Chinese Journal of Liquid Crystals and Displays, Volume. 40, Issue 5, 761(2025)
Image dehazing algorithm combining fog concentration segmentation and atmospheric light curtain mapping
Figures & Tables(17)
Fig. 2. Variation of saturation and chromacity with fog concentration
Fig. 5. Fog concentration distribution maps and restoration effect maps
Fig. 11. Comparison of restoration results of natural fog images with drastic changes in depth of field
Fig. 12. Comparison of haze images recovery results in the sky area
Table 1. Objective evaluation on index
and of eight algorithms View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Objective evaluation on index
and of eight algorithms 算法 评价指标 图像 平均 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 He e 0.130 0.073 0.134 0.228 0.031 0.115 0.057 0.066 0.207 0.105 0.115 r 1.927 1.730 1.790 2.174 1.492 1.810 1.468 1.550 2.012 1.855 1.781 Zhu e 0.027 0.018 0.023 0.020 0.011 0.022 0.020 0.010 0.011 0.025 0.019 r 1.349 1.250 1.288 1.283 1.252 1.319 1.289 1.249 1.291 1.295 1.287 Tarel e 0.287 0.053 0.120 0.240 0.025 0.097 0.088 0.0468 0.114 0.089 0.116 r 2.188 1.513 1.610 2.152 1.461 1.774 1.543 1.363 1.557 1.519 1.668 Qin e 0.061 -0.09 0.039 0.030 -0.047 -0.010 0.030 0.016 0.090 0.034 0.015 r 1.461 1.134 1.143 1.188 1.092 1.061 1.225 1.228 1.298 1.367 1.220 Bai e 0.012 0.025 0.038 0.045 0.004 0.009 0.019 0.005 0.048 0.103 0.031 r 1.089 1.136 1.154 1.145 1.017 1.021 1.089 1.023 1.354 1.316 1.134 Zhang e 0.012 0.059 0.007 0.181 -0.017 -0.021 -0.288 0.040 0.138 -0.123 -0.001 r 1.563 1.770 1.506 2.018 1.382 1.488 1.280 1.484 1.681 1.578 1.575 Yang e 0.008 0.017 0.018 0.014 0.064 0.093 0.096 0.178 0.102 0.011 0.060 r 1.257 1.222 1.231 1.248 1.230 1.204 1.233 1.250 1.224 1.210 1.231 Ours e 0.293 0.061 0.145 0.277 0.041 0.081 0.062 0.085 0.269 0.104 0.142 r 2.267 1.781 1.801 2.390 1.503 1.545 1.454 1.546 2.035 1.806 1.813
Table 2. Objective evaluation on index
and of eight algorithms View tableView in ArticleTable 2. Objective evaluation on index
and of eight algorithms 算法 评价指标 图像 平均 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 He s 13.285 15.152 12.932 12.627 14.468 14.949 13.696 14.968 15.082 15.088 14.224 t 1.524 0.601 0.951 0.872 1.634 0.324 0.789 0.548 0.524 0.921 0.961 Zhu s 12.989 15.461 13.483 11.724 15.213 15.155 14.594 14.998 14.332 15.550 14.349 t 1.153 0.630 0.912 1.879 1.985 1.074 1.432 0.850 0.997 1.286 1.219 Tarel s 15.480 16.039 13.852 14.057 15.922 16.431 15.255 15.626 15.459 15.837 15.395 t 0.915 0.930 0.732 1.741 1.214 1.010 1.231 0.972 0.121 1.354 1.022 Qin s 15.550 16.700 14.285 13.935 17.090 15.960 16.718 16.507 15.871 16.633 15.924 t 1. 253 0. 352 0. 769 0.832 1. 542 0. 727 0. 680 0. 352 0. 326 0.536 0.740 Bai s 14.216 13.529 13.213 13.166 14.295 13.246 15.411 14.732 15.598 14.717 14.212 t 0. 950 0. 171 0. 589 0. 492 1. 686 0. 986 0. 473 0. 881 0. 691 0. 286 0.721 Zhang s 12.680 14.961 12.208 12.550 14.218 13.351 11.691 14.570 15.052 13.143 13.442 t 1.015 0.830 0.812 1.967 2.634 1.084 1.432 0.850 0.997 1.286 1.290 Yang s 12.644 15.357 13.231 11.360 15.102 14.554 13.973 14.982 13.736 15.140 14.007 t 1.235 0.789 0.824 2.021 2.654 1.184 1.465 0.892 1.230 1.345 1.363 Ours s 15.486 15.961 15.932 15.192 16.471 16.493 15.348 15.963 16.989 15.956 15.978 t 0.925 0. 352 0. 869 0.827 1.491 0. 722 0. 695 0. 315 0. 218 0.341 0.676
Table 3. Objective evaluation on index
， and of eight algorithms View tableView in ArticleTable 3. Objective evaluation on index
， and of eight algorithms 算法 评价指标 图像 平均 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 He 9.104 9.301 9.786 8.057 7.720 7.918 6.809 7.261 8.335 8.914 8.321 24.089 83.750 51.875 56.25 81.923 63.461 57.085 56.153 64.170 75.333 61.408 0.575 0.715 0.599 0.517 0.206 0.415 0.728 0.340 0.515 0.385 0.499 Zhu 2.472 8.503 6.743 3.581 8.073 5.116 6.238 7.028 3.867 6.509 5.813 41.902 66.750 42.500 23.125 67.115 46.153 47.368 39.230 18.421 52.333 44.489 0.075 0.100 0.114 0.038 0.096 0.173 0.126 0.065 0.042 0.124 0.095 Tarel 7.805 9.833 9.054 8.065 9.741 6.851 6.720 8.451 5.189 8.341 8.005 36.842 86.500 67.083 56.250 77.115 60.961 60.121 45.961 37.651 73.000 60.148 0.33 0.216 0.245 0.296 0.079 0.237 0.119 0.414 0.116 0.299 0.235 Qin 9.681 8.072 10.156 4.217 7.834 4.567 6.111 8.113 6.245 10.179 7.517 19.433 59.250 50.000 25.000 63.076 33.269 48.785 40.769 36.639 65.500 44.172 0.951 0.039 0.938 0.080 0.015 0.028 0.266 0.525 0.224 0.758 0.382 Bai 6.012 5.923 7.312 5.085 8.074 4.768 6.128 7.511 8.423 6.601 6.583 31.258 36.112 43.152 29.687 65.384 35.961 46.558 38.076 63.833 39.676 42.969 0.109 0.535 0.314 0.1195 0.044 0.045 0.112 0.033 0.405 0.256 0.197 Zhang 2.359 10.400 9.841 10.431 11.033 6.450 7.504 9.134 7.545 8.408 8.310 54.858 89.000 34.791 52.343 71.153 33.461 33.805 50.961 55.870 58.333 53.457 0.611 0.776 0.786 0.996 0.079 0.280 0.701 0.854 0.711 0.055 0.585 Yang 2.187 8.288 6.384 3.018 7.832 4.701 6.994 7.086 3.607 6.355 5.645 36.639 64.250 37.708 60.000 66.153 35.384 42.510 40.384 16.801 48.666 44.849 0.002 0.025 0.019 0.009 0.031 0.021 0.032 0.03 0.012 0.025 0.021 Ours 7.637 10.501 9.986 9.330 10.620 5.849 7.867 8.178 7.575 8.831 8.637 47.166 89.100 81.87 65.156 81.923 56.923 55.870 62.692 73.076 77.500 69.127 0.838 0.876 0.699 0.781 0.706 0.347 0.814 0.316 0.656 0.733 0.677
Table 4. Comparison of
and metrics for synthetic haze images View tableView in ArticleTable 4. Comparison of
and metrics for synthetic haze images 评价指标 He Zhu Tarel Qin Bai Zhang Yang Ours 0.867 0.922 0.884 0.942 0.893 0.779 0.916 0.906 14.492 17.571 15.835 19.496 19.107 15.792 17.834 19.384
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Lanlan WANG, Yan YANG. Image dehazing algorithm combining fog concentration segmentation and atmospheric light curtain mapping[J]. Chinese Journal of Liquid Crystals and Displays, 2025, 40(5): 761
Paper Information
Category:
Received: Sep. 4, 2024
Accepted: --
Published Online: Jun. 18, 2025
The Author Email: Lanlan WANG (2892470358@qq.com)
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20