Infrared and Laser Engineering, Volume. 51, Issue 8, 20210681(2022)
Multi-layer image decomposition-based image fusion algorithm
Figures & Tables(10)
Fig. 3. Comparison results of each method of the first set of experiments
Fig. 4. Comparison results of each method of the second set of experiments
Fig. 5. Comparison results of each method of the third set of experiments
Table 1. Four types large-scale layers and their spatial frequency and local variance
View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Four types large-scale layers and their spatial frequency and local variance
Measures SF LV $ FS_{IR}^{\left( i \right)} $ $ SF_{FIR}^{\left( i \right)} $ $ LV_{FIR}^{\left( i \right)} $ $ FS_{Vis}^{\left( i \right)} $ $ SF_{FVis}^{\left( i \right)} $ $ LV_{FVis}^{\left( i \right)} $ $ CS_{IR}^{\left( i \right)} $ $ SF_{CIR}^{\left( i \right)} $ $ LV_{CIR}^{\left( i \right)} $ $ CS_{Vis}^{\left( i \right)} $ $ SF_{CVis}^{\left( i \right)} $ $ LV_{CVis}^{\left( i \right)} $
Table 2. Quantitative comparison results of the first group of experiment
View tableView in ArticleTable 2. Quantitative comparison results of the first group of experiment
NSCT GIF GTF HMSD IHMSD Proposed EN 6.2409 6.3778 6.6779 6.6001 6.715 8 6.6007 SSIM 0.9989 0.9992 0.9991 0.9991 0.9991 0.9992 MI 1.6053 1.5275 2.0508 1.7595 1.7846 1.7883 QT 0.3623 0.4371 0.4358 0.4467 0.4520 0.4538 VIF 0.3199 0.2834 0.2185 0.4403 0.4319 0.4404
Table 3. Quantitative comparison results of the second group of experiment
View tableView in ArticleTable 3. Quantitative comparison results of the second group of experiment
NSCT GIF GTF HMSD IHMSD Proposed EN 6.5306 6.8575 6.9582 6.9566 6.9594 6.9643 SSIM 0.9990 0.9990 0.9991 0.9991 0.9992 0.9992 MI 2.1427 2.4550 2.5011 2.2770 2.2813 2.2845 QT 0.3323 0.4514 0.3145 0.4437 0.4472 0.4301 VIF 0.2966 0.2801 0.1843 0.3465 0.4350 0.3487
Table 4. Quantitative comparison results of the third group of experiment
View tableView in ArticleTable 4. Quantitative comparison results of the third group of experiment
NSCT GIF GTF HMSD IHMSD Proposed EN 6.4850 7.0175 7.0766 7.1275 7.1333 7.2041 SSIM 0.9985 0.9988 0.9988 0.9985 0.9988 0.9989 MI 1.8187 2.8373 2.0651 2.8486 2.8973 2.2845 QT 0.3357 0.4521 0.3360 0.4103 0.4206 0.4301 VIF 0.2704 0.1087 0.3276 0.3849 0.3943 0.3487
Table 5. Time consumption of different fusion algorithm (Unit: s)
View tableView in ArticleTable 5. Time consumption of different fusion algorithm (Unit: s)
NSCT GIF GTF HMSD IHMSD Proposed First set 5.365 0.368 2.130 20.322 16.544 8.524 Second set 14.226 1.303 6.852 48.094 37.212 19.685 Third set 14.062 1.205 9.821 49.020 43.395 21.397
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Wei Tan, Chuang Song, Jiajia Zhao, Xinkai Liang. Multi-layer image decomposition-based image fusion algorithm[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(8): 20210681
Paper Information
Category: Image processing
Received: Jan. 20, 2022
Accepted: --
Published Online: Jan. 9, 2023
The Author Email: Tan Wei (twtanwei1992@163.com)
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20