Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 61, Issue 18, 1837001(2024)

Detail-Preserving Multi-Exposure Image Fusion Based on Adaptive Weight

Ruihong Wen1,2,3, Chunyu Liu1,3、*, Shuai Liu1,3, Meili Zhou1,3, and Yuxin Zhang1,3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, Jilin, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Space-based Dynamic & Rapid Optical Imaging Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Changchun 130033, Jilin, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(12)
    Relationship between image information entropy and exposure time in low dynamic range scene
    Comparison before and after guided filtering
    The process of proposed method
    Laplace pyramid reconstruction
    Partial fusion results of proposed algorithm
    Fusion results of source image sequence Cave by different algorithms. (a) Multi-exposure image sequence Cave; (b) algorithm 1; (c) algorithm 2; (d) algorithm 3; (e) algorithm 4; (f) algorithm 5; (g) algorithm 6; (h) algorithm 7; (i) proposed algorithm
    Fusion results of source image sequence Lamp by different algorithms. (a) Multi-exposure image sequence Lamp(b) algorithm 1; (c) algorithm 2;(d) algorithm 3; (e) algorithm 4; (f) algorithm 5; (g) algorithm 6; (h) algorithm 7; (i) proposed algorithm
    Fusion results of source image sequence Mountain Garden by different algorithms. (a) Multi-exposure image sequence Mountain garden; (b) algorithm 1;(c) algorithm 2; (d) algorithm 3; (e) algorithm 4; (f) algorithm 5; (g) algorithm 6; (h) algorithm 7; (i) proposed algorithm
    Fusion and ablation experimental results of multi-exposure image sequence Venice. (a) Multi-exposure image sequence Venice; (b) fusion result of proposed algorithm; (c) fusion result without guided filtering; (d) fusion result without structural weight; (e) fusion result without saturation weight; (f) fusion result without exposure weight
    Relationship between MEF-SSIM and Gaussian standard deviation
    • Table 1. Comparison of objective indicator average values of different algorithms on three datasets

      View table

      Table 1. Comparison of objective indicator average values of different algorithms on three datasets

      DatasetEvaluationAlgorithm
      1234567Proposed
      Dataset 1MEF-SSIM0.9790.9720.9830.9780.9660.9830.9750.983
      CE1.8841.7071.6591.6511.6071.9191.8111.944
      Dataset 2MEF-SSIM0.9740.9330.9790.9230.9560.9780.9680.977
      CE2.3442.2492.0982.2112.0952.4172.3312.479
      Dataset 3MEF-SSIM0.9870.9620.9880.9640.9710.9870.9800.988
      CE2.5982.4752.1732.3211.8352.2162.1802.601
    • Table 2. Comparison of indicators for different element combinations in three datasets

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of indicators for different element combinations in three datasets

      DatasetMEF-SSIMCE
      SEGCEGCSGCSECSEGSEGCEGCSGCSECSEG
      Dataset 10.9750.9810.9820.9820.9831.8121.9121.8741.8971.944
      Dataset 20.9690.9740.9760.9770.9772.2272.4692.4372.4712.479
      Dataset 30.9780.9850.9860.9870.9882.5522.5072.5172.5992.601
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Ruihong Wen, Chunyu Liu, Shuai Liu, Meili Zhou, Yuxin Zhang. Detail-Preserving Multi-Exposure Image Fusion Based on Adaptive Weight[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(18): 1837001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Digital Image Processing

    Received: Nov. 23, 2023

    Accepted: Jan. 18, 2024

    Published Online: Sep. 14, 2024

    The Author Email: Chunyu Liu (mmliucy@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP232552

    CSTR:32186.14.LOP232552

    Topics