Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, Volume. 45, Issue 4, 9(2024)

Shape Optimization Design of Small Cargo Re-entry Capsule

Yifan WANG, Wei JIN, and Hongbiao LIU
Author Affiliations
  • Beijing Zhongke Aerospace Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100074, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    • Table 1. Comparison of calculated results with data in references

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Comparison of calculated results with data in references

      数据类别CACNCm0CL/CD
      计算值1.352 60.152 10.102 1−0.246 2
      试验值[20]1.334 60.159 00.102 5−0.237 4
      相对误差/%−1.354.400.39−3.71
    • Table 2. Comparison between different optimization techniques

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Comparison between different optimization techniques

      来源气动力模块优化算法Rn/mLF/mθF/(°)CDCLCL/CDRV
      文献[5]CART3DMIGA+MMFD0.503.0021.460.51100.40900.80100.8019
      本文修正牛顿理论MIGA+MMFD0.502.9823.170.50880.40770.80150.8192
      本文修正牛顿理论MIGA+NLQPL0.512.6224.310.50240.40520.80650.8144
      本文修正牛顿理论纯MIGA0.562.4324.310.50590.40490.80040.8109
    • Table 3. Design variables and their variation range

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Design variables and their variation range

      设计变量最大截面直径dm/m球冠钝度$ \overline {{R_{\text{n}}}} $肩部半径比$ \overline {{R_{\text{c}}}} $长细比λ倒锥角θc/(°)
      下界1.000.800.030.807.00
      上界1.501.200.051.2019.00
    • Table 4. Comparison of single objective optimization solution and initial solution

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Comparison of single objective optimization solution and initial solution

      目标状态dm/m$ \overline {{R_{\text{n}}}} $θc/(°)$ \overline {{R_{\text{c}}}} $$ \lambda $V/m3RVCL/CDCD
      初始外形1.100.907.000.041.000.665 40.942 40.243 71.322 3
      MIGA优化外形1.431.1618.590.030.871.082 00.912 70.308 41.395 0
      MMFD更优外形1.431.1618.780.030.871.078 30.911 70.308 51.394 9
      NLPQL更优外形1.431.2018.610.030.921.118 40.903 50.311 21.404 6
    • Table 5. The comparison between Pareto solutions and initial solution

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. The comparison between Pareto solutions and initial solution

      外形状态dm/m$ \overline {{R_{\text{n}}}} $θc/(°)$ \overline {{R_{\text{c}}}} $$ \lambda $V/m3RVqc/(kW·m−2CL/CDCD
      初始值1.100.907.000.041.000.665 40.942 4491.2060.243 71.322 3
      A点1.461.2016.530.031.011.326 90.900 1368.8840.310 01.407 7
      B点1.501.2010.500.031.011.611 70.922 5364.7410.296 01.411 2
      C点1.481.207.020.031.011.678 70.923 9366.0630.279 11.417 3
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yifan WANG, Wei JIN, Hongbiao LIU. Shape Optimization Design of Small Cargo Re-entry Capsule[J]. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, 2024, 45(4): 9

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Aug. 31, 2023

    Accepted: Aug. 31, 2023

    Published Online: Nov. 1, 2024

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8518.2024.04.002

    Topics