Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 51, Issue 17, 1709001(2024)

Cruciate Block Compression Foveated JND Model for Near‑Eye Display

Yanrui Sun1 and Yuan Ji1,2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Microelectronics Research and Development Center, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China
  • 2School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(20)
    Luminance masking test image
    Contrast masking test image
    Results of visual experiment. (a) JND-luminance; (b) JND-eccentricity; (c) JND-contrast; (d) JND-block size
    Relationship among JND and different parameters. (a) Relationship among JND, luminance and eccentricity; (b) relationship among JND, luminance and contrast; (c) relationship among JND, block size and eccentricity
    CB-FJND model noise injection. (a) Original image; (b) noise injection with 3 pixel×3 pixel block; (c) noise injection with 5 pixel×5 pixel block; (d) noise injection with 7 pixel×7 pixel block; (e) result of Ref. [7] model; (f) results of Ref. [9] model
    Lena bit-plane images. (a) 23 bit-planes; (b) 25 bit-planes
    Distribution of bit16 before and after modification of
    Comparison of compression effect and partially enlarged image. (a) Algorithm in Ref. [10]; (b) cruciate block compression algorithm (19 subfields); (c) cruciate block compression algorithm (25 subfields)
    Hardware implementation system block diagram
    Picture of FPGA test platform
    Image compression effect and detail enlargement comparison of Lena. (a) Algorithm in Ref. [10]; (b) our algorithm (19 subfields); (c) our algorithm (25 subfields)
    • Table 1. Luminance/contrast masking test variable control

      View table

      Table 1. Luminance/contrast masking test variable control

      AttributeLuminance masking testContrast masking test
      Eccentricity /(°)1,2,3,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,501,2,3,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50
      Luminance0,10,20,40,60,80,100,125,150,180,200,220,24060,100,150,180,220
      Contrast00,20,40,60,80
    • Table 2. Block masking test variable control

      View table

      Table 2. Block masking test variable control

      AttributeValue
      Block size /pixel2,3,5,7,10
      Luminance0,10,20,40,60,80,100,125,150,180,200,220,240
      Eccentricity /(°)1,2,3,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50
    • Table 3. Comparison of bit16 before and after threshold modification

      View table

      Table 3. Comparison of bit16 before and after threshold modification

      StageMaximum run lengthAverage rate of variability /%
      Before modification4937.86
      After modification6129.88
    • Table 4. 19‒25 bit-plane weights

      View table

      Table 4. 19‒25 bit-plane weights

      Subfield numberWeight distribution
      1916{15} 8 4 2 1
      2016{15} 8 4 1{3}
      2116{15} 8 2{2} 1{3}
      2216{15} 8 2 1{5}
      2316{15} 8 1{7}
      2416{15} 4{2} 1{7}
      2516{15} 4 2{2} 1{7}
    • Table 5. Fractional subfield weight division strategy

      View table

      Table 5. Fractional subfield weight division strategy

      Subfield numberFractional subfield weights
      208∶4∶1∶1∶1
      8∶2∶2∶2∶1
      4∶4∶4∶2∶1
      218∶2∶2∶1∶1∶1
      4∶4∶4∶1∶1∶1
      4∶4∶2∶2∶2∶1
      228∶2∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1
      4∶4∶2∶2∶1∶1∶1
      4∶2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶1
      238∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1
      4∶4∶2∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1
      4∶2∶2∶2∶2∶1∶1∶1
      2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶1
      244∶4∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1
      4∶2∶2∶2∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1
      2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶1∶1∶1
      254∶2∶2∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1
      2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1
    • Table 6. Image quality after compression with different weight distribution bit-planes

      View table

      Table 6. Image quality after compression with different weight distribution bit-planes

      Subfield numberFractional subfield weightsPSNR /dBSSIM
      LenaPeppersBaboonLenaPeppersBaboon
      208∶4∶1∶1∶143.242242.788641.87020.99880.99870.9968
      8∶2∶2∶2∶141.147440.494538.94260.99790.99800.9959
      4∶4∶4∶2∶138.068437.690737.70890.99590.99640.9922
      218∶2∶2∶1∶1∶141.147440.494538.94260.99790.99800.9959
      4∶4∶4∶1∶1∶138.229937.905637.70890.99610.99660.9922
      4∶4∶2∶2∶2∶138.113137.703737.70890.99590.99650.9922
      228∶2∶1∶1∶1∶1∶140.512939.921738.94260.99770.99760.9959
      4∶4∶2∶2∶1∶1∶138.113137.703737.70890.99590.99650.9922
      4∶2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶135.480236.217434.98040.99200.99490.9907
      238∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1∶138.795338.346237.74450.99670.99620.9953
      4∶4∶2∶1∶1∶1∶1∶137.802537.680637.70890.99560.99650.9922
      4∶2∶2∶2∶2∶1∶1∶135.480236.217434.98040.99200.99490.9907
      2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶132.472932.711034.32320.98340.99090.9864
      244∶4∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1∶137.746937.849837.70890.99550.99660.9922
      4∶2∶2∶2∶1∶1∶1∶1∶135.480236.217434.98040.99200.99490.9907
      2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶1∶1∶132.472932.711034.32320.98340.99090.9864
      254∶2∶2∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1∶1∶135.480236.217434.98040.99200.99490.9907
      2∶2∶2∶2∶2∶1∶1∶1∶1∶132.472932.711034.32320.98340.99090.9864
      JPEG quality 10037.487432.803629.29410.99460.98860.9511
      JPEG quality 9034.766031.329627.94590.99020.98260.9333
      JPEG quality 8033.606130.542026.65530.98750.97890.9143
    • Table 7. Bit compression rate of compressed image

      View table

      Table 7. Bit compression rate of compressed image

      ImageRef. [10Ref. [11CB-FJND with different subfield numbers
      19202122232425
      Lena36.0053.4736.5732.9631.5130.2628.7127.8226.10
      Peppers40.2056.2240.1836.4234.8133.3931.7430.9429.10
      Baboon51.0363.6850.4347.6745.0643.1541.3139.9136.84
      Average42.4157.7942.3939.0237.1335.633.9232.8930.68
    • Table 8. PSNR of compressed image

      View table

      Table 8. PSNR of compressed image

      ImageRef. [10Ref. [11CB-FJND with different subfield numbers
      19202122232425
      Lena38.9237.7343.6343.2441.1540.5238.8037.7535.48
      Peppers39.8538.1643.4442.7940.5039.9238.3537.8536.21
      Baboon37.4436.9142.8141.8738.9538.9537.7537.7134.98
      Average38.7337.6043.2942.6340.2039.8038.3037.7735.56
    • Table 9. SSIM of compressed image

      View table

      Table 9. SSIM of compressed image

      ImageRef. [10Ref. [11CB-FJND with different subfield numbers
      19202122232425
      Lena0.99740.98130.99890.99880.99790.99770.99670.99550.9920
      Peppers0.99730.98070.99880.99870.99800.99760.99620.99660.9949
      Baboon0.99550.97920.99750.99680.99590.99590.99530.99220.9907
      Average0.99670.98040.99840.99810.99730.99710.99610.99480.9925
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yanrui Sun, Yuan Ji. Cruciate Block Compression Foveated JND Model for Near‑Eye Display[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(17): 1709001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: holography and information processing

    Received: Dec. 19, 2023

    Accepted: Feb. 6, 2024

    Published Online: Aug. 29, 2024

    The Author Email: Ji Yuan (jiyuan@shu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL231552

    CSTR:32183.14.CJL231552

    Topics