Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 61, Issue 18, 1815003(2024)

Surgical Robotic Arm Guidance System Based on Point Laser Precise Navigation

Kefu Song1,2, Rui Tang1, Feifei Guo3, Zexin Shen1, Huixiong Zeng1, and Jun Li1,3、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fuzhou 350117, Fujian, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Quanzhou Vocational and Technical University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(18)
    Principle of multi-stage small object detection
    SRCNN network framework
    Comparison of traditional algorithm and optimization algorithm framework. (a) Mainstream multi-scale target recognition architecture; (b) feature aggregation and single scale recognition improvement strategies
    RRT and RRT* search process. (a) RRT; (b) RRT*
    RRT*-Connect with target bias strategy
    Path planning. (a) Path optimization; (b) path smoothing
    Robotic arm and obstacle bounding box model
    Simulated lesion point cloud image. (a) Processed point cloud image; (b) normal vector image of the lesion surface
    Surgical robotic arm guidance system
    System flow chart
    Comparison of recognition results. (a) Intel RealSense Viewer; (b) bright condition; (c) dark condition
    Search process and results. (a) RRT*; (b) RRT-Connect; (c) BT-RRT*; (d) proposed algorithm
    Comparison of simulation results. (a) No constraint strategy applied; (b) constraint strategy applied
    Experimental results in actual scene. (a) No constraint strategy applied; (b) constraint strategy applied
    • Table 1. Results of ablation experiment

      View table

      Table 1. Results of ablation experiment

      SRCNNFeature aggregation and single scale recognitionAP50 /%AP70 /%Recognition speed /(frame/s)
      88.464.477.8
      98.791.449.9
      87.564.3116.3
      97.683.578.9
    • Table 2. Comparison of recognition results of different algorithms

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of recognition results of different algorithms

      AlgorithmAP50 /%AP70 /%Recognition speed /(frame/s)
      ATSS85.451.324.6
      YOLOv486.547.150.4
      Standard YOLOX88.464.477.8
      YOLOv590.459.364.5
      Faster R-CNN96.870.921.9
      Proposed97.683.578.9
    • Table 3. Identification data comparison

      View table

      Table 3. Identification data comparison

      Serial numberActual positionCalculation results of proposed algorithm
      X,Y,ZXB,YB,ZBXDYDZD
      1(-0.018,-0.010,0.326)(-0.0184,-0.0104,0.326)(-0.0179,-0.0104,0.326)
      2(-0.008,-0.006,0.325)(-0.0085,-0.0062,0.325)(-0.0084,-0.0062,0.326)
      3(-0.004,-0.013,0.326)(-0.0042,-0.0135,0.326)(-0.0047,-0.0131,0.327)
    • Table 4. Comparison of simulation results

      View table

      Table 4. Comparison of simulation results

      AlgorithmStep size /cmAverage planning time /sAverage number of iterationsAverage active nodesAverage path cost /cm
      RRT*56.4003065.4226.16200.69
      100.245567.9823.90232.98
      200.029122.6812.42235.98
      RRT-Connect54.1833060.9848.04235.74
      100.149780.2824.84237.47
      200.027165.2613.36243.27
      BT-RRT*50.107181.5028.64186.56
      100.02468.8420.76202.38
      200.01329.4011.10210.31
      Proposed50.06594.0625.46188.00
      100.01736.5620.26206.01
      200.00916.269.62198.23
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Kefu Song, Rui Tang, Feifei Guo, Zexin Shen, Huixiong Zeng, Jun Li. Surgical Robotic Arm Guidance System Based on Point Laser Precise Navigation[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(18): 1815003

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Machine Vision

    Received: Dec. 21, 2023

    Accepted: Feb. 29, 2024

    Published Online: Sep. 9, 2024

    The Author Email: Jun Li (junli@fjirsm.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP232708

    CSTR:32186.14.LOP232708

    Topics