SSA-XGBoost model based high-precision density prediction method for well logging

Rui LI; Wensheng WU

doi:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2024.hjs.47.120502

NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, Volume. 47, Issue 12, 120502(2024)

SSA-XGBoost model based high-precision density prediction method for well logging

Rui LI and Wensheng WU^*

Author Affiliations

College of Geophysics, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

References(32)

[1] Tittman J, Wahl J S. The physical foundations of formation density logging (gamma-gamma)[J]. Geophysics, 30, 284-294(1965).

[2] Zhang Q, Wang Y. Formation density and photoelectric index calculation using an ultra-slim density tool[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 237, 212817(2024).

[3] ZHAO Taiping, LIU Tianding, WANG Xiuming. Effect of compensated density logging tool calibration on logging responses[J]. Well Logging Technology, 35, 576-580(2011).

[4] WU Wensheng, HUANG Longji. Monte Carlo simulation of three-detector density logging[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 47, 164-170(2004).

[5] YANG Ningning, ZHANG Yuxin, YU Huawei. Study on density logging method based on γ-ray broad beam attenuation model[J]. Nuclear Techniques, 43, 050502(2020).

[6] Zhao L M, Chen Z Y, Chen Y C. Application of multi-parameter lithologic seismic inversion to predict glutenite reservoirs in Santaizi subsag of Damintun sag[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 12, 53(2007).

[7] CHENG Xi, ZHOU Jun, FU Haicheng et al. Applicability and application of machine learning algorithm in logging interpretation[J]. Northwestern Geology, 56, 336-348(2023).

[8] Zhang Z, Zhang H, Li J et al. Permeability and porosity prediction using logging data in a heterogeneous dolomite reservoir: an integrated approach[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 86, 103743(2021).

[9] Yu Y, Si X S, Hu C H et al. A review of recurrent neural networks: LSTM cells and network architectures[J]. Neural Computation, 31, 1235-1270(2019).

[10] GUO Jianhong, ZHANG Zhansong, ZHANG Chaomo et al. The exploration of predicting CBM content by geophysical logging data: a case study based on slope correlation random forest method[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 45, 18-28(2021).

[11] Subasi A, El-Amin M F, Darwich T et al. Permeability prediction of petroleum reservoirs using stochastic gradient boosting regression[J]. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 13, 3555-3564(2022).

[12] Shwartz-Ziv R, Armon A. Tabular data: deep learning is not all you need[J]. Information Fusion, 81, 84-90(2022).

[13] Zhong R Z, Johnson R, Chen Z W. Generating pseudo density log from drilling and logging-while-drilling data using extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 220, 103416(2020).

[14] Pan S W, Zheng Z C, Guo Z et al. An optimized XGBoost method for predicting reservoir porosity using petrophysical logs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 208, 109520(2022).

[15] Liu W K, Zhao Y B, Yang M et al. XGBoost formation thickness identification based on logging data[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 918384(2022).

[16] Gao Z Z, Yin X C, Zhao F Z et al. A two-layer SSA-XGBoost-MLR continuous multi-day peak load forecasting method based on hybrid aggregated two-phase decomposition[J]. Energy Reports, 8, 12426-12441(2022).

[17] Xu B, Tan Y C, Sun W B et al. Study on the prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength of rock based on the SSA-XGBoost model[J]. Sustainability, 15, 5201(2023).

[18] Liu B, Rostamian A, Kheirollahi M et al. NMR log response prediction from conventional petrophysical logs with XGBoost-PSO framework[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 224, 211561(2023).

[19] PENG Ying, LI Kewen, ZHU Yingke et al. Identification method of sandstone and mudstone based on FL-XGBoost algorithm: a case study of Niuzhuang area in Shengli Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 30, 76-85(2023).

[20] ZHAO Xiaoyun. Study on artificial intelligence interpretation method of high water cut oil-water two-phase production profile logging[D](2023).

[21] Qiao L, Jia Z N, Cui Y et al. Shear sonic prediction based on DELM optimized by improved sparrow search algorithm[J]. Applied Sciences, 12, 8260(2022).

[22] TAN Lintao, LI Junliang, REN Bing et al. Health evaluation model of smart grid dispatch and control system based on RB-XGBoost algorithm[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 40, 189-195(2020).

[23] Xue J K, Shen B. A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: sparrow search algorithm[J]. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 8, 22-34(2020).

[24] Liu Y, Shi Y Q, Chen H et al. Chaos-assisted multi-population salp swarm algorithms: framework and case studies[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 168, 114369(2021).

[25] Niu P F, Niu S P, Liu N et al. The defect of the Grey Wolf optimization algorithm and its verification method[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 171, 37-43(2019).

[26] Marini F, Walczak B. Particle swarm optimization (PSO). A tutorial[J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 149, 153-165(2015).

[27] YU Huawei, ZHANG Qianwen, WANG Zhe et al. Standoff calculation and application of azimuthal density logging based on broad-beam γ-ray attenuation[J]. Nuclear Techniques, 46, 110503(2023).

[28] Solberg T D, DeMarco J J, Chetty I J et al. A review of radiation dosimetry applications using the MCNP Monte Carlo code[J]. Radiochimica Acta, 89, 337-355(2001).

[29] Gardner R P, Xu L B. Status of the Monte Carlo library least-squares (MCLLS) approach for non-linear radiation analyzer problems[J]. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 78, 843-851(2009).

[30] WANG Hu, LIU Rui, YUE Aizhong et al. Depth-of-investigation characteristics and influence of 350-kV high-voltage X-ray density logging[J]. Nuclear Techniques, 46, 100502(2023).

[31] SUN Peiwei, ZHANG Jianmin, YUE Aizhong et al. Monte-carlo numerical simulation of dual-detector density logging[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 41, 595-600(2007).

[32] HUANG Longji[M]. Radioactive logging principle(1985).

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Rui LI, Wensheng WU. SSA-XGBoost model based high-precision density prediction method for well logging[J]. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, 2024, 47(12): 120502

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: NUCLEAR PHYSICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Received: Apr. 25, 2024

Accepted: --

Published Online: Jan. 15, 2025

The Author Email: WU Wensheng (WUWensheng)

DOI:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2024.hjs.47.120502

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology