Opto-Electronic Engineering, Volume. 52, Issue 2, 240269-1(2025)
An instrument detection method for complex retinal microsurgery
Fig. 1. Three main surgical instruments in RET1 dataset. (a) Vitrectomy cutter; (b) Internal limiting membrane peeling forceps; (c) Light pipe
Fig. 2. Overall network architecture of the proposed RM-YOLO model
Fig. 3. Cascading of three attention mechanisms in the detection head
Fig. 4. Integrated structure of the proposed dynamic head and decoupled head
Fig. 9. Results of the loss function experiments. (a) mAP at different values of α; (b) Bounding box regression loss corresponding to different IoUs; (c) mAP corresponding to different IoUs
Fig. 10. The results of three main types of surgical instruments in the experiment
Fig. 11. Detection results of different algorithms for a single surgical instrument in complex scenarios. (a) Severe instrument reflection; (b) Severe distortion in microscope imaging
Fig. 12. Detection results of different algorithms for multiple surgical instruments in complex scenarios. (a) High instrument similarity; (b) Microscope out of focus; (c) Occlusion between instruments
Fig. 13. Detection of surgical instruments during vitrectomy under different lighting conditions by the proposed algorithm
|
|
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Yuhao He, Yiwei Chen, Jinyu Fan, Yi He, Guohua Shi. An instrument detection method for complex retinal microsurgery[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2025, 52(2): 240269-1
Category: Article
Received: Nov. 20, 2024
Accepted: Jan. 15, 2025
Published Online: Apr. 27, 2025
The Author Email: