Progress in Geography, Volume. 39, Issue 7, 1073(2020)

Spatio-temporal change of population distribution and its influencing factors in a poor mountainous county: A case study of Song County, Henan Province

Qing LUO1,2, Bingbing WANG1, Xinsheng FAN1,2, and Xiaojiian LI1,2,3、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Collaborative Innovation Center of Urban-Rural Coordinated Development / School of Resources and Environment, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450046, China
  • 2Academician Laboratory for Urban and Rural Spatial Data Mining, Zhengzhou 450046, China
  • 3Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(9)
    研究区位置和范围Fig.1
    1996—2016年嵩县人口密度的空间分布Fig.2
    1996—2016年嵩县地区人口密度年均变化率Fig.3
    1996—2016年嵩县地区人口增长类型Fig.4
    1996—2016年嵩县人口密度影响因素回归系数分布Fig.5
    • Table 1.

      村域指标的选择和描述

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1.

      村域指标的选择和描述

      变量类型编号指标名称指标含义
      被解释变量Y人口密度村域常住人口除以村域土地面积
      解释变量
      自然条件X1地形起伏度用村域海拔高差之比与村域非平地比例和海拔高差之乘积来衡量,表征地表切割深度和海拔高度变化,反映村域人居环境适宜性
      X2平均坡度村域地表坡度均值,表征地形特征及相关农业生产条件
      X3村庄耕地面积村域耕地面积的总量,表征村庄自然资源的丰裕程度
      公共服务X4小学可达性村委会到最近小学的栅格成本时间,表征村域对基本公共服务的可获得性
      X5中学可达性村委会到最近中学的栅格成本时间,表征村域对基本公共服务的可获得性
      地理区位X6乡镇可达性村委会到最近乡镇政府所在地的栅格成本时间,表征对非农就业机会和市场机会的获得程度
      X7县城可达性村委会到最近县政府所在地的栅格成本时间,表征对非农就业机会和市场机会的获得程度
    • Table 2.

      嵩县人口分布影响因素OLS模型回归结果

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2.

      嵩县人口分布影响因素OLS模型回归结果

      年份变量非标准化系数标准化系数tSigVIF
      1996X1-5.599-0.314-7.452<0.001***1.589
      X30.0420.0811.9410.1211.155
      X50.0200.1733.108<0.001***2.771
      X7-0.010-0.727-12.202<0.001***3.186
      常数项6.86977.044
      AIC602.710
      R20.651
      2006X1-5.009-0.273-6.766<0.001***1.617
      X30.0140.0232.850<0.001***1.206
      X50.0280.5137.175<0.001***1.191
      X7-0.018-1.064-13.970<0.001***1.350
      常数项6.99774.806
      AIC588.586
      R20.686
      2016X1-7.345-0.382-8.217<0.001***1.601
      X30.0350.0551.334<0.001***1.263
      X50.0070.0561.117<0.001***1.882
      X7-0.016-0.530-10.176<0.001***2.006
      常数项7.04063.034
      AIC711.912
      R20.577
    • Table 3.

      GWR模型参数估计及检验结果

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3.

      GWR模型参数估计及检验结果

      模型参数1996年2006年2016年
      Bandwidth13268.16213803.51110753.464
      AICc496.966510.637586.815
      R20.7940.7930.781
      调整后的R20.7630.7660.738
    • Table 4.

      GWR模型回归系数描述性统计结果

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4.

      GWR模型回归系数描述性统计结果

      年份自变量最小值上分位中分位下分位最大值平均值正值比/%负值比/%
      1996X1-11.481-7.158-6.456-4.3260.343-5.7132.2097.80
      X3-0.049-0.031-0.0100.0580.3640.03045.6054.40
      X5-0.022-0.0010.0070.0110.0440.00773.9026.10
      X7-0.011-0.009-0.007-0.0060-0.0070100
      2006X1-12.281-8.287-7.020-3.7980.181-6.0770100
      X3-0.073-0.0060.0400.1160.2860.06271.3828.62
      X5-0.0160.0050.0150.0220.0310.01383.0216.98
      X7-0.020-0.016-0.012-0.0080.003-0.0123.1496.86
      2016X1-16.766-10.671-9.077-4.3321.853-7.7612.5297.48
      X3-0.072-0.0280.0120.1250.3280.05256.2943.71
      X5-0.064-0.020-0.0050.0060.027-0.00839.9460.06
      X7-0.018-0.013-0.010-0.0070.005-0.0098.8191.19
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Qing LUO, Bingbing WANG, Xinsheng FAN, Xiaojiian LI. Spatio-temporal change of population distribution and its influencing factors in a poor mountainous county: A case study of Song County, Henan Province[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(7): 1073

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: May. 30, 2019

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Jan. 28, 2021

    The Author Email: LI Xiaojiian (xjli@henu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.07.001

    Topics