Photonics Research, Volume. 11, Issue 11, 1802(2023)
Highly robust spatiotemporal wavefront prediction with a mixed graph neural network in adaptive optics
Fig. 1. Flowchart of spatiotemporal wavefront prediction. (a) Training dataset configuration. (b) Graph embedding from the covariance matrix of coefficients. (c) In the testing process, Zernike coefficients of previous 10 frames are inputs, and the predicted coefficients are obtained by the trained MGNN.
Fig. 2. Network architecture of the MGNN. (a) Overall framework. (b) Details of temporal feature catcher. (c) Details of spatial feature analyzer. (
Fig. 3. (a) Optical setup model of the AO system. TGP, turbulence generating pool; WFS, wavefront sensor; DM, deformable mirror. (b) Data flow of conventional AO (gray lines) and predictive AO (blue lines). (c) Simulated atmospheric turbulence measuring process.
Fig. 4. Comparison of one-frame prediction accuracy by three algorithms. (a), (b) Predicted Zernike coefficients and corresponding wavefronts of future third frame in test set 1 as two samples. MGNN, our proposed method; LSTM, one non-linear algorithm; LMMSE, one linear algorithm; AE, absolute error.
Fig. 5. Comparison of overall prediction performance in different test sets. (a1) Histograms and normal curves of RMS values in test set 1.
Fig. 6. Comparison of overall prediction performance using test sets with changing Fried parameters. Histograms and normal curves of RMS values are counted in test sets 3, 4, 1, 5, respectively. MGNN: blue; LSTM: red; LMMSE: orange; conventional AO: gray. Test sets 3, 4, and 5: Fried parameters change.
Fig. 7. Robustness to the experimental data. (a1) Histograms and normal curves of RMS values in test set 6. (a2) RMS curves of consecutive frames with or without prediction in (a1). MGNN: blue; LSTM: red; LMMSE: orange; conventional AO: gray. Black arrow: emphasis in comparison. (b) Predicted Zernike coefficients and corresponding wavefronts of future third frame in test set 6. AE, absolute error. (c1) RMS curves of consecutive frames with prediction by the MGNN and MGNN-E. MGNN-E (green): MGNN trained by the experimental data. (c2) Box plots of RMS in (c1).
Fig. 8. Closed-loop correction wavefront error in experiment. (a) Three stages of the AO system and their corresponding corrected wavefronts. (b) RMS curves of three stages in closed-loop correction. Without AO: black line; conventional AO: gray line; predictive AO with MGNN: blue line. (c) Focal spot and grid imaging of three stages.
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Ju Tang, Ji Wu, Jiawei Zhang, Mengmeng Zhang, Zhenbo Ren, Jianglei Di, Liusen Hu, Guodong Liu, Jianlin Zhao, "Highly robust spatiotemporal wavefront prediction with a mixed graph neural network in adaptive optics," Photonics Res. 11, 1802 (2023)
Category: Instrumentation and Measurements
Received: Jun. 13, 2023
Accepted: Aug. 19, 2023
Published Online: Oct. 7, 2023
The Author Email: Zhenbo Ren (zbren@nwpu.edu.cn), Jianglei Di (jiangleidi@gdut.edu.cn), Jianlin Zhao (jlzhao@nwpu.edu.cn)