Journal of Inorganic Materials, Volume. 37, Issue 10, 1051(2022)
Figures & Tables(11)
1. Particle size distribution of TiO2 sols prepared with different acid/titanium ratios (x )
2. Surface and cross-section SEM images of TiO2 membranes prepared with different acid/titanium ratios
3. Particle size distribution of TiO2 sols (S0.25) after ultrasound treatment for different periods
4. Surface and cross-section SEM images of TiO2 membranes prepared by sonication for different periods
5. Schematic diagram of proposed formation mechanism of TiO2 membranes prepared by conventional and ultrasound-assisted Sol-Gel methods
6. XRD patterns of TiO2 powders calcined at different temperatures
7. Surface SEM and 3D morphologies of TiO2 membranes calcined at different temperatures
8. Dextran rejection of TiO2 membranes prepared with different acid/titanium ratios
9. Dextran rejection of TiO2 membranes prepared by sonication for different periods
10. Dextran rejection of TiO2 membranes calcined at different temperatures
Table 1. Comparison between TiO2 membranes prepared by conventional and ultrasound-assisted sol-gel method
View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Comparison between TiO2 membranes prepared by conventional and ultrasound-assisted sol-gel method
Membrane Membrane configuration Calcination temperature/℃ Pore size / nm Thickness/ μm Coating number Water flux/ (L·m-2·h-1·bar-1) MWCO/ Da Ref. P25-TiO2 Tube 400 3.6 2 4 128 5600 [ 12 ]MXene-TiO2 Tube 400 6.5 5 1 90 22000 [ 15 ]P123-TiO2 Tube 400 6.1 2 3 7.16 19000 [ 19 ]CM0.5-0-350 Hollow fiber 350 4.4 5 3 142 9078 This work UM0.25-30-350 Hollow fiber 350 2.5 1 2 145 2586 This work
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Qingyang LÜ, Yuting ZHANG, Xuehong GU.
Paper Information
Category: RESEARCH ARTICLE
Received: Apr. 3, 2022
Accepted: --
Published Online: Jan. 12, 2023
The Author Email: Xuehong GU (xhgu@njtech.edu.cn)
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20