[2] [2] KRYVENKO P, RUDENKO I, SIKORA P, et al. Alkali-activated cements as sustainable materials for repairing building construction: a review[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 90: 109399.

[4] [4] CAVALETT O, WATANABE M D B, VOLDSUND M, et al. Paving the way for sustainable decarbonization of the European cement industry[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2024, 7: 568-580.

[5] [5] HASSAN A, ARIF M, SHARIQ M. A review of properties and behaviour of reinforced geopolymer concrete structural elements： a clean technology option for sustainable development[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 245: 118762.

[8] [8] NGUYE⌒N H H, NGUYE⌒N P H, LUONG Q H, et al. Mechanical and autogenous healing properties of high-strength and ultra-ductility engineered geopolymer composites reinforced by PE-PVA hybrid fibers[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023, 142: 105155.

[10] [10] HU B, LI Y, LIU Y. Dynamic slant shear bond behavior between new and old concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 238: 117779.

[12] [12] ZANOTTI C, BORGES P H R, BHUTTA A, et al. Bond strength between concrete substrate and metakaolin geopolymer repair mortar: effect of curing regime and PVA fiber reinforcement[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2017, 80: 307-316.

[13] [13] DIAB A M, ABD ELMOATY A E M, TAG ELDIN M R. Slant shear bond strength between self compacting concrete and old concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 130: 73-82.

[14] [14] GAO Z, ZHANG P, WANG J, et al. Interfacial properties of geopolymer mortar and concrete substrate: effect of polyvinyl alcohol fiber and nano-SiO2 contents[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 315: 125735.

[15] [15] LING Y F, WANG K J, LI W G, et al. Effect of slag on the mechanical properties and bond strength of fly ash-based engineered geopolymer composites[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 164: 747-757.

[16] [16] PUERTAS F, PALACIOS M, MANZANO H, et al. A model for the C-A-S-H gel formed in alkali-activated slag cements[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2011, 31(12): 2043-2056.

[17] [17] NMEEK J, MILAUER V, KOPECKY＇ L. Nanoindentation characteristics of alkali-activated aluminosilicate materials[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2011, 33(2): 163-170.

[18] [18] ZHONG H, ZHANG M Z. Engineered geopolymer composites: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023, 135: 104850.

[20] [20] ZANOTTI C, BANTHIA N, PLIZZARI G. Towards sustainable repairs: substrate-repair interface mode-I fracture analysis[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Materials and Structural Systems, 2014, 1(3): 265.

[21] [21] LIM Y M, LI V C. Durable repair of aged infrastructures using trapping mechanism of engineered cementitious composites[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 1997, 19(4): 373-385.

[22] [22] LI F P, YANG Z M, CHEN D F, et al. Research on mechanical properties and micro-mechanism of engineering geopolymers composites (EGCs) incorporated with modified MWCNTs[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 303: 124516.

[23] [23] TIAN J, WU X W, WANG W W, et al. Experimental study and mechanics model of ECC-to-concrete bond interface under tensile loading[J].Composite Structures, 2022, 285: 115203.

[24] [24] WANG B G, FENG H, HUANG H, et al. Bonding properties between fly ash/ slag-based engineering geopolymer composites and concrete[J].Materials, 2023, 16(12): 4232.

[25] [25] AUSTIN S, ROBINS P, PAN Y G. Shear bond testing of concrete repairs[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1999, 29(7): 1067-1076.

[26] [26] KUMAR S, SEKHAR DAS C, LAO J C, et al. Effect of sand content on bond performance of engineered geopolymer composites (EGC) repair material[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 328: 127080.