Journal of Inorganic Materials, Volume. 40, Issue 6, 704(2025)

Effect of Ga3+ Doping on Crystal Structure Evolution and Microwave Dielectric Properties of SrAl2Si2O8 Ceramic

Changzhi YIN1,2, Mingfei CHENG1,2, Weicheng LEI1,2, Yiyang CAI1,2, Xiaoqiang SONG1,2, Ming FU1,2, Wenzhong LÜ1,2, and Wen LEI1,2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 11. Key Lab of Functional Materials for Electronic Information (B) of MOE, School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
  • 22. Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Microwave Communication Materials and Devices, Wenzhou Advanced Manufacturing Institute of HUST, Wenzhou 325000, China
  • show less

    The feldspar-based microwave dielectric ceramic with low relative permittivity (εr) and excellent mechanical properties has attracted much attention in the fifth-generation wireless communication technology. In this work, a series of microwave dielectric ceramic SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 (0.1≤x≤2.0) was synthesized using the traditional solid-state method. X-ray diffraction pattern indicates that Ga3+ can be dissolved into Al3+, forming a solid solution. Meanwhile, substitution of Ga3+ for Al3+ can promote the space group transition from I2/c (0.1≤x≤1.4) to P21/a (1.6≤x≤2.0) with coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) increasing from 2.9×10-6-1 to 5.2×10-6-1. During this substitution, the phase transition can significantly improve the structural symmetry to enhance the dielectric properties and mechanical properties. Rietveld refinement results indicate that Ga3+ averagely occupied four Al3+ compositions to form solid solution. All ceramics have a dense microstructure and high relative density above 95%. An ultralow εr of 5.8 was obtained at x=1.6 composition with high quality factor (Q×f) of 50700 GHz and negative temperature coefficients of resonant frequency (τf) of approximately -35×10-6-1. The densification temperature can be reduced to 940 ℃ by adding 4% (in mass) LiF, resulting in good chemical compatibility with Ag electrode. Meanwhile, negative τf can be tuned to near-zero (+3.7×10-6-1) by adding CaTiO3 ceramic.

    Keywords

    The frequency range of 8–12 GHz was determined as the X band in accordance with the IEEE 521-2002 criterion[1-3]. The primary advantage of the X band is its capability for ultralong transmission distance, which positions it as a key frequency range for applications in areas such as space exploration, satellite broadcast, wireless communication, and satellite communication. Among these applications, wireless communication has rapidly developed because of the increasing requirements of autonomous automobiles and artificial intelligence. The emergence of 5G technology, characterized by high data transfer speed and minimal signal latency, is a typical representative[4-6]. Considering that the signal delay is relevant to εr as ${{t}_{\mathrm{d}}}=\sqrt{{{\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{r}}}}{{l}_{\mathrm{ }\!\!\theta\!\!\text{ }}}/c$ where td, lθ, and c represent signal delay time, transmission distance, and velocity of light, the rapid development of wireless communication networks has provided a substantial drive for the exploration of low permittivity dielectric ceramics[7-10]. Given their importance, there is a strong demand for microwave dielectric ceramics with comprehensive dielectric properties.

    Among silicates, a novel microwave dielectric ceramic, namely SrGa2Si2O8 with low permittivity of 6.3, was reported in our previous work[10]. An intriguing observation is that SrAl2Si2O8 has a relatively high permittivity of 7.3 compared with SrGa2Si2O8, although the ion polarizability of Al3+ (0.79 Å3) is lower than that of Ga3+ (1.5 Å3)[11-15]. Based on previous works, SrAl2Si2O8 underwent a non- reversible phase transition from hexacelsian (hexagonal) to celsian (monoclinic) at 1200 ℃[16]. By contrast, the SrGa2Si2O8 ceramic has a low phase transition temperature around 900 ℃. To lower the transition temperature and densification temperature of SrAl2Si2O8 ceramic, Ga3+ was substituted for Al3+. The phase composition, structure evolution, microstructure, and microwave dielectric properties were investigated.

    1 Experimental

    The raw powders of SrCO3, Al2O3, Ga2O3, and SiO2 (99.99%, Aladdin Industrial Corporation) were weighed and subsequently ball-milled for 6 h. The slurries were dried at 80 ℃ for 8 h and then calcined at 1100 ℃ for 6 h. The calcined powders were re-milled, dried and then mixed with 5% (in mass) polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). The powders were pressed into a cylinder. The green specimens were firstly sintered at 550 ℃ for 2 h, followed by sintering at temperatures ranging from 1150 to 1450 ℃ for 6 h to achieve adequate densification.

    The phase composition was determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD) with CuKα radiation (χ’Pert PRO). The Rietveld refinement was employed using FullProf software. The thermal etching microstructure was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Quanta 200). The density was measured via Archimedes method. The relative permittivity and quality factor were measured using a network analyzer (Model N5230 A)[17]. τf were measured within the temperature range from room temperature T1 (25 ℃) to T2 (85 ℃) and calculated based on the following equation:

    ${{\tau }_{\mathrm{f}}}=\frac{{{f}_{2}}-{{f}_{1}}}{{{f}_{1}}({{T}_{2}}-{{T}_{1}})}$

    where f1 and f2 represent resonant frequency at 25 and 85 ℃, respectively. CTE was measured by NETZSCH DIL402C thermal expansion instrument.

    2 Results and discussion

    Fig. 1 shows the room temperature XRD patterns of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 (0.1≤x≤2.0) powders sintered at 1150 ℃ for 6 h. The diffraction peaks were well-indexed to the SrAl2Si2O8 phase, which indicates a monoclinic structure (space group of I2/c) for the composition range of x=0.1-1.4. Upon further doping with Ga3+, the space group transforms from I2/c to P21/a at x=1.6, which is attributed to SrGa2Si2O8 (PDF #76-0672). The enlarged patterns in the 2θ range from 26.6° to 28.0°, as shown in Fig. 1(b), feature a slight shift towards lower angles, which is ascribed to the larger ion radius of Ga3+ (R=0.47 Å, C.N.=4) compared to Al3+ (R=0.39 Å, C.N.=4). All results indicated that Ga3+ can be fully incorporated into Al3+ sites, forming a solid solution and triggering a phase transition.

    (a) XRD patterns of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 (0.1≤x≤2.0) ceramics sintered at 1150 ℃ for 6 h and (b) enlarged patterns in 2θ=26.5°-28.0°

    Figure 1.(a) XRD patterns of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 (0.1≤x≤2.0) ceramics sintered at 1150 ℃ for 6 h and (b) enlarged patterns in 2θ=26.5°-28.0°

    Fig. 2 shows the CTE for the compositions of x=1.0 and x=1.6 which represent the space groups of I2/c and P21/a, respectively. For x=1.0 composition, the CTE is measured at 2.9×10-6-1 within the temperature range of 100-315 ℃, increasing to around 7×10-6-1 at elevated temperatures. In contrast, x=1.6 composition exhibits a significantly higher CTE of 5.2×10-6-1 from 100 to 280 ℃, rising to around 11×10-6-1 at higher temperature. These results indicate that the P21/a structure has a large CTE compared to I2/c structure.

    CTE of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 ceramics with (a) x=1.0 and (b) x=1.6

    Figure 2.CTE of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 ceramics with (a) x=1.0 and (b) x=1.6

    To investigate the phase composition and structure of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 ceramic, Rietveld refinement was carried out on the XRD data using FullProf software. As reported in previous works, Al3+ in SrAl2Si2O8 has four different positions. Based on the crystallography, it is assumed that Ga3+ equally occupies these four positions. Fig. 3(a-d) show the representative refinement results of compositions x=0.1, 1.0, 1.6, and 1.9. The good agreement between measured and calculated data, accompanied by a low difference (yellow line), indicates the high reliability of the refinement results. The inset shows the enlarged pattern around 2θ=22°, where a splitting peak appears with Ga3+ doping and subsequently disappears at x=1.6 composition. This observation confirms our hypothesis that Ga3+ is distributed equally among the four Al3+ positions. Fig. 3(e) shows the variations of cell parameters, β, and cell volume as a function of x. In the range of 0.1≤x≤1.4, the cell parameters gradually increase with Ga3+ doping, leading to the increase of cell volume. The β angle also gradually increases from 115.358° (at x=0.1) to 115.375° (at x=1.4). A sharp change in parameters occurs at x=1.6 composition, which is attributed to the space group transition from I2/c to P21/a.

    (a-d) Rietveld refinement patterns of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 ceramics; (e) Variation trends of cell parameters, β, and cell volume as a function of x

    Figure 3.(a-d) Rietveld refinement patterns of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 ceramics; (e) Variation trends of cell parameters, β, and cell volume as a function of x

    Fig. 4 shows the polished and thermally etched surface morphologies of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 ceramics sintered at their optimum temperature. For x=0.1, the SrAl1.9Ga0.1Si2O8 ceramic presents a non-uniform grain distribution, characterized by small grains interspersed with large grains. All grains display a square morphology, tightly packed together. With Ga3+ doping increasing to x=1.6, the microstructure remarkably changes, and square grains are linked together to form a uniform and dense morphology, which indicates that a high concentration of Ga3+ can promote grain growth.

    SEM morphologies of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 ceramics after being polished and etched(a) x=0.1; (b) x=1.6; (c) x=1.8; (d) x=1.9

    Figure 4.SEM morphologies of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 ceramics after being polished and etched(a) x=0.1; (b) x=1.6; (c) x=1.8; (d) x=1.9

    Fig. 5 shows the density and microwave dielectric properties of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 ceramics as a function of x. As shown in Fig. 5(a), bulk density gradually increases from 2.74 g/cm3 (at x=0.1) to 3.60 g/cm3 (at x=2.0). Notably, the relative density of all ceramics exceeds 95%, which is an important factor influencing the physical and dielectric properties. Fig. 5(b) shows the variation of measured relative permittivity, which gradually decreases from 7.3 to 6.6 in the range of 0.1≤x≤1.4, followed by a sharp decline to 5.8 at x=1.6. Beyond this composition, the relative permittivity slightly increases to over 6.0. The ultralow relative permittivity at x=1.6 can be attributed to the space group transition, while the subsequent increase can be due to the higher polarizability of Ga3+ (α=1.5 Å3) compared with Al3+ (α=0.79 Å)[9,18 -19]. As reported by previous research, the theoretical relative permittivity can be estimated based on the Clausius-Mossotti equation[8-9,20]:

    ${{\varepsilon }_{\text{r}}}\text{=}(1+2b\alpha _{\mathrm{D}}^{\mathrm{T}}/{{V}_{\text{m}}})/(1-b\alpha _{\mathrm{D}}^{\mathrm{T}}/{{V}_{\text{m}}})$
    $\begin{align} & \alpha _{\text{D}}^{\text{T}}\text{=}\alpha (S{{\text{r}}^{2+}})+(2-x)\alpha (\text{A}{{\text{l}}^{3+}})+x\alpha (\text{G}{{\text{a}}^{3+}})+ \\ & \ \ \ \ \ \ 2\alpha (\text{S}{{\text{i}}^{4+}})\text{+}8\alpha ({{\text{O}}^{2-}}) \\ \end{align}$

    Densities and microwave dielectric properties of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 ceramics as a function of x(a) Density; (b) Permittivity; (c) Q×f and packing fraction; (d) τf

    Figure 5.Densities and microwave dielectric properties of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 ceramics as a function of x(a) Density; (b) Permittivity; (c) Q×f and packing fraction; (d) τf

    where Vm represents the cell volume, b=4π/3 while $\alpha _{\text{D}}^{\text{T}}$ is the total polarizability which can be obtained from equation (3). As shown in Fig. 5(b), the theoretical values demonstrate an increasing trend with Ga3+ doping. However, the theoretical values are slightly lower than the measured ones, which exhibit a decreasing trend. According to Shannon et al., the large difference can be attributed to the “Rattling” or “Compressed” cations in the lattice. The decreasing trend of measured permittivity is due to the low polarizability of Al3+ (α=0.79 Å3) compared with Ga3+ (α=1.5 Å3). The influence of porosity on relative permittivity can be estimated using Bosman Having’s method[21-24]:

    ${{\varepsilon }_{\text{corr}}}\text{=}{{\varepsilon }_{\text{r}}}(1+1.5P)$

    where P represents the fractional porosity. The corrected relative permittivity, as shown in Fig. 5(b), is slightly higher than the measured values, suggesting that relative density plays a crucial role in determining relative permittivity.

    Fig. 5(c) exhibits the variation of Q×f as a function of x. With Ga3+ doping, the Q×f value initially increases gradually and then exhibits a sharp increase from 37500 GHz (at x=1.4) to 96600 GHz (at x=2.0). The Q×f value is determined by both extrinsic factors, such as density, porosity, grain size, and second phase, and intrinsic factors, including lattice vibration and packing fraction (P.F.)[25-27]. Based on the XRD and SEM results, the influence of the second phase and density can be ruled out. To estimate the effect of intrinsic factors, the P.F. can be employed, which is defined as the summation of the volume of packed ions over the volume of a primitive unit cell. Higher P.F. results in reduced interspace for lattice vibration, thus reducing the dielectric loss and increasing the quality factor. As shown in Fig. 5(c), all compositions have high P.F., exceeding 55%, despite a slightly decreased trend, indicating other factors are also determining the quality factor. Notably, the P.F. also sharply increases at x=1.6, with a Q×f value of 50700 GHz.

    τf is approximately −35×10-6-1, which shows limited dependence on the sintering temperature and composition (Fig. 5(d)). The substantial absolute value |τf| immensely constrains the application of microwave dielectric ceramics. Two strategies have been constantly exploited to tune τf. Firstly, a composite ceramic with inverse τf is formed. Notably, TiO2 (τf~460×10-6-1) and CaTiO3 (CTO, τf~800×10-6-1) are commonly used[28-29]. Secondly, a solid solution is formed by ionic substitution to alter the crystal structure by modifying the bond valence and polyhedron distortion. Although the substitution of Ga3+ for Al3+ has caused transition of space group, the negative τf cannot be tuned.

    In this study, the CTO ceramic was selected as the compensator to buffer the negative τf of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8. The x=1.6 composition was selected as a representation. Fig. 6(a) exhibits the XRD patterns of the composite ceramic with 15% (in mass) CTO sintered at 1280 ℃ for 6 h. Only the peaks of SrGa2Si2O8 and CTO are present, indicating their coexistence without any additional phase peaks. Table 1 shows the microwave dielectric properties of the composite ceramics sintered at their optimum temperature. The increase of relative permittivity and decrease of quality factor can be attributed to the microwave dielectric properties of CTO (εr=~162, Q×f=~8700 GHz, τf=~+800×10-6-1). Notably, a near-zero τf of +3.7×10-6-1 is achieved at y=0.15.

    (a) XRD patterns of 0.85SrAl0.4Ga1.6Si2O8+0.15CaTiO3 ceramic sintered at 1280 ℃; (b) SrAl0.4Ga1.6Si2O8+4% (in mass) LiF cofired with 20% (in mass) Ag at 940 ℃

    Figure 6.(a) XRD patterns of 0.85SrAl0.4Ga1.6Si2O8+0.15CaTiO3 ceramic sintered at 1280 ℃; (b) SrAl0.4Ga1.6Si2O8+4% (in mass) LiF cofired with 20% (in mass) Ag at 940 ℃

    • Table 1.

      Microwave dielectric properties of (1-y)SrAl0.4Ga1.6Si2O8 + yCaTiO3 ceramics sintered at their optimum temperature

      Table 1.

      Microwave dielectric properties of (1-y)SrAl0.4Ga1.6Si2O8 + yCaTiO3 ceramics sintered at their optimum temperature

      yεrQ×f/GHz τf/(×10-6, ℃-1)
      0.036.150300-31.6
      0.066.349800-24.4
      0.096.549400-12.8
      0.126.748900-5.7
      0.157.048400+3.7

    The low-temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) technology has become the standard for passive integration and miniaturization because of its high-frequency characteristics, thermal stability, multi-function, high assembly density, etc. The LTCC technology primarily requires low densification temperature, which must be lower than the melting points of commonly used electrodes, such as Ag (~960 ℃) and Cu (~1060 ℃)[30-31]. In this work, LiF as the sintering aid was added to reduce the densification temperature of the SrAl0.4Ga1.6Si2O8 ceramic. Fig. 6(b) shows the XRD pattern of the SrAl0.4Ga1.6Si2O8 ceramic sintered at 940 ℃ with 4% (in mass) LiF. Only the peaks belonging to SrGa2Si2O8 (PDF #76-0672) and Ag (PDF #01-1164) can be detected, which indicates the absence of any chemical reaction between them. All results suggest that SrAl0.4Ga1.6Si2O8 microwave dielectric ceramics with a low relative permittivity and high quality factor possess a large application potential in the LTCC technology.

    3 Conclusions

    In this work, a series of microwave dielectric ceramics of SrAl2-xGaxSi2O8 were fabricated using conventional solid-state method. Based on the XRD patterns and Rietveld refinement results, the Ga3+ is averagely entered into four Al3+ positions to form solid solution in a wide range (0.1≤x<1.6). Meanwhile, the space group has transformed from I2/c to P21/a at x=1.6, coinciding with an increase in the CTE from 2.9×10-6 to 5.2×10-6-1. The microwave dielectric properties are significantly influenced by the lattice structure, resulting in a gradual decrease in relative permittivity to a minimum value of 5.8 at x=1.6, despite the greater polarizability of Ga3+ (α=1.5 Å3) compared to Al3+ (α=0.79 Å3). The quality factor reaches a maximum value of 96600 GHz at x=2.0. The negative τf can be tuned to +3.7×10-6-1 by adding 15% CaTiO3 ceramic. The densification temperature also can be reduced to 940 ℃ by adding 4% LiF as the sintering aid, which exhibits good chemical compatibility with Ag electrode. All results indicate that the SrAl0.4Ga1.6Si2O8 has a large application potential in LTCC technology.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors are grateful to the Analytical and Testing Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, for SEM analyses.

    [1] SEBASTIAN M T, UBIC R, JANTUNEN H. Low-loss dielectric ceramic materials and their properties[J]. International Materials Reviews, 60, 392(2015).

    [2] LI Q Q, TAN J, WU Z C et al. Hierarchical magnetic-dielectric synergistic Co/CoO/RGO microspheres with excellent microwave absorption performance covering the whole X band[J]. Carbon, 201:, 150(2023).

    [3] TIAN H R, ZHANG X H, ZHANG Z D et al. Low-permittivity LiLn(PO3)4 (Ln = La, Sm, Eu) dielectric ceramics for microwave/ millimeter-wave communication[J]. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 13, 602(2024).

    [4] ZHOU D, PANG L X, WANG D W et al. High permittivity and low loss microwave dielectrics suitable for 5G resonators and low temperature co-fired ceramic architecture[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 5, 10094(2017).

    [6] LOU W C, MAO M M, SONG K X et al. Low permittivity cordierite- based microwave dielectric ceramics for 5G/6G telecommunications[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 42, 2820(2022).

    [7] ULLAH A, LIU H X, HAO H et al. Influence of TiO2 additive on sintering temperature and microwave dielectric properties of Mg0.90Ni0.1SiO3 ceramics[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 37, 3045(2017).

    [8] SHANNON R D, ROSSMAN G R. Dielectric constants of silicate garnets and the oxide additivity rule[J]. American Mineralogist, 77, 94(1992).

    [9] SHANNON R D. Dielectric polarizabilities of ions in oxides and fluorides[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 73, 348(1993).

    [10] YIN C Z, DU K, ZOU Z Y et al. Design and fabrication of a C-band patch antenna using novel low permittivity SrGa2Si2O8 microwave dielectric ceramic[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 43, 6091(2023).

    [11] TIAN H R, ZHENG J J, LIU L T et al. Structure characteristics and microwave dielectric properties of Pr2(Zr1-xTix)3(MoO4)9 solid solution ceramic with a stable temperature coefficient[J]. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 116, 121(2022).

    [12] YIN C Z, DU K, SONG X Q et al. A novel low permittivity microwave dielectric ceramic Sr2Ga2SiO7 for application in patch antenna[J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 106, 4284(2023).

    [13] DOSLER U, KRZMANCM M, JANCAR B et al. A high-Q microwave dielectric material based on Mg3B2O6[J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 93, 3788(2010).

    [14] ZHOU D, PANG L X, WANG D W. High quality factor, ultralow sintering temperature Li6B4O9 microwave dielectric ceramics with ultralow density for antenna substrates[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry Engineering, 6, 11138(2018).

    [15] LIU B, HU C C, HUANG Y H et al. Crystal structure, infrared reflectivity spectra and microwave dielectric properties of CaAl2O4 ceramics with low permittivity[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 791:, 1033(2019).

    [16] BANSAL N P, DRUMMOND C H. Kinetics of hexacelsian-to- celsian phase transformation in SrAl2Si2O8[J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 76, 1321(1993).

    [17] HAKK B W, COLEMAN P D. A dielectric resonator method of measuring inductive capacities in the millimeter range[J]. IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 8, 402(1960).

    [18] LI C C, XIANG H C, XU M Y et al. Li2AGeO4 (A = Zn, Mg): two novel low-permittivity microwave dielectric ceramics with olivine structure[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 38, 1524(2018).

    [19] XING Z, YIN C Z, YU Z Z et al. Synthesis of LiBGeO4 using compositional design and its dielectric behaviors at RF and microwave frequencies[J]. Ceramics International, 46, 22460(2020).

    [20] BAO J, ZHANG Y P, KIMURA H et al. Crystal structure, chemical bond characteristics, infrared reflection spectrum, and microwave dielectric properties of Nd2(Zr1-xTix)3(MoO4)9 ceramics[J]. Journal of the Advanced Ceramics, 12, 82(2023).

    [21] YOON S H, KIM D, CHO S et al. Investigation of the relations between structure and microwave dielectric properties of divalent metal tungstate compounds[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 26, 2051(2006).

    [22] SONG X Q, DU K, LI J et al. Crystal structures and microwave dielectric properties of novel low-permittivity Ba1-xSrxZnSi3O8 ceramics[J]. Materials Research Bulletin, 112:, 178(2019).

    [23] SONG X Q, DU K, ZHANG X Z et al. Crystal structure, phase composition and microwave dielectric properties of Ca3MSi2O9ceramics[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 750:, 996(2018).

    [24] XIONG S Y, MO C, ZHU X W et al. Low-temperature sintering of LiBxAl1-xSi2O6 microwave dielectric ceramics with ultra-low permittivity[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 40, 536(2025).

    [25] KIM E S, CHUNB S, FREER R et al. Effects of packing fraction and bond valence on microwave dielectric properties of A2+B6+O4 (A2+: Ca, Pb, Ba; B6+: Mo, W) ceramics[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 30, 1731(2010).

    [26] KIM E S, KIM S H. Effects of structural characteristics on microwave dielectric properties of (1-x)CaWO4-xLaNbO4 ceramics[J]. Journal of Electroceramics, 17:, 471(2006).

    [27] LI C C, YIN C Z, KHALIQ J et al. Ultralow-temperature synthesis and densification of Ag2CaV4O12 with improved microwave dielectric performances[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry Engineering, 9:, 14461(2021).

    [28] WANG X Y, LIU T, CAO Z K et al. Lattice vibrational characteristics and structure-property relationships of Ca(Mg1/2W1/2)O3 microwave dielectric ceramics with different sintering temperatures[J]. Ceramics International, 48, 1415(2022).

    [29] GUO J, ZHOU D, WANG H et al. Microwave dielectric properties of (1-x)ZnMoO4-xTiO2 composite ceramics[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 509:, 5863(2011).

    [30] AN Z F, LV J Q, WANG X Y et al. Effects of LiF additive on crystal structures, lattice vibrational characteristics and dielectric properties of CaWO4 microwave dielectric ceramics for LTCC applications[J]. Ceramics International, 48, 29929(2022).

    [31] YIN C Z, ZOU Z Y, CHENG M F et al. Microwave dielectric properties of CaB2O4-CaSiO3 system for LTCC applications[J]. Crystals, 13, 790(2023).

    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Changzhi YIN, Mingfei CHENG, Weicheng LEI, Yiyang CAI, Xiaoqiang SONG, Ming FU, Wenzhong LÜ, Wen LEI. Effect of Ga3+ Doping on Crystal Structure Evolution and Microwave Dielectric Properties of SrAl2Si2O8 Ceramic [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2025, 40(6): 704

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Dec. 31, 2024

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Sep. 2, 2025

    The Author Email: Wen LEI (wenlei@mail.hust.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.15541/jim20240549

    Topics