Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 49, Issue 10, 1002504(2022)

Femtosecond Laser Direct Writing for Eternal Data Storage: Advances and Challenges

Lei Wang1, Xu Zhang1, Yi Wang2, Lin Wang1, Qing Wang1, Xue Zang1, Ruifan Li3, Yishi Xu1, Zhenze Li1, and Qidai Chen1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Electronic Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Integrated Optoelectronics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, Jilin, China
  • 2Department of Precision Instrument, State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 3College of Material Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, Jilin, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    State of big data storage and eternal time capsules fabricated by femtosecond laser direct writing. (a) Annual data increasing of the global datasphere[5]; (b) proportion of different methods for data storage[3]; (c) global data center compute instances[21]; (d) time capsules of eternal data storage fabricated by laser direct writing[36]
    Mechanism of femtosecond laser interaction with matter. (a) Process of multi-photonic ionization and avalanche ionization; (b) graph of pulse energy versus pulse duration defining three regimes of material modification using an NA=0.65 objective lens[52]
    Development of femtosecond laser-induced bulk damage for data storage. (a) Laser-induced refractive index changes[61]; (b) binary data stored in fused silica[66]; (c) plane of photonic lattice in Ge-doped silica[67]; (d) optical image of bits written inside fused silica[70]; (e) pattern of voids produced in sapphire[68]; (f) 100-point simultaneous multi-bit recording, reading, and signal enhancement[71]; (g) fused silica prints with images and information for the next 300 million years[72]
    Development of laser-induced nanogratings. (a) Four different polarization directions focused inside the sample[73]; (b) damage trajectories inside fused silica by unpolarized light transmission (left) and by orthogonal polarization light transmission (right), and arrows indicate the two thresholds for type Ⅰ and type Ⅱ damages[75]; (c) backscattering electron images[76]; (d) Auger spectra and corresponding line scanning results of oxygen and silicon on same silica glass[76]; (e) sideview of nanogratings induced inside fused silica[56]; (f) schematic of form birefringence introduced by the self-organized nanograting[77]
    Characteristics of nanogratings. (a)(d) Rewriting of nanograting voxels[80]; (e) 5D optical storage readout (left) and Arrhenius plot of the nanogratings decayrate (right)[19]; (f) a pseudo-color map of the world made with femtosecond laser-induced nanogratings[84]
    Mechanism of nanograting formation. (a)(d) Nanoplanes evolved by nanoplasmas[86]; (e) asymmetric enhancement effect of nanoplasmons[52]; (f) formation and relaxation process of STEs[82]
    High transmittance through Type X structure[99]. (a) Photo of quartz glass plate modified with Type Ⅱ (left) and Type X (right); (b) transmission spectra of birefringent structures of Type Ⅱ (red dashed line) and Type X (blue solid line); (c) retardance (blue) and transmission (red) images of birefringent structures written at different pulse densities; (d) retardance (blue) and transmission (red) images of birefringent structures written at different pulse durations
    High-speed writing of birefringent structure through pulse energy modulation[101]. (a) Slow axis azimuth images of the writing structure at different repetition rates (1 MHz, 5 MHz, and 10 MHz); (b) simulation of light intensity distribution around nanobodies with different diameters; (c) contrast of writing birefringent structure before and after modulating energy; (d) simulation of temperature evolution of focal center
    Readout schematic for permanent optical storage by femtosecond laser direct writing. (a) Diagram of the setup of a birefringent microscope[103]; (b) optical storage encoding method, data readout image,and decoding method[37]
    Diagram of O-FIB[108]. (a) Theoretical and experimental verification; (b) self-regulation of O-FIB; (c) curvature and separation control of O-FIB
    • Table 1. Comparison of different storage media

      View table

      Table 1. Comparison of different storage media

      MediaLifetime /aStorage capacityAdvantageDisadvantageRef.
      SSD2532 GB5 TBFast reading/writing, high compatibility, and shock-resistanceHigh costs, low capacity, and short lifecycle[14]
      HDD3564 GB20 TBFast reading/writing, high capacity, and high compatibilityHigh environmental standards and high power consumption[15-16]
      BD305025200 GBLow consumption, long-term storage, and portabilityCapacity <1 TB, scratched disk[1217]
      Tape2030300 GB330 TB(201 Gbit/in2)Low consumption, cost-effective, dependability, and simple replicationLimit scalability and potential media issues[1318]
      Glass>1000up to 360 TBPermanent storage, low power consumption, security, and high capacityLow writing speed[19-20]
    • Table 2. Relationship between dot spacing, layer spacing, and bit number per dot and capacity in a sample with diameter of 120 mm and thickness of 2 mm

      View table

      Table 2. Relationship between dot spacing, layer spacing, and bit number per dot and capacity in a sample with diameter of 120 mm and thickness of 2 mm

      Dot spacing /μmLayer spacing /μmNumber of layersBit number per dotCapacity /TB
      1.0209610.13
      0.52019110.53
      0.51019111.05
      0.51019122.11
      0.253818100
      0.1295181000
    • Table 3. Relationship among writing speed, pulse number per dot, bit number per dot, and channels when laser repetition rate is 10 MHz

      View table

      Table 3. Relationship among writing speed, pulse number per dot, bit number per dot, and channels when laser repetition rate is 10 MHz

      Pulse number per dotBit number per dotMax speed10 channels’ speed
      100112.5 kB/s125 kB/s
      504100 kB/s1 MB/s
      104500 kB/s5 MB/s
      285 MB/s50 MB/s
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Lei Wang, Xu Zhang, Yi Wang, Lin Wang, Qing Wang, Xue Zang, Ruifan Li, Yishi Xu, Zhenze Li, Qidai Chen. Femtosecond Laser Direct Writing for Eternal Data Storage: Advances and Challenges[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2022, 49(10): 1002504

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Received: Jan. 12, 2022

    Accepted: Mar. 1, 2022

    Published Online: May. 12, 2022

    The Author Email: Chen Qidai (chenqd@jlu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL202249.1002504

    Topics