Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 49, Issue 10, 1002404(2022)
Mechanism and Research Advances of Water-Jet Guided Laser Micromachining
Fig. 1. Working principle of water-jet guided laser (WJGL) processing technology[22]
Fig. 2. Nozzle structures for forming jet. (a) Schematic of vena-contracta[32]; (b) cylindrical nozzle; (c) cone nozzle;(d) cone-up nozzle; (e) cone-down nozzle
Fig. 5. Relationship between laser energy transmission efficiency and water beam length under different laser power densities[44]
Fig. 7. Coupling of light and water jet. (a) Schematic of lateral error[50]; (b) schematic of vertical spacing error[50]; (c) schematic of axial angle error[50]; (d) schematic of end face angle error[50]; (e) schematic of near-field coupling[29]; (f) schematic of far-field coupling[29]; (g) schematic of end-face coupling[29]
Fig. 8. Distribution of laser in water jet. (a) Intensity distribution under different numerical apertures, eccentric distances and water jet diameters[51]; (b) diagrams of test results of laser and water jet coupling under different jet diameters[53] (wavelength is 532 nm, numerical aperture is 0.665, and L epresents energy loss rate)
Fig. 9. Processed surface morphologies of traditional metal materials. (a) Comparison of surface morphology of stainless steel processed by electrical discharge machining (EDM) and water-jet guided laser (WJGL) cutting[55]; (b) comparison of hole edge quality of stainless steel processed by“dry laser”and WJGL[56]; (c) comparison of surface quality of aluminum, stainless steel, and brass under the same technological parameters (working distance is 90 mm)[58]
Fig. 10. Processed surface morphologies of metal materials used in aerospace field. (a) SEM images of incision cross-section of titanium alloy cut by“dry laser”and WJGL[60]; (b) detailed illustration of the“wall effect”[61]; (c) SEM images of recast layers of holes processed by“dry laser”,EDM, and WJGL processes[62]; (d) high density dislocations and cross mechanical twins under SEM[64]; (e) effect of pulse frequency on coating delamination[65]
Fig. 11. Processing results of semiconductor materials. (a) Comparison of the front surface quality of sawn and WJGL-cut of gallium arsenide [66]; (b) comparison of cross-sectional topography of scribed silicon wafers at different feeding speeds obtained by simulation and experiment[67]; (c) temperature field and material removal simulation results obtained under different water jet thermal conductivity coefficients[68]; (d) density wave distribution after 1.65 ps at the start of processing[69]; (e)“V”-shaped cross-section obtained by scribing grooves on silicon wafer by WJGL[70]
Fig. 12. Processing results of composite materials. (a) Morphology characteristics of hole section obtained by processing Al MMC with WJGL and millisecond pulse laser[72]; (b) comparison of cutting surface appearance obtained by WJGL and“dry laser”cutting CFRP[73]; (c)“rectangular scaning”and“parallel scanning”strategies and their corresponding slit morphologies[74]; (d) overall appearance of the slit after 4 mm thick CFRP processing[76]; (e) partially enlarged cross-sectional topography of CMCs processed under different gas atmospheres[39]
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Shuiwang Wang, Ye Ding, Bai Cheng, Yuan Li, Lijun Yang. Mechanism and Research Advances of Water-Jet Guided Laser Micromachining[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2022, 49(10): 1002404
Category:
Received: Nov. 11, 2021
Accepted: Dec. 22, 2021
Published Online: May. 9, 2022
The Author Email: Ding Ye (dy1992hit@hit.edu.cn), Yang Lijun (yljtj@hit.edu.cn)