Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 42, Issue 24, 2411002(2022)

Development of Imaging System of Array Compton Camera for Nuclear Decommissioning Scenarios

Xin Liu1,2, Peng Feng1、*, Zhiyang Yao3, Song Zhang1,2, Yikun Qian1,2, Yixin Liu2, Jian Wu2, Yonggang Yuan2, Jinhui Qu2, and Yanjun Bai1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Opto-Electronic Technology & Systems, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044, China
  • 2Institute of Nuclear Physics and Chemistry, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, Sichuan , China
  • 3Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(17)
    Compton imaging principle. (a) Typical structure of Compton camera; (b) Compton imaging principle diagram (grid in figure is imaging plane, A and B are interaction positions in scattering layer and absorption layer, respectively, θ is Compton scattering angle, and O is one point on reconstructed cone surface)
    Schematic diagram of Compton camera system
    Pictures of GAGG(Ce) crystal, Si-PM, and detector. (a) Before packaging of GAGG(Ce) crystal; (b) after packaging of GAGG(Ce) crystal; (c) Si-PM; (d) three views after detector is packaged
    Row/column readout circuit[18]
    Compton camera experimental platform
    Flowchart of SOE reconstruction algorithm
    2D scattering dot plot of detector (bright spots in figure correspond to detector pixels)
    Energy response of scattering layer and fitting curve of all-energy peak-to-energy [energy marked in Figs. 8(a)-(e) is energy corresponding to peak position of all-energy peak of interest). (a) 241Am energy spectrum; (b) 133Ba energy spectrum; (c) 152Eu energy spectrum; (d) 22Na energy spectrum; (e) 137Cs energy spectrum; (f) full energy peak position-energy fitting curve
    137Cs energy spectrum of single pixel
    Reconstruction result and angular resolution. (a) Imaging result; (b) relative strength change of reconstructed section in Fig. 10(a) (dashed frame corresponds to 0.8I, and I is peak intensity)
    Simulation scenario experimental configuration and experimental result. (a) Experimental scenario setting; (b) simulation scene experimental result
    • Table 1. Characteristics of GAGG(Ce) and commonly used inorganic scintillators in γ-ray imaging[9]

      View table

      Table 1. Characteristics of GAGG(Ce) and commonly used inorganic scintillators in γ-ray imaging[9]

      MaterialDensity /(g·cm-3Light yield /(photon·MeV-1Decay time /nsDeliquescence
      LaBr3(Ce)5.086300016Yes
      NaI(Tl)3.6741000230Yes
      CsI(Tl)4.5166000900Slightly
      LYSO7.13200041No
      BGO7.19000300No
      GAGG(Ce)6.6356000

      92(86%),

      174(14%)

      No
    • Table 2. Parameters of ON Semiconductor MicroFC-60035

      View table

      Table 2. Parameters of ON Semiconductor MicroFC-60035

      ParameterValue
      Package size /mm6.0
      Gain3×106
      Wavelength response /nm300-950
      Rise time /ns

      10(fast),

      40(standard)

      Temperature coefficient /(m·°C-121.5
    • Table 3. Detector configuration parameters of Compton camera with double-layer detector structure

      View table

      Table 3. Detector configuration parameters of Compton camera with double-layer detector structure

      DetectorParameterSetting
      Scattering detectorScintillator pixel size /(mm×mm×mm)2.2×2.2×5
      Number of scintillator arrays23×23
      Si-PM array area /(mm×mm)57.4×57.4
      Number of Si-PM arrays8×8
      Absorption detectorScintillator pixel size /(mm×mm×mm)2.2×2.2×10
      Number of scintillator arrays23×23
      Si-PM array area /(mm×mm)57.4×57.4
      Number of Si-PM arrays8×8
    • Table 4. Comparison of reconstruction time and imaging angular resolution of different reconstruction algorithms[19]

      View table

      Table 4. Comparison of reconstruction time and imaging angular resolution of different reconstruction algorithms[19]

      AlgorithmReconstruction time /sImaging angular resolution /(°)
      PSF-MLEM36.410.2
      Ordered OE-RR11.410.5
      SOE4.810.3
    • Table 5. Radioactive source information

      View table

      Table 5. Radioactive source information

      Radioactive sourceRadioactivity /BqInterested energy of gamma /keV
      241Am500059.54
      133Ba300081,303,356
      152Eu3000122,314
      22Na1500511
      137Cs2000,1.11×107662
    • Table 6. Performance comparison between our imaging system and existing Compton imaging systems

      View table

      Table 6. Performance comparison between our imaging system and existing Compton imaging systems

      ProductImaging timeAngular resolutionField of view
      H10071 min20°
      Compton camera proposed by Zhang96 min
      Our imaging system20 sπ
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xin Liu, Peng Feng, Zhiyang Yao, Song Zhang, Yikun Qian, Yixin Liu, Jian Wu, Yonggang Yuan, Jinhui Qu, Yanjun Bai. Development of Imaging System of Array Compton Camera for Nuclear Decommissioning Scenarios[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(24): 2411002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Imaging Systems

    Received: Sep. 5, 2022

    Accepted: Oct. 27, 2022

    Published Online: Dec. 14, 2022

    The Author Email: Peng Feng (coe-fp@cqu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS202242.2411002

    Topics