NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, Volume. 47, Issue 6, 060603(2024)

Motion characteristics and drag coefficient of bubbles in liquid lead-bismuth eutectic

Haotian LUO1, Li LIU1、*, Junjie YUAN1, Ruiqi BAO1, Xiaoyan TIAN2, Da LI2, and Hanyang GU1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 2Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi'an 710024, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(18)
    Calculation model
    Grid independence verification (a) Bubble phase profile at 50 ms, (b) Bubble trajectory
    Comparison of bubble migrations (a) Experimental results, (b) Simulation results
    Comparisons of bubble behaviors (a) Cross-sectional area comparison, (b) Perimeter comparison, (c) Trajectory comparison
    Deformation of bubbles in LBE under different conditions (a) Jet process, (b) Deformation of bubbles under different jet pressures (TLBE = 573 K, Pinlet = 5 MPa; TLBE = 573 K, Pinlet = 20 MPa), (c) Deformation of bubbles under different LBE temperatures (TLBE = 573 K, Pinlet = 10 MPa; TLBE = 773 K, Pinlet = 10 MPa)
    Velocities of bubbles in LBE under different conditions (a) Effect of jet pressure on bubble velocity (TLBE = 573 K), (b) Effect of LBE temperature on bubble velocity (Pinlet = 10 MPa)
    Trajectories of bubbles in LBE under different conditions (a) Effect of jet pressure on bubble trajectory (TLBE = 573 K), (b) Effect of LBE temperature on bubble trajectory (Pinlet = 10 MPa)
    Aspect ratios of bubbles in LBE under different conditions (a) Effect of jet pressure on bubble aspect ratio (TLBE = 573 K), (b) Effect of LBE temperature on bubble aspect ratio (Pinlet = 10 MPa)
    Force analysis of bubbles in LBE
    Diagram of the relationship between bubble equivalent particle size and terminal velocity
    Drag coefficients of different bubbles(a) Relationship between drag coefficient and bubble diameter, (b) Relationship between drag coefficient and Re
    Comparison between simulated drag coefficients and existing model results: models proposed by (a) Ishii and Chawla[6], (b) Tomiyama et al.[9], (c) Wallis et al.[22], (d) Peebles and Garber[7], (e) Mei and Klausner[8], and (f) Turton and Levenspiel[23]
    Applicability analysis of the optimized drag coefficient model
    • Table 1. Simulated working conditions

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Simulated working conditions

      工况Conditions
      12345678910
      Pinlet / MPa5101520101510101010
      TLBE / K573573573573613613653673723773
      Tsteam / K500500500500500500500500500500
      dpipe / mm0.7850.7850.7850.7850.7850.7850.7850.7850.7850.785
    • Table 2. Major dimensionless numbers

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Major dimensionless numbers

      无量纲数

      Dimensionless number

      包含的影响因素

      Influence factors

      Mo=(ρl-ρg)gμl4σ3ρl2

      黏性力、表面张力

      Viscosity, surface tension

      Eo=(ρl-ρg)gd4σ

      重力、表面张力

      Gravity, surface tension

      Re=ρlvTdμl

      惯性力、黏性力

      Inertia, viscosity

      We=ρlvT2dσ

      惯性力、表面张力

      Inertia, surface tension

    • Table 3. Existing drag coefficient models

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Existing drag coefficient models

      相关文献

      Related literature

      曳力系数模型

      Drag coefficient model

      适用范围

      Applicable range

      Ishii和Chawla[6]

      Ishii and Chawla[6]

      CD=max24Re1+0.1Re0.75,min83,23Eo

      10-1<Re<105

      泡状流Bubbly flow

      Peebles和Garber[7]

      Peebles and Garber[7]

      CD=maxmax24Re,18.7Re0.68min[0.0275EoWe2,0.82Eo0.25We0.5]Re<1 200

      Mei和Klausner[8]

      Mei and Klausner[8]

      CD=16Re1+10.173Re0.667+0.4131.16300Re-1.09

      Re<100

      水中单个气泡Single bubble in water

      Tomiyama等[9]

      Tomiyama et al.[9]

      CD=maxmin24Re1+0.15Re0.687,72Re,83EoEo+4

      10-3<Re<105

      水中单个气泡Single bubble in water

      Wallis等[22]

      Wallis et al.[22]

      CD=maxmaxmax16Re,18.7Re0.68,48ReminEo3,0.47Eo0.25We0.5,0.8

      Re<1 000

      水中单个气泡Single bubble in water

      Turton和Levensipiel[23]

      Turton and Levensipiel[23]

      CD=24Re1+10.173Re0.667+0.4131+16300Re-1.09

      Re<130

      刚性气泡Rigid bubble

    • Table 4. Error comparison of drag coefficient models

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Error comparison of drag coefficient models

      曳力系数模型

      Drag coefficient model

      标准偏差

      Standard deviation

      平均误差

      Average error

      Ishii和Chawla[6]

      Ishii and Chawla[6]

      0.156 90.319 4

      Peebles和Garber[7]

      Peebles and Garber[7]

      0.173 60.931 0

      Tomiyama等[9]

      Tomiyama et al.[9]

      0.107 70.249 2

      Wallis等[22]

      Wallis et al.[22]

      0.236 90.439 7
    • Table 5. Correlation between dimensionless numbers and drag coefficients

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Correlation between dimensionless numbers and drag coefficients

      CD=aXb+cabc

      相关系数

      Correlation

      coefficient

      Re1.100.153.020.67
      We1 166.034.27×10-41 165.870.64
      Eo2 653.161.24×10-42 652.600.90
      Mo1.08×10133.85×10110.92-0.07
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Haotian LUO, Li LIU, Junjie YUAN, Ruiqi BAO, Xiaoyan TIAN, Da LI, Hanyang GU. Motion characteristics and drag coefficient of bubbles in liquid lead-bismuth eutectic[J]. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, 2024, 47(6): 060603

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Articles

    Received: Aug. 30, 2023

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Jul. 8, 2024

    The Author Email: LIU Li (刘莉)

    DOI:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2024.hjs.47.060603

    Topics