[1] LEMONS J E. Ceramics: past, present, and future[J]. Bone, 121S(1996).

[2] WILLIAMS D F. The plasticity of biocompatibility[J]. Biomaterials, 296: 122077(2023).

[3] WILLIAMS D. Revisiting the definition of biocompatibility[J]. Med. Device Technol., 10(2003).

[4] WANG Y. Bioadaptability: an innovative concept for biomaterials[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 801(2016).

[5] XU X, JIA Z, ZHENG Y et al. Bioadaptability of biomaterials: aiming at precision medicine[J]. Matter, 2648(2021).

[6] MASTROGIACOMO M, SCAGLIONE S, MARTINETTI R et al. Role of scaffold internal structure on in vivo bone formation in macroporous calcium phosphate bioceramics[J]. Biomaterials, 3230(2006).

[7] TUAN W H, CHEN Y C, HSU P Y et al. Microstructure design for bone void filler[J]. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 869(2022).

[8] DIAO J, OUYANG J, DENG T et al. 3D-plotted beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds with smaller pore sizes improve in vivo bone regeneration and biomechanical properties in a critical-sized calvarial defect rat model[J]. Adv. Healthc. Mater.(2018).

[9] LI M, FU X, GAO H et al. Regulation of an osteon-like concentric microgrooved surface on osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis[J]. Biomaterials, 216: 119269(2019).

[10] XU D, WAN Y, LI Z et al. Tailorable hierarchical structures of biomimetic hydroxyapatite micro/nano particles promoting endocytosis and osteogenic differentiation of stem cells[J]. Biomater. Sci., 3286(2020).

[11] WEI Y, GAO H, HAO L et al. Constructing a Sr²⁺-substituted surface hydroxyapatite hexagon-like microarray on 3D-plotted hydroxyapatite scaffold to regulate osteogenic differentiation[J]. Nanomaterials (Basel), 1672(2020).

[12] LIU X, ZHAO N, LIANG H et al. Bone tissue engineering scaffolds with HUVECs/hBMSCs cocultured on 3D-printed composite bioactive ceramic scaffolds promoted osteogenesis/ angiogenesis[J]. J. Orthop. Translat., 37: 152(2022).

[13] LU Q, DIAO J, WANG Y et al. 3D printed pore morphology mediates bone marrow stem cell behaviors via RhoA/ROCK2 signaling pathway for accelerating bone regeneration[J]. Bioact. Mater., 26: 413(2023).

[14] DIAO J J, DING H W, HUANG M Q et al. Bone defect model dependent optimal pore sizes of 3D-plotted beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration[J]. Small Methods, 11(2019).

[15] SONG C, LIU L, DENG Z et al. Research progress on the design and performance of porous titanium alloy bone implants[J]. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 23: 2626(2023).

[16] LIN K, CHEN L, QU H et al. Improvement of mechanical properties of macroporous β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramic scaffolds with uniform and interconnected pore structures[J]. Ceram. Int., 2397(2011).

[17] LU J, WANG Z[M]. Microstructure of bioceramics:biological effects and clinical application, 26(2020).

[18] MOHAMMADI H, SEPANTAFAR M, MUHAMAD N et al. How does scaffold porosity conduct bone tissue regeneration[J]. Adv. Eng. Mater., 2100463(2021).

[19] LU J X, FLAUTRE B, ANSELME K et al. Role of interconnections in porous bioceramics on bone recolonization in vitro and in vivo[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 111(1999).

[20] CHA J M, HWANG Y S, KANG D K et al. Development of a novel perfusion rotating wall vessel bioreactor with ultrasound stimulation for mass-production of mineralized tissue constructs[J]. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 739(2022).

[21] XIE Y, HARDOUIN P, ZHU Z et al. Three-dimensional flow perfusion culture system for stem cell proliferation inside the critical-size beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold[J]. Tissue Eng., 3535(2006).

[22] XIE Y, ZHU Z, TANG T et al. Using perfusion bioreactor for mesenchymal stem cell proliferation in large tricalcium phosphate scaffold[J]. Chinese J. Orthop., 1633(2006).

[23] FORRESTAL D P, ALLENBY M C, SIMPSON B et al. Personalized volumetric tissue generation by enhancing multiscale mass transport through 3D printed scaffolds in perfused bioreactors[J]. Adv. Healthc. Mater.(2022).

[24] ENGEL N, FECHNER C, VOGES A et al. An optimized 3D-printed perfusion bioreactor for homogeneous cell seeding in bone substitute scaffolds for future chairside applications[J]. Sci. Rep., 22228(2021).

[25] DING M, KOROMA K E, WENDT D et al. Efficacy of bioreactor-activated bone substitute with bone marrow nuclear cells on fusion rate and fusion mass microarchitecture in sheep[J]. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 1862(2022).

[26] KAZIMIERCZAK P, PRZEKORA A. Bioengineered living bone grafts: a concise review on bioreactors and production techniques in vitro[J]. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 1765(2022).

[27] ZHANG Z, DU J, WEI Z et al. Numerical simulation of dynamic seeding of mesenchymal stem cells in pore structure[J]. Comput. & Mathemat. Appl., 88(2020).

[28] KUBOKI Y, JIN Q M, TAKITA H. Geometry of carriers controlling phenotypic expression in BMP-induced osteogenesis and chondrogenesis[J]. Bone and Joint Surg.-Am., 83A: S105(2001).

[29] MAHAPATRA C, KUMAR P, PAUL M K et al. Angiogenic stimulation strategies in bone tissue regeneration[J]. Tissue Cell, 79: 101908(2022).

[30] GUERRERO J, MAEVSKAIA E, GHAYOR C et al. Influence of scaffold microarchitecture on angiogenesis and regulation of cell differentiation during the early phase of bone healing: a transcriptomics and histological analysis[J]. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 6000(2023).

[31] BAI F, WANG Z, LU J et al. The correlation between the internal structure and vascularization of controllable porous bioceramic materials in vivo: a quantitative study[J]. Tissue Eng. Part A, 3791(2010).

[32] CHOI S W, ZHANG Y, MACEWAN M R et al. Neovascularization in biodegradable inverse opal scaffolds with uniform and precisely controlled pore sizes[J]. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 145(2013).

[33] SHEN M, LI Y, LU F et al. Bioceramic scaffolds with triply periodic minimal surface architectures guide early-stage bone regeneration[J]. Bioact. Mater., 25: 374(2023).

[34] LUTZWEILER G, NDREU HALILI A, ENGIN VRANA N. The overview of porous, bioactive scaffolds as instructive biomaterials for tissue regeneration and their clinical translation[J]. Pharmaceutics, 602(2020).

[35] XIAO X, WANG W, LIU D et al. The promotion of angiogenesis induced by three-dimensional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold with different interconnection sizes via activation of PI3K/Akt pathways[J]. Sci. Rep., 5: 9409(2015).

[36] NAMKOONG S, LEE S J, KIM C K et al. Prostaglandin E2 stimulates angiogenesis by activating the nitric oxide/cGMP pathway in human umbilical vein endothelial cells[J]. Exp. Mol. Med., 588(2005).

[37] DULAK J, JOZKOWICZ A. Nitric oxide and angiogenic activity of endothelial cells: direct or VEGF-dependent effect[J]. Cardiovasc. Res., 489(2002).

[38] LI J, HUANG H, XU T et al. Effect of the interconnecting window diameter of hydroxyapatite scaffolds on vascularization and osteoinduction[J]. Ceram. Int., 25070(2022).

[39] LU Y J, WANG Z, LU X et al. Minimally invasive treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head in ARCO stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ with bioceramic system[J]. Chin. J. Repar. Reconst. Surgery, 1291(2019).

[40] MURAYAMA A, AJIKI T, HAYASHI Y et al. A unidirectional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate promotes angiogenesis in a vascularized pedicle rat model[J]. J. Orthop. Sci., 1118(2019).

[41] KUNISADA T, HASEI J, FUJIWARA T et al. Radiographic and clinical assessment of unidirectional porous hydroxyapatite to treat benign bone tumors[J]. Sci. Rep., 10: 21578(2020).

[42] KUMAGAI H, MAKIHARA T, FUNAYAMA T et al. Angiogenesis and new bone formation in novel unidirectional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate: a histological study[J]. J. Artif. Organs., 294(2019).

[43] IKUTA K, NISHIDA Y, OTA T et al. A clinical trial of a unidirectional porous tricalcium phosphate filling for defects after resection of benign bone lesions: a prospective multicenter study[J]. Sci. Rep., 12: 16060(2022).

[44] LU Y, LU X, LI M et al. Minimally invasive treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with angioconductive bioceramic rod.[J]. Int. Orthop., 1567(2018).

[45] LU J, DESCAMPS M, DEJOU J et al. The biodegradation mechanism of calcium phosphate biomaterials in bone[J]. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 408(2002).

[46] ZHANG Y, SHU T, WANG S et al. The osteoinductivity of calcium phosphate-based biomaterials: a tight interaction with bone healing[J]. Front Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10: 911180(2022).

[47] STASTNY P, SEDLACEK R, SUCHY T et al. Structure degradation and strength changes of sintered calcium phosphate bone scaffolds with different phase structures during simulated biodegradation in vitro[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng.: C, 100: 544(2019).

[48] CHAI Y C, CARLIER A, BOLANDER J et al. Current views on calcium phosphate osteogenicity and the translation into effective bone regeneration strategies[J]. Acta Biomater., 3876(2012).

[49] SANTOS C P G, PRADO J P S, FERNANDES K R et al. Different species of marine sponges diverge in osteogenic potential when therapeutically applied as natural scaffolds for bone regeneration in rats[J]. J. Funct. Biomater., 112(2023).

[50] AVERIANOV I, STEPANOVA M, SOLOMAKHA O et al. 3D-printed composite scaffolds based on poly(ε-caprolactone) filled with poly(glutamic acid)‐modified cellulose nanocrystals for improved bone tissue regeneration[J]. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B: Appl. Biomater., 2422(2022).

[51] CHENG X, YANG X, LIU C et al. Stabilization of apatite coatings on PPENK surfaces by mechanical interlocking to promote bioactivity and osseointegration in vivo[J]. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf., 697(2023).

[52] KUMAR R, PATTANAYAK I, DASH P A et al. Bioceramics: a review on design concepts toward tailor-made (multi)-functional materials for tissue engineering applications[J]. J. Mater. Sci., 3460(2023).

[53] TAJVAR S, HADJIZADEH A, SAMANDARI S S. Scaffold degradation in bone tissue engineering: an overview[J]. Int. Biodeter. & Biodegr., 105599(2023).

[54] BOHNER M, SANTONI B L G, DOBELIN N. Beta-tricalcium phosphate for bone substitution: synthesis and properties[J]. Acta Biomater., 113: 23(2020).

[55] LU J X, BLARY M C, VAVASSEUR S et al. Relationship between bioceramics sintering and micro-particles-induced cellular damages[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 361(2004).

[56] SHEIKH Z, ABDALLAH M N, HANAFI A A et al. Mechanisms of in vivo degradation and resorption of calcium phosphate based biomaterials[J]. Materials (Basel), 7913(2015).

[57] SIMON J L, ROY T D, PARSONS J R et al. Engineered cellular response to scaffold architecture in a rabbit trephine defect[J]. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 275(2003).

[58] LU J X, GALLUR A, FLAUTRE B et al. Comparative study of tissue reactions to calcium phosphate ceramics among cancellous, cortical, and medullar bone sites in rabbits[J]. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 357(1998).

[59] GALOIS L, MAINARD D, DELAGOUTTE J P. Beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramic as a bone substitute in orthopaedic surgery[J]. Int. Orthop., 109(2002).

[60] WANG Z, LU B, CHEN L et al. Evaluation of an osteostimulative putty in the sheep spine[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 185(2011).

[61] ZHI W, WANG X, SUN D et al. Optimal regenerative repair of large segmental bone defect in a goat model with osteoinductive calcium phosphate bioceramic implants[J]. Bioact. Mater., 11: 240(2022).

[62] HAMPP C, ANGRISANI N, REIFENRATH J et al. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of two magnesium alloys as degradable implant materials in comparison to titanium as non-resorbable material in the rabbit[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 317(2013).

[63] WANG Z, GUO Z, BAI H et al. Clinical evaluation of beta-TCP in the treatment of lacunar bone defects: a prospective, randomized controlled study[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 1894(2013).

[64] DEHOUX E, MADI K, FOURATI E et al. High tibial open-wedge osteotomy using a tricalcium phosphate substitute: 70 cases with 18 months mean follow-up[J]. Rev. Chir. Orthop. Reparatrice. Appar. Mot., 143(2005).

[65] HERNIGOU P, ROUSSIGNOL X, FLOUZAT-LACHANIETTE C H et al. Opening wedge tibial osteotomy for large varus deformity with ceraver resorbable beta-tricalcium phosphate wedges[J]. Int. Orthop., 191(2010).

[66] KRAAL T, MULLENDER M, DE BRUINE J H et al. Resorbability of rigid beta-tricalcium phosphate wedges in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a retrospective radiological study[J]. Knee, 201(2008).

[67] TANAKA T, KUMAGAE Y, SAITO M et al. Bone formation and resorption in patients after implantation of beta-tricalcium phosphate blocks with 60% and 75% porosity in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy[J]. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 453(2008).

[68] OGOSE A, HOTTA T, KAWASHIMA H et al. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate as bone substitutes after excision of bone tumors[J]. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 94(2005).

[69] HIRATA M, MURATA H, TAKESHITA H et al. Use of purified beta-tricalcium phosphate for filling defects after curettage of benign bone tumours[J]. Int. Orthop., 510(2006).

[70] JAVAHERI B, PITSILLIDES A A. Aging and mechanoadaptive responsiveness of bone[J]. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep., 560(2019).

[71] ZHANG Y, ZHANG Q, HE F et al. Fabrication of cancellous- bone-mimicking β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramic scaffolds with tunable architecture and mechanical strength by stereolithography 3D printing[J]. J. Europ. Ceram. Soci., 6713(2022).

[72] ZHANG F, CHANG J, LU J et al. Bioinspired structure of bioceramics for bone regeneration in load-bearing sites[J]. Acta Biomater., 896(2007).

[73] LIN KAILI, WANG XIAOHONG, STEVE G S et al. Research progress on functional modifications and applications of bioceramic scaffolds[J]. J. Inorg. Mater., 867(2020).

[74] MIAO X, SUN D. Graded/gradient porous biomaterials[J]. Materials, 26(2009).

[75] HENDERSON E R, GROUNDLAND J S, PALA E et al. Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review[J]. J. Bone Joint. Surg. Am., 418(2011).

[76] KENDAL J K, HAMAD C D, ABBOTT A G et al. What are the indications and survivorship of tumor endoprosthetic reconstructions for patients with extremity metastatic bone disease[J]. J. Surg. Oncol., 1196(2023).

[77] LU Y, CHEN G, LONG Z et al. Novel 3D-printed prosthetic composite for reconstruction of massive bone defects in lower extremities after malignant tumor resection[J]. J. Bone Oncol., 16: 100220(2019).

[78] KELLY C N, WANG T, CROWLEY J et al. High-strength, porous additively manufactured implants with optimized mechanical osseointegration[J]. Biomaterials, 279: 121206(2021).

[79] HAIJIE L, DASEN L, TAO J et al. Implant survival and complication profiles of endoprostheses for treating tumor around the knee in adults: a systematic review of the literature over the past 30 years[J]. J. Arthroplasty, 1275(2018).

[80] VIJAYAVENKATARAMAN S, GOPINATH A, LU W F. A new design of 3D-printed orthopedic bone plates with auxetic structures to mitigate stress shielding and improve intra-operative bending[J]. Bio-Design Manufact., 98(2020).

[81] POBLOTH A M, CHECA S, RAZI H et al. Mechanobiologically optimized 3D titanium-mesh scaffolds enhance bone regeneration in critical segmental defects in sheep[J]. Sci. Transl. Med., 8828(2018).

[82] WU N, LI S, ZHANG B et al. The advances of topology optimization techniques in orthopedic implants: a review[J]. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 1673(2021).

[83] SAFAVI S, YU Y, ROBINSON D L et al. Additively manufactured controlled porous orthopedic joint replacement designs to reduce bone stress shielding: a systematic review[J]. J. Orthop. Surg. Res., 42(2023).

[84] YUAN J, WANG B, HAN C et al. Nanosized-Ag-doped porous beta-tricalcium phosphate for biological applications[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 114: 111037(2020).

[85] YUAN J, WANG B, HAN C, al. et[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 174(2015).

[86] GUO X M, WANG C Y, DUAN C M et al. Repair of osteochondral defects with autologous chondrocytes seeded onto bioceramic scaffold in sheep[J]. Tissue Eng., 1830(2004).

[87] GUO X M, WANG C Y, ZHANG Y F et al. Repair of large articular cartilage defects with implants of autologous mesenchymal stem cells seeded into beta-tricalcium phosphate in a sheep model[J]. Tissue Eng., 10, 1818(2004).

[88] LI D, LI M, LIU P et al. Tissue-engineered bone constructed in a bioreactor for repairing critical-sized bone defects in sheep[J]. Int. Orthop., 2399(2014).

[89] SPONER P, KUCERA T, BRTKOVA J et al. Comparative study on the application of mesenchymal stromal cells combined with tricalcium phosphate scaffold into femoral bone defects[J]. Cell Transplant., 1459(2018).

[90] FATALE V, PAGNONI S, PAGNONI A E et al. Histomorphometric comparison of new bone formed after maxillary sinus lift with lateral and crestal approaches using periostal mesenchymal stem cells and beta-tricalcium phosphate: a controlled clinical trial[J]. J. Craniofac. Surg., 1607(2022).

[91] CHU W, WANG X, GAN Y et al. Screen-enrich-combine circulating system to prepare MSC/beta-TCP for bone repair in fractures with depressed tibial plateau[J]. Regen. Med., 555(2019).

[92] BLANCO J F, VILLARON E M, PESCADOR D et al. Autologous mesenchymal stromal cells embedded in tricalcium phosphate for posterolateral spinal fusion: results of a prospective phase I/II clinical trial with long-term follow-up[J]. Stem Cell Res. Ther., 63(2019).

[93] LYU J, MA T, HUANG X et al. Core decompression with β-tri-calcium phosphate grafts in combination with platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of avascular necrosis of femoral head[J]. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 40(2023).

[94] GAO Y, CHENG J, LONG Z et al. Repair of segmental ulnar bone defect in juvenile caused by osteomyelitis with induced membrane combined with tissue-engineered bone:a case report with 4-year follow-up[report]. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep.(2022).

[95] GUPTA S, MALHOTRA A, JINDAL R et al. Role of beta tri-calcium phosphate-based composite ceramic as bone-graft expander in masquelet’s-induced membrane technique[J]. Indian J. Orthop., 63(2019).

[96] SASAKI G, WATANABE Y, MIYAMOTO W et al. Induced membrane technique using beta-tricalcium phosphate for reconstruction of femoral and tibial segmental bone loss due to infection: technical tips and preliminary clinical results[J]. Int. Orthop., 17(2018).

[97] RAVEN T F, MOGHADDAM A, ERMISCH C et al. Use of Masquelet technique in treatment of septic and atrophic fracture nonunion[J]. Injury, 40(2019).

[98] JUN F, ZHENG G, HONGBIN F et al. Aplication of 3D-printed prosthesis on construction of long segmental bone defect after tumor resection[J]. Chin. J. Orthop., 433(2017).

[99] HU X, KENAN S, CHENG M et al. 3D-printed patient-customized artificial vertebral body for spinal reconstruction after total En Bloc spondylectomy of complex multi-level spinal tumors[J]. Int. J. Bioprint., 576(2022).

[100] BROWN T S, SALIB C G, ROSE P S et al. Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review[J]. Bone Joint J., 2018.

[101] THOMAS D, SINGH D. 3D-printing for engineering the next generation of artificial trabecular bone structures[J]. Int. J. Surg., 46: 195(2017).

[102] GAO P, ZHANG H, LIU Y et al. Beta-tricalcium phosphate granules improve osteogenesis in vitro and establish innovative osteo-regenerators for bone tissue engineering in vivo[J]. Sci. Rep., 6: 23367(2016).