NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, Volume. 46, Issue 6, 060604(2023)

Friction pressure drop model for wire-wrapped rod bundles in full flow

Taotao ZHOU1,2, Shuyong LIU1、*, and Jie YU1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Nuclear Energy Safety Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
  • 2University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(15)
    Diagram of wire-wrapped rod assembly construction
    The ratio of the number of subchannels to the total number of subchannels
    Relationship between CbT and n (a) Rehme's experimental data, (b) Database data
    Relationship between CbT and P/D (a) Marten's and Rehme's experimental data, (b) Database data
    Relationship between CbT and H/D (a) Rehme's experimental data, (b) Database data
    Relationship between CbL and P/D
    Relationship between CbL and H/D
    Relationship between Fmand Re
    Predicted friction coefficients of the different models vs. the experimental friction coefficients (a) Novendstern model, (b) Rehme model, (c) Engel model, (d) BBDD model, (e) CTS model, (f) CTD mode, (g) UCTD model, (h) This word model
    Predicted friction coefficients of the different models vs. the LBE experimental friction coefficients
    • Table 1. Experimental data

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Experimental data

      作者IDP/DNrH/D年份YearD / mmDw / mmCTCL数据点Points
      Marten13[6]1.0413717.01198215.980.660.159 746.4319
      Chiu1[11]1.067618197712.730.80.240 288.0035
      Chiu2[11]1.067614197712.730.80.471 916041
      Marten21[6]1.072378.34198215.511.120.157 071.0019
      Engel[3]1.082617.698197912.850.940.277 799.4261
      Marten32[6]1.1013712.31198215.111.530.206 675.3119
      LYU1[12]1.1167252020151.640.131 430
      LYU2[13]1.11661252016151.640.167 040
      Rehme11[2]1.12578.331967121.50.182 722
      Rehme21[2]1.125198.331967121.50.299 527
      Rehme22[2]1.1251912.51967121.50.200 029
      Rehme23[2]1.1251916.671967121.50.168 231
      Rehme24[2]1.12519251967121.50.145 230
      Rehme25[2]1.1251933.331967121.50.136 146
      Fan[14]1.1511911.16202012.91.950.219 857
      Cheng[6]1.1543713.4198615.042.260.200 192.8839
      Itoh1[6]1.1761273819815.50.90.161 575.2122
      Grazzini[15]1.189123.9519716.681.20.180 46
      Ohshima1[16]1.181273820175.50.90.157 075.9211
      Vaghetto[17]1.1896130201815.930.143 07549
      Ohshima3[16]1.22712220177.51.40.180 06
      Song[18]1.21923.120202030.178 06
      Choi[19]1.227124.8420037.41.40.185 791
      Ohshima2[16]1.2116947.220176.51.320.156 876.419
      Itoh2[6]1.21416947.419816.51.320.159 776.4417
      Wakasugi1[20]1.2219114.2919716.31.270.224 111
      Wakasugi2[20]1.2219120.6319716.31.270.196 212
      Wakasugi3[20]1.2219130.1619716.31.270.167 811
      Wakasugi4[20]1.2219141.2719716.31.270.162 012
      Rehme12[2]1.23378.331967122.80.286 336
      Spencer[21]1.25221751.7419805.841.420.159 985.7265
      Padmakumar[22]1.25521730.320176.61.650.186 687.7250
      Chun[23]1.25619252001820.188 298.33161
      Rehme13[2]1.27578.331967123.30.356 128
      Rehme16[2]1.275712.51967123.30.252 532
      Rehme17[2]1.2757501967123.30.117 633
      Rehme26[2]1.2751912.51967123.30.285 331
      Rehme27[2]1.27519501967123.30.131 933
      Rehme31[2]1.2753712.51967123.30.311 031
      Rehme32[2]1.27537501967123.30.140 833
      Pacio[24]1.279194020168.22.20.163 551
      Kennedy[25]1.28212740.420196.551.80.163 942
      Hoffmann1[26]1.3176116.67197361.90.263 030
      Hoffmann2[26]1.3176133.33197361.90.170 534
      Hoffmann3[26]1.3176150197361.90.162 234
      Rehme14[2]1.34378.331967124.480.535 731
      Rehme15[2]1.41778.3319671250.832 427
      Rehme41[2]1.417198.3319671250.930 430
      Rehme42[2]1.4171912.519671250.448 429
      Rehme43[2]1.4171916.6719671250.317 431
      Rehme44[2]1.417192519671250.206 132
      Rehme45[2]1.417195019671250.157 931
    • Table 2. The number of components as a function of the number of subchannels

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. The number of components as a function of the number of subchannels

      项目

      Item

      组件数量

      Number of robs

      中心子通道数量

      Number of center subchannels

      边子通道数量

      Number of edge subchannels

      角子通道数量

      Number of corner channels

      基数n

      Cardinality

      3n2+3n+16n26n6
    • Table 3. Modified empirical constants

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Modified empirical constants

      修正常数γ的值The value of γ100302015107543
      平均相对误差Mean relative error / %3.593.262.982.692.081.250.10-0.90-2.33
      均方根Root mean square / %13.2413.912.912.7612.5212.2411.9211.7512.03
    • Table 4. Friction pressure drop model

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Friction pressure drop model

      摩擦压降模型

      Friction pressure drop model

      年份

      Year

      摩擦压降模型推荐范围 Recommended range of friction pressure drop model
      NrP/DH/D雷诺数范围 Range of Re
      Novndstern[1]197219⁓2171.06⁓1.428⁓962 600⁓2×105
      Rehme[2]19737⁓2171.1⁓1.428⁓501 000⁓3×105
      Engel[3]198219⁓611.067⁓1.0827.7⁓8.350⁓1×105
      CTD[6]198619⁓2171⁓1.428⁓5250⁓1×106
      CTS[6]198619⁓2171.025⁓1.428⁓5050⁓1×106
      BBDD[5]200819⁓2171.06⁓1.428⁓9650⁓1×105
      UCTD[8]20187⁓2171⁓1.428⁓5250⁓1×106
      本文This work20227⁓2711.04⁓1.428⁓5450⁓3×105
    • Table 5. Statistical analysis results

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Statistical analysis results

      摩擦压降模型

      Friction pressure drop model

      Novendstern[1]Rehme[2]Engel[3]BBDD[5]CTS[6]CTD[6]UCTD[8]

      本文

      This work

      层流

      Laminar

      平均相对误差

      Mean relative error / %

      -69.73-5.8310.070.64-16.72-28.82-12.001.71

      均方根

      Root mean square / %

      70.5720.3932.931326.8333.9420.369.83

      过渡流

      Transition

      平均相对误差

      Mean relative error / %

      -1.012.0734.64-0.041.40-4.52-6.71-0.9

      均方根

      Root mean square / %

      23.7518.3750.9612.9915.5715.5519.3211.75

      湍流

      Turbulence

      平均相对误差

      Mean relative error / %

      13.411.2435.2912.9811.2511.700.570.50

      均方根

      Root mean square / %

      24.3814.9957.3022.6820.3625.2218.267.73

      总计

      Total

      平均相对误差

      Mean relative error / %

      (6.09)(1.66)34.058.964.761.4-3.62-0.28

      均方根

      Root mean square / %

      (24.06)(16.79)54.8320.1718.8222.0418.899.89
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Taotao ZHOU, Shuyong LIU, Jie YU. Friction pressure drop model for wire-wrapped rod bundles in full flow[J]. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, 2023, 46(6): 060604

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Articles

    Received: Sep. 7, 2022

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Jul. 5, 2023

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.060604

    Topics