
    Percentage of total DNA retained in sperm fractions from single-source semen and vaginal eluates relative to the total DNA yield after treatment with the prepGEM/alkaline assay (n = 10). Linear trendlines indicated no correlation between cellular input (i.e., total DNA yield) and the percentage of DNA retained in sperm fractions for each sample type, signifying that prepGEM can lyse a wide range of cellular input.
    Representative blue channel STR electropherograms for mixtures processed using the prepGEM/alkaline differential lysis technique. Unseparated mixture controls exhibited a mean M:F ratio of 1:1.9 (A), while non-sperm fractions had a mean M:F ratio of 1:5.5 (B). Sperm enrichment was demonstrated in sperm fractions, with STR profiles experiencing a 7.97-fold M:F improvement over unseparated controls and a mean M:F of 1.7:1 (C). Asterisks denote unshared female alleles, while unshared male alleles are represented by ∇. Other colour channels demonstrated similar results.
    • Table 1. Male-to-female (M:F) DNA ratios after DNA quantification and short tandem repeat (STR) profiling for semen–vaginal mixture samples (n = 10) processed using the prepGEM™/alkaline assay either without (i.e., “unseparated”) or with fractional separation.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Male-to-female (M:F) DNA ratios after DNA quantification and short tandem repeat (STR) profiling for semen–vaginal mixture samples (n = 10) processed using the prepGEM™/alkaline assay either without (i.e., “unseparated”) or with fractional separation.

      SampleDNA quantificationSTR profile analysisM:F fold improvement (SF/unseparated)*
      UnseparatedSperm fraction (SF)UnseparatedSperm fraction (SF)
      Mixture 11:36.501:4.701:7.841:2.962.65
      Mixture 21:41.701:6.201:6.201:3.451.80
      Mixture 31:13.101:3.201:2.942.30:16.75
      Mixture 41:71.801:29.801:12.101:8.471.43
      Mixture 51:1.805.20:101.38:111.03:17.97
      Mixture 61:13.101:6.701:3.111:1.292.42
      Mixture 71:3.001:1.402.19:11.71:10.78
      Mixture 81:38.501:13.801:25.751:6.274.11
      Mixture 91:17.001:3.301:5.191:2.492.08
      Mixture 101:14.601:11.201:7.531:3.722.02
      Average1:8.021:1.381:2.011.74:13.20 ± 2.40
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Brittany C. Hudson, Tracey Dawson Green. Modified differential lysis for sexual assault samples using a combined enzymatic and alkaline approach[J]. Forensic Sciences Research, 2024, 9(2): owae022

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Articles

    Received: Oct. 14, 2023

    Accepted: Mar. 28, 2024

    Published Online: Sep. 22, 2025

    The Author Email: Brittany C. Hudson (hudsonbc@vcu.edu)

    DOI:10.1093/fsr/owae022

    Topics