Target Tracking Algorithm with Rotation Characteristics

Fig. 4. Success rate and precision after adding some challenge factors. (a) Success rate of scale change; (b) precision of scale change; (c) success rate of occlusion; (d) precision of occlusion

Download full size

Fig. 5. Success rate and precision on OTB-2013. (a) Precision; (b) success rate

Download full size

Fig. 6. Comparison of tracking results of two algorithms. (a) Video sequence of V03_2; (b) video sequence of V18_2

Download full size

Fig. 7. Comparison of tracking results of different algorithms. (a) David2; (b) Vase

Download full size

Table 1. Success rate
View table
Table 1. Success rate
Success rate Rotation Scale change All
Ours 0.9619 0.8701 0.6561
KCF 0.0037 0 0.0006
DSST 0.0431 0.9377 0.3579
BACF 0.0399 0.7724 0.2711
ECO-HC 0.0567 0.9921 0.4154
STAPLE 0.0053 0.1276 0.0087
STRCF 0.0648 0.8965 0.3893

Table 2. Precision
View table
Table 2. Precision
Precision Rotation Scale change All
Ours 0.8527 0.5192 0.5930
KCF 0.0596 0.1277 0.1461
DSST 0.0737 0.5899 0.3608
BACF 0.0681 0.5319 0.3646
ECO-HC 0.0748 0.5803 0.4303
STAPLE 0.0424 0.3517 0.2065
STRCF 0.0772 0.5721 0.4240

Table 3. Precision, success rate, and running speed of algorithm on OTB-2013

View table

Table 3. Precision, success rate, and running speed of algorithm on OTB-2013

Algorithm	Ours	KCF	FDSST	BACF	ECO-HC	STAPLE	STRCF
Precision	0.8370	0.7400	0.8040	0.8490	0.8510	0.7820	0.8890
Success rate	0.7880	0.6230	0.7470	0.8220	0.8030	0.7380	0.8450
Running speed /(frame·s^-1)	10.3	386.4	78.9	24.6	33.7	80.6	22.6