Advanced Imaging, Volume. 2, Issue 3, 031001(2025)

Edge accelerated reconstruction using sensitivity analysis for single-lens computational imaging Editors' Pick

Xuquan Wang1,2,3、†, Tianyang Feng1,2,3, Yujie Xing1,2,3, Ziyu Zhao1,2,3, Xiong Dun1,2,3、*, Zhanshan Wang1,2,3,4, and Xinbin Cheng1,2,3,4、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1MOE Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro-Structured Materials, Shanghai, China
  • 2Institute of Precision Optical Engineering, School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
  • 3Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Digital Optics, Shanghai, China
  • 4Shanghai Institute of Intelligent Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(14)
    The proposed edge acceleration framework for in situ reconstruction of computational imaging. Operator reconfiguration is first conducted for the selected AI chip. Then, the sensitivity of pruning and quantization is characterized for each layer or block. Next, sensitivity-aware pruning and quantization are sequentially performed following the guidance. Finally, the compressed model is deployed to the chip for acceleration.
    (a) The prototype of used single-lens infrared computational camera. (b) The architecture of the original network used in this work.
    Edge inference time of operators optimized by default.
    (a)–(f) Performance degradation caused by pruning at different stages. The black lines indicate the performance of the unpruned model without pruning, while the colored lines represent the performance after pruning the corresponding proportion of each block individually. For example, the red marker on the horizontal axis of D1 denotes the performance after pruning 25% of the D1 block, based on the original model.
    (a), (b) Performance degradation caused by quantization for different blocks. The black lines indicate the performance of the unpruned model with FP16 quantization, while the colored lines represent the performance of both the unpruned model and the uniformly 50%-pruned model under INT8 quantization, applied to each block individually. For example, the green marker on the horizontal axis of D1 denotes the performance after applying INT8 quantization to the D1 block based on the original model.
    (a) The edge pruning sensitivity results. (b) The edge quantization sensitivity results.
    Ablation experimental results on reconstruction focus on the details of clouds in local areas. Sensitivity-aware pruning restores finer texture details within clouds compared to uniform pruning, closely matching the performance of the unpruned network.
    Ablation experimental results on reconstruction focus on the details of vegetation in local areas. Sensitivity-aware pruning restores finer texture details of branches compared to uniform pruning, closely matching the performance of the unpruned network.
    Experimental results of MTF testing. The MTFs across various fields at the Nyquist frequency (42 lp/mm) all exceed 0.5, showing excellent high-frequency performance.
    Outdoor experimental assessment with real-time on-chip reconstruction.
    Experimental results of small infrared target tracking.
    • Table 1. Pruning Ratio Settings for Each Block in Different Methods.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Pruning Ratio Settings for Each Block in Different Methods.

      Pruning methodD1D2D3D4C1U4U3U2U1
      Unprune000000000
      Uniform-50%[61]0.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.5
      Uniform-60%0.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.6
      Sensitive-A0.1250.250.50.750.8750.750.50.250.125
      Sensitive-B0.50.50.50.750.750.750.50.50.5
      Sensitive-C0.50.50.50.750.8750.750.50.50.5
    • Table 2. Quantization Settings for Each Block in Different Methods.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Quantization Settings for Each Block in Different Methods.

      Quantization methodD1D2D3D4C1U4U3U2U1
      FP16 quantizationFP16FP16FP16FP16FP16FP16FP16FP16FP16
      INT8 quantizationINT8INT8INT8INT8INT8INT8INT8INT8INT8
      Mixed quantizationINT8INT8INT8INT8INT8INT8INT8INT8FP16
    • Table 3. Results of Model Compression Evaluation Experiments.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Results of Model Compression Evaluation Experiments.

      ModelParamsMACsFP16INT8Mixed
      PSNRSSIMFPSPSNRSSIMFPSPSNRSSIMFPS
      Unprune8.63M68.12G36.800.95288.0234.610.924517.0734.990.938712.28
      Uniform-50%[61]3.92M28.44G36.550.951818.3734.760.914829.7035.600.941423.68
      Uniform-60%3.06M21.33G36.430.95127.8034.140.888510.8535.450.93739.21
      Sensitive-A1.80M33.96G36.760.95286.1334.870.919010.7135.870.94446.72
      Sensitive-B2.15M23.67G36.670.952321.5234.780.915832.9735.920.943125.22
      Sensitive-C1.71M23.14G36.700.952221.6234.420.909433.1335.870.942926.03
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xuquan Wang, Tianyang Feng, Yujie Xing, Ziyu Zhao, Xiong Dun, Zhanshan Wang, Xinbin Cheng, "Edge accelerated reconstruction using sensitivity analysis for single-lens computational imaging," Adv. Imaging 2, 031001 (2025)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Article

    Received: Mar. 11, 2025

    Accepted: May. 9, 2025

    Published Online: Jun. 3, 2025

    The Author Email: Xiong Dun (dunx@tongji.edu.cn), Xinbin Cheng (chengxb@tongji.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AI.2025.10003

    Topics