Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 44, Issue 18, 1801001(2024)
Comparative Study of Two Lidar-Based Water Cloud Retrieval Methods
Fig. 2. Flowchart of water cloud retrieval algorithm based on dual-field-of-view (dual-FOV) HSRL
Fig. 3. Variations of polarized ML signals and dual-FOV HSRL molecular signals versus the extinction coefficient and the effective radius of water clouds. (a) Parallel channel signals of polarized ML
Fig. 4. Polarized ML signals and dual-FOV HSRL molecular signals of four water cloud cases. (a) Parallel channel signals of polarized ML
Fig. 5. Lookup table results for polarized ML retrieval of four water cloud cases. (a) Case 1; (b) case 2; (c) case 3; (d) case 4
Fig. 6. Comparison of simulated and actual dual-FOV HSRL molecular signals at the end of retrieval for four water cloud cases. (a) Case 1; (b) case 2; (c) case 3; (d) case 4
Fig. 7. Comparison of retrieval results of four water cases based on polarized ML signals and dual-FOV HSRL molecular signals with the true values
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Kai Zhang, Dong Liu, Weize Li, Yao Sun, Xianzhe Hu, Shuaibo Wang, Xiaotao Li. Comparative Study of Two Lidar-Based Water Cloud Retrieval Methods[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(18): 1801001
Category: Atmospheric Optics and Oceanic Optics
Received: Feb. 5, 2024
Accepted: Mar. 12, 2024
Published Online: Sep. 11, 2024
The Author Email: Liu Dong (liudongopt@zju.edu.cn)
CSTR:32393.14.AOS240619