Fig. 1. Three surface texture models. (a) Sq＋Ci; (b) Sq＋Tr; (c) Ci＋Tr

Fig. 2. 3D profiles of different complex texture surfaces. (a) Sq＋Ci; (b) Sq＋Tr; (c) Ci＋Tr

Fig. 3. SEM microtopographies of the textured surface of Sq＋Ci under different magnifications. (a) 500×；(b) 2000×；(c) 10000×

Fig. 4. Relationships of hydrophobicity of different complex texture surfaces and size. (a) Contact angle; (b) rolling angle

Fig. 5. Mechanism of the effects of weave size and spacing on contact angle and rolling angle

Fig. 6. Freezing time of water droplets on three complex texture surfaces with different sizes

Fig. 7. Freezing time and contact angle of water droplets on the original surface and three complex texture surfaces at－10 ℃

Fig. 8. Adhesion of original surface and three complex texture surfaces at－10 ℃ and adhesion measuring device model. (a) Adhesion distribution; (b) measuring device model

Fig. 9. Curves of contact angle on different sample surfaces changed with temperature and optical image

Fig. 10. Freezing time of droplets on three optimal texture surfaces at different temperatures

Fig. 11. Contact angle and freezing time after multiple icing and deicing