[1] CHANG C C, LEE Y H, LIN C J et al. Visual assessment of camouflaged targets with different background similarities[J]. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 114, 527-541(2012).

[2] LIN C J, CHANG C C, LEE Y H. Developing a similarity index for static camouflaged target detection[J]. The Imaging Science Journal, 62, 337-341(2013).

[3] LIN C J, CHANG C C, LIU B S. Developing and evaluating a target-background similarity metric for camouflage detection[J]. PLoS One, 9, e87310(2014).

[4] YANG X, XU W D, JIA Q et al. MF-CFI: a fused evaluation index for camouflage patterns based on human visual perception[J]. Defence Technology, 17, 1602-1608(2021).

[5] YU Jun, LIU Haoyang, ZHANG Yunhui et al. An evaluation method of optical camouflage effect based on contour deformation degree[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 50, 0610001(2021).

[6] STEVENS M, MERILAITA S. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 423-427(2009).

[7] LOVELL P G, RUXTON G D, LANGRIDGE K V et al. Egg-laying substrate selection for optimal camouflage by quail[J]. Curr Biol, 23, 260-264(2013).

[8] KANG C, STEVENS M, MOON J Y et al. Camouflage through behavior in moths: the role of background matching and disruptive coloration[J]. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 45-54(2015).

[9] TROSCIANKO J, SKELHORN J, STEVENS M. Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance[J]. BMC Evol Biol, 17, 7(2017).

[10] FRASER S, CALLAHAN A, KLASSEN D et al. Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability[J]. Proceedings of the Royal SocietyB:BiologicalSciences, 274, 1325-1331(2007).

[11] SCHAEFER H M, STOBBE N. Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching[J]. Proceedings of the Royal SocietyB:BiologicalSciences, 273, 2427-2432(2006).

[12] HANLON R T, CHIAO C C, MATHGER L M et al. Cephalopod dynamic camouflage: bridging the continuum between background matching and disruptive coloration[J]. Philosophical transactions-Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 364, 429-437(2009).

[13] CUTHILL I C. Camouflage[J]. Journal of Zoology, 308, 75-92(2019).

[14] PRICE N, GREEN S, TROSCIANKO J et al. Background matching and disruptive coloration as habitat-specific strategies for camouflage[J]. Scientific Reports, 9, 7840(2019).

[15] TORRALBA A, OLIVA A, CASTELHANO M S et al. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search[J]. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786(2006).

[16] CHHABRA A, JENSEN R V. Direct determination of the f (α) singularity spectrum[J]. Physical Review Letters, 62, 1327(1989).

[17] BAI X, LIAO N, WU W. Assessment of camouflage effectiveness based on perceived color difference and gradient magnitude[J]. Sensors (Basel), 20, 4672(2020).

[18] XUE W, ZHANG L, MOU X et al. Gradient magnitude similarity deviation: a highly efficient perceptual image quality index[J]. IEEE Trans Image Process, 23, 684-695(2014).

[19] HSU T H, LIN L Z. QFD with fuzzy and entropy weight for evaluating retail customer values[J]. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17, 935-958(2006).

[20] ROSENHOLTZ R, LI Y, JIN Z et al. Feature congestion: a measure of visual clutter[J]. Journal of Vision, 6, 827-827(2006).

[21] TOET A. Image dataset for testing search and detection models[J]. Optical Engineering, 40, 1760-1767(2001).

[22] CULPEPPER J B. Texture metric that predicts target detection performance[J]. Optical Engineering, 54, 123101(2015).

[23] TOET A. Computational versus psychophysical bottom-up image saliency: a comparative evaluation study[J]. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 33, 2131-2146(2011).

[24] TOET A, HOGERVORST M A. Review of camouflage assessment techniques[C], 1153604(2020).

[25] ZHAO Y, SONG Y, SULAMAN M et al. An image clutter metric based on multidirectional difference hash[C](2020).

[26] WILSON D L. Image-based contrast-to-clutter modeling of detection[J]. Optical Engineering, 40, 1852-1857(2001).