Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 38, Issue 8, 0815006(2018)
Performance Comparison of Three Basic Phase Unwrapping Algorithms and Their Hybrid Algorithms
Fig. 3. Definition of (a) reliability of pixel points, (b) reliability of edges, and (c)~(e) process of phase unwrapping of FPU algorithm
Fig. 4. Simulation of (a) continuous phase and (b) its corresponding wrapped phase
Fig. 5. Unwrapped results of six noises by using three algorithms. The noises are (a) A, (b) 1.33A, (c) 1.67A, (d) 2A, (e) 2.33A, (f) 2.67A, respectively
Fig. 6. Changing of (a) error and (b) time consuming that using three algorithms to unwrap six kinds of wrapped phases with noise
Fig. 7. Simulation of (a) continuous phase and its (b)~(c) corresponding wrapped phase with noise
Fig. 8. Phase unwrapped results (first row) and their errors (second row) using (a) BC, (b) MD, (c) FPU, (d) BC-MD, and (e) FPU-MD algorithms, respectively
Fig. 9. (a) Deformed fringes and (b) wrapped phase of a Buddha sculpture; (c) deformed fringes and (d) wrapped phase of a face mask
Fig. 10. Unwrapped results of the wrapped phase of Buddha sculpture using (a) BC, (b) MD and (c) BC-MD algorithms, respectively
Fig. 11. Unwrapped results of the wrapped phase of face mask using (a) FPU, (b) MD and (c) FPU-MD algorithms, respectively
|
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Yu Han, Qican Zhang, Yingshan Wu. Performance Comparison of Three Basic Phase Unwrapping Algorithms and Their Hybrid Algorithms[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(8): 0815006
Category: Machine Vision
Received: Jan. 25, 2018
Accepted: Mar. 19, 2018
Published Online: Sep. 6, 2018
The Author Email: