Infrared and Laser Engineering, Volume. 54, Issue 8, 20250217(2025)
Mural restoration via joint gated attention and residual dense transformer
Figures & Tables(11)
Fig. 6. Comparison chart of the restoration results of each algorithm under different mask rates
Fig. 9. Comparison chart of actual damage repair experiment results
Table 1. Quantitative comparison of various repair algorithms under different mask rates
View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Quantitative comparison of various repair algorithms under different mask rates
Mask rate/Contrast algorithm Evaluation indicators PSNR↑ SSIM↑ L1↓ LPIPS↓ FID↓ 1%-10% MISF 29.9381 0.8696 0.0204 0.0482 28.7383 HINT 30.6907 0.9219 0.0179 0.0415 24.0503 PUT 30.7328 0.9314 0.0137 0.0312 14.9842 CTSDG 31.1378 0.9330 0.0093 0.0286 16.2483 MFCL 32.2550 0.9433 0.0056 0.0266 23.2643 ECDB 31.2853 0.9441 0.0040 0.0241 15.7288 Ours 32.3421 0.9481 0.0035 0.0203 13.8803 10%-20% MISF 26.8004 0.7826 0.0181 0.0658 30.5281 HINT 26.4944 0.7951 0.0207 0.0672 29.3446 PUT 26.3782 0.7837 0.0234 0.0708 19.1685 CTSDG 27.8627 0.8107 0.0155 0.0612 22.0202 MFCL 28.0096 0.8895 0.0108 0.0590 33.8647 ECDB 27.9446 0.8861 0.0129 0.0602 23.6354 Ours 28.1596 0.8984 0.0083 0.0508 17.3776 20%-30% MISF 24.1163 0.8045 0.0238 0.1094 38.6127 HINT 23.8855 0.7145 0.0304 0.1334 32.8419 PUT 23.6941 0.6945 0.0321 0.1391 25.9616 CTSDG 23.9444 0.8005 0.0287 0.1261 33.2993 MFCL 25.0015 0.7328 0.0165 0.1197 43.8647 ECDB 24.3446 0.8110 0.0212 0.1054 29.6425 Ours 24.3480 0.8203 0.0197 0.1026 24.4002 30%-40% MISF 21.6712 0.7196 0.0354 0.1895 43.9497 HINT 21.0316 0.6918 0.0370 0.1560 40.7219 PUT 20.1921 0.6738 0.0385 0.2057 31.7097 CTSDG 21.4247 0.7032 0.0318 0.1993 37.5934 MFCL 23.5651 0.7336 0.0302 0.1854 47.1149 ECDB 21.7703 0.7365 0.0310 0.1630 38.4061 Ours 22.0809 0.7404 0.0283 0.1571 27.7772 Powder mask MISF 29.9548 0.8704 0.0198 0.0476 26.7936 HINT 30.1832 0.8721 0.0185 0.0439 23.3275 PUT 30.8921 0.8837 0.0157 0.0392 15.6400 CTSDG 31.2447 0.8983 0.0132 0.0348 18.9128 MFCL 31.8295 0.9102 0.0109 0.0315 24.4925 ECDB 32.2314 0.9174 0.0076 0.0279 19.2198 Ours 32.4127 0.9210 0.0051 0.0253 15.2780
Table 2. Comparison of quantitative results of module ablation experiments
View tableView in ArticleTable 2. Comparison of quantitative results of module ablation experiments
LAG RDTB PSNR↑ SSIM↑ L1↓ LPIPS↓ FID↓ MAC↓ Parameter↓ Time/epoch·s−1↓ Time(per image)↓ × × 27.9446 0.8861 0.0129 0.0602 23.6354 152 G 279 M 378 5.22 s √ × 27.9985 0.8877 0.0106 0.0524 20.0358 133 G 215 M 353 3.74 s × √ 28.1383 0.8980 0.0075 0.0518 19.2871 130 G 207 M 347 3.61 s √ √ 28.1596 0.8984 0.0083 0.0508 17.3776 122 G 202 M 316 3.43 s
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Zhongmin LIU, Yang LIU, Wenjin HU. Mural restoration via joint gated attention and residual dense transformer[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2025, 54(8): 20250217
Paper Information
Category: Optical imaging, display and information processing
Received: Mar. 24, 2025
Accepted: --
Published Online: Aug. 29, 2025
The Author Email: Zhongmin LIU (liuzhmx@163.com)
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20