NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, Volume. 48, Issue 7, 070029(2025)

Multi-objective structural optimization design method for SCO2-PCHE

Congyi WEN, Ziyan ZHAO, Zijing LIU, and Pengcheng ZHAO*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(15)
    Structural diagram of flow channel
    Diagram of geometric parameter of flow passage
    Schematics of meshing for geometric model
    Mesh sensitivity analysis of heat channel fluid mass weighted average temperature (a) and pressure drop (b)
    Optimization flow chart
    Line chart of range analysis (color online)(a) SCO2-PCHE heat transfer coefficient, (b) SCO2-PCHE pressure drop
    SPEA2 Pareto curve
    Pareto curves of SPEA2, OMOPSO and NSGA-II algorithms
    • Table 1. The relationship of SCO2 physical parameters

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. The relationship of SCO2 physical parameters

      物性Physical properties关系式Relationships
      ρ / kg·m-38.528 3×10-9T4-2.095 2×10-5T3+0.019 42T2-8.175T+1 402
      cp / J·(kg·K)-1-5.647 6×10-10T5+1.667 4×10-6T4-1.957 3×10-3T3+1.143T2-332.24T+39 583
      λ / W·(m·K)-17.16×10-5T+0.000 69
      μ / Pa·s3.65×10-8T+6.65×10-6
    • Table 2. Range of structural parameters

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Range of structural parameters

      项目Item直径D / mm转折角θ / (°)高Ht / mm上底Ls / mm节数N
      上限Upper limiting value55033.545
      下限Lower limiting value13011.525
    • Table 3. Factor level

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Factor level

      因素水平

      Factor level

      直径

      D / mm

      转折角

      θ / (°)

      Ht / mm

      上底

      Ls / mm

      节数

      N

      11301.01.525
      22351.52.030
      33402.02.535
      44452.53.040
      55503.03.545
    • Table 4. Orthogonal experimental

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Orthogonal experimental

      样本Sample直径D / mm转折角θ / (°)高Ht / mm上底Ls / mm节数N换热系数h / W·(m2·K)-1压降∆P / kPa
      11301.01.52512 910.77139.86
      21351.52.03015 155.18236.39
      31402.02.53516 559.53387.40
      41452.53.04017 803.37622.58
      51503.03.54519 014.07971.12
      62301.52.5404 518.7813.46
      72352.03.0455 060.1320.32
      82402.53.5254 577.6616.08
      92453.01.5305 469.4428.57
      102501.02.0354 379.6336.62
      113302.03.5302 390.542.12
      123352.51.5352 919.833.53
      133403.02.0403 170.024.89
      143451.02.5452 464.986.45
      153501.53.0252 028.755.51
      164302.52.0451 941.071.05
      174353.02.5251 700.220.84
      184401.03.0301 391.850.99
      194451.53.5351 549.491.63
      204502.01.5402 435.523.49
      215303.03.0351 315.610.35
      225351.03.5401 021.310.33
      235401.51.5451 662.110.96
      245452.02.0251 397.360.71
      255502.52.5301 584.890.93
    • Table 5. R2 and RMSE corresponding to different surrogate models

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. R2 and RMSE corresponding to different surrogate models

      项目

      Item

      换热系数幂律代理模型

      Power-law surrogate model of heat transfer coefficient

      压降幂律代理模型

      Pressure drop power law proxy model

      换热系数仿射幂律代理模型

      Heat transfer coefficient affine power law surrogate model

      压降仿射幂律代理模型

      Pressure drop affine power law surrogate model

      R20.999 20.999 80.999 60.999 9
      RMSE157.553 097.79110.71227.92
    • Table 6. The structural parameters and heat transfer performance of the structural design schemes corresponding to points A, B and C

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. The structural parameters and heat transfer performance of the structural design schemes corresponding to points A, B and C

      项目ItemABC
      D / mm1.001.004.89
      θ / (°)46.0930.09130.09
      Ht / mm2.962.991.74
      Ls / mm1.501.501.50
      N43.6225.4225.42
      h / W·(m2·K)-121 128.6316 575.531 273.48
      P / kPa767.24173.260.37
    • Table 7. Optimization performance comparison of SPEA2, OMOPSO and NSGA-II algorithms

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 7. Optimization performance comparison of SPEA2, OMOPSO and NSGA-II algorithms

      性能评价指标

      Performance evaluation index

      无优化算法

      No optimization algorithm

      OMOPSONSGA-IISPEA2
      换热系数h / W·(m2·K)-115 155.1811 910.0610 013.6416 575.53
      压降ΔP / kPa236.39265.62201.27173.26
      JF因子JF factor10.760.701.21
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Congyi WEN, Ziyan ZHAO, Zijing LIU, Pengcheng ZHAO. Multi-objective structural optimization design method for SCO2-PCHE[J]. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, 2025, 48(7): 070029

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Special Issue on The First Academic Annual Conference of the Research Reactor and Innovative Reactor Association of Chinese Nuclear Society and Advanced Nuclear Power System Reactor Engineering

    Received: Aug. 29, 2024

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Sep. 15, 2025

    The Author Email: Pengcheng ZHAO (ZHAOPengcheng)

    DOI:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2025.hjs.48.240350

    Topics