Journals Articles Conferences News About CLP
Submit a paper Email Alert
Search
Search
Articles
Journals
News
Advanced Search
Top Searches
2D MaterialsTransformation opticsQuantum PhotonicsSmall lasersSemiconductor UV PhotonicsSupersymmetric microring laser arrays

Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 46, Issue 9, 910001(2019)

Influence of Surface Reflectance and Aerosol Optical Depth on Performance of Spaceborne Integral Path Differential Absorption Lidar

Yang Juxin1, Zhu Yadan2, Wang Qin1, Bu Lingbing1、*, Liu Jiqiao2, and Chen Weibiao2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol and Cloud Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210044, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Space Laser Communication and Detection Technology, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
    • show less
    AbstractGet PDF(in Chinese)
    Figures&Tables (7)
    Equations (0)
    References (34)
    Cited By (4)
    Tools
    Paper Information
    Topics
    Figures & Tables(7)
    Global seasonal average and annual average surface reflectance of 1572 nm. (a) Average surface reflectance of 1572 nm in spring; (b) average surface reflectance of 1572 nm in summer; (c) average surface reflectance of 1572 nm in autumn; (d) average surface reflectance of 1572 nm in winter; (e) annual average surface reflectance of 1572 nm

    Fig. 1. Global seasonal average and annual average surface reflectance of 1572 nm. (a) Average surface reflectance of 1572 nm in spring; (b) average surface reflectance of 1572 nm in summer; (c) average surface reflectance of 1572 nm in autumn; (d) average surface reflectance of 1572 nm in winter; (e) annual average surface reflectance of 1572 nm

    Download full size
    Global seasonal average and annual average AOD of 1572 nm. (a) Average AOD of 1572 nm in spring; (b) average AOD of 1572 nm in summer; (c) average AOD of 1572 nm in autumn; (d) average AOD of 1572 nm in winter; (e) annual average AOD of 1572 nm

    Fig. 2. Global seasonal average and annual average AOD of 1572 nm. (a) Average AOD of 1572 nm in spring; (b) average AOD of 1572 nm in summer; (c) average AOD of 1572 nm in autumn; (d) average AOD of 1572 nm in winter; (e) annual average AOD of 1572 nm

    Download full size
    Global distributions of on-line and off-line echo power. (a) On-line single-pulse echo power; (b) off-line single-pulse echo power

    Fig. 3. Global distributions of on-line and off-line echo power. (a) On-line single-pulse echo power; (b) off-line single-pulse echo power

    Download full size
    Global distributions of lidar signal-to-noise ratio. (a) On-line output signal-to-noise ratio; (b) off-line output signal-to-noise ratio

    Fig. 4. Global distributions of lidar signal-to-noise ratio. (a) On-line output signal-to-noise ratio; (b) off-line output signal-to-noise ratio

    Download full size
    Global distribution of relative random error

    Fig. 5. Global distribution of relative random error

    Download full size

    • Table 1. Parameters used in simulation

      View table

      Table 1. Parameters used in simulation

      ParameterValue
      On-line wavenumber /cm-16361.225
      Off-line wavenumber /cm-16360.979
      Laser pulse energy /mJ75
      Pulse length /ns15
      Laser divergence angle /mrad0.1
      Telescope diameter /m1
      System optical efficiency /%69
      Height of satellite platform /km700
      Laser pulse repetition frequency /Hz20
      Pulse accumulative times148(land)/296(ocean)
      Quantum efficiency0.75
      Electronic bandwidth of APD /MHz2
      Internal gain factor of APD10
      Dark current of APD /nA8
      Excess noise factor (F)5.5
      Bandwidth /MHz5
      Topographic variation height difference /m3

    • Table 2. Variation range of main parameters in different seasons

      View table

      Table 2. Variation range of main parameters in different seasons

      ParameterSpringSummerAutumnWinterAnnual average
      MinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMax
      Pon /nW0.29979.60.37080.60.80072.70.81473.40.75470.7
      Poff /nW1.193171.493213.192903.242923282
      RSN(int)on /dB26.0139.8826.8639.9129.6039.6929.6639.7129.2639.60
      RSN(int)off /dB30.9142.9131.6142.9333.8142.7133.8642.7333.2342.65
      ERRE7.5×10-52.2×10-37.2×10-51.7×10-37.8×10-59.5×10-47.8×10-59.4×10-48.0×10-51.0×10-3
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yang Juxin, Zhu Yadan, Wang Qin, Bu Lingbing, Liu Jiqiao, Chen Weibiao. Influence of Surface Reflectance and Aerosol Optical Depth on Performance of Spaceborne Integral Path Differential Absorption Lidar[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2019, 46(9): 910001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Set citation alerts for article
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: remote sensing and sensor

    Received: Mar. 14, 2019

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Sep. 10, 2019

    The Author Email: Lingbing Bu (lingbingbu@nuist.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL201946.0910001

    Topics

    laser devices and laser physics
    Lasers and Laser Optics
    Laser physics
    laser manufacturing
    Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology