Infrared and Laser Engineering, Volume. 50, Issue 11, 20210060(2021)
Research on infrared anti-jamming evaluation method based on principal component-analytic hierarchy process
Figures & Tables(16)
Fig. 1. Infrared anti-interference comprehensive evaluation index system
Fig. 4. Comparison of miss distance and evaluation score before correction
Table 1. Quantitative scale
View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Quantitative scale
Comparison f and g afg agf f is as important as g 1 1 f is slightly more important than g 3 1/3 f is more important than g 5 1/5 f is obviously more important than g 7 1/7 f is absolutely more important than g 9 1/9 Adjacent judgment median 2,4,6,8 1/2,1/4,1/6,1/8
Table 2. Mean random consistency index
View tableView in ArticleTable 2. Mean random consistency index
Order (n) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 RI 0 0 0.52 0.89 1.12 1.26 1.36 1.41 1.46 1.49 1.52 1.54 1.56 1.58
Table 3. Index data
View tableView in ArticleTable 3. Index data
No. D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 D10 D11 D12 D13 D14 D15 E1 E2 E3 1 10 0.965 27.3 2 4.9 15 14 0.3 0.05 0.774 0.075 0.001 0.92 0.18 1 4 10 0.9 2 7 0.987 27.2 2 5.7 16 13 0.2 0.04 0.595 0.016 0.0035 0.95 0.16 0.97 7 30 0.89 3 9 0.967 26.9 2 3.7 15 14 0.3 0.03 0.676 0.044 0.0022 0.91 0.21 0.82 6 60 0.93 4 8 0.975 26.8 2 4.3 15 15 0.4 0.05 0.88 0.059 0.0008 0.9 0.18 0.55 5 40 0.91 5 11 0.99 27.1 4 2.3 17 15 0.2 0.03 0.231 0.056 0.0028 0.93 0.19 0.73 4 90 0.88 6 6 0.985 27 4 2.8 20 14 0.3 0.04 0.702 0.05 0.0014 0.95 0.31 0.64 3 120 0.94 7 9 0.973 27.3 4 1.5 20 12 0.4 0.05 0.336 0.035 0.0045 0.93 0.84 0.46 8 150 0.87 8 12 0.983 26.9 2 3.3 19 13 0.3 0.03 0.498 0.026 0.0024 0.91 0.17 0.39 6 160 0.92 9 7 0.98 26.7 3 5.4 17 13 0.3 0.04 0.159 0.024 0.0032 0.92 0.2 0.84 5 70 0.93 10 8 0.95 27.2 4 4.7 15 14 0.2 0.05 0.967 0.047 0.0038 0.93 0.22 0.78 7 110 0.9
Table 4. Average influence degree between indexes
View tableView in ArticleTable 4. Average influence degree between indexes
Index D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 D10 D11 D12 D13 D14 D15 E1 E2 E3 Ri 3.248 3.564 4.019 4.350 5.804 5.847 4.809 3.676 3.829 4.558 5.307 4.955 3.909 6.039 5.009 3.914 5.605 3.893
Table 5. A-B discriminant matrix and weight
View tableView in ArticleTable 5. A-B discriminant matrix and weight
RA B1 B2 B3 WB B1 1 1/7 2 0.131 B2 7 1 9 0.793 B3 1/2 1/9 1 0.076
Table 6. B1, B2-C discriminant matrix and weight
View tableView in ArticleTable 6. B1, B2-C discriminant matrix and weight
RB1 C1 C2 WC1 RB2 C3 C4 WC2 C1 1 2 0.667 C3 1 5 0.833 C2 1/2 1 0.333 C4 1/5 1 0.167
Table 7. D-C1 discriminant matrix and weight
View tableView in ArticleTable 7. D-C1 discriminant matrix and weight
RC1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 WD1-6 D1 1 1/2 1/3 1/4 1/5 1/5 0.046 D2 2 1 1/2 1/3 1/4 1/4 0.070 D3 3 2 1 1/2 1/3 1/3 0.112 D4 4 3 2 1 1/2 1/2 0.180 D5 5 4 3 2 1 1 0.296 D6 5 4 3 2 1 1 0.296
Table 8. D-C2 discriminant matrix and weight
View tableView in ArticleTable 8. D-C2 discriminant matrix and weight
RC2 D7 D8 D9 WD7-9 D7 1 3 2 0.540 D8 1/3 1 1/2 0.163 D9 1/2 2 1 0.297
Table 9. D-C3 discriminant matrix and weight
View tableView in ArticleTable 9. D-C3 discriminant matrix and weight
RC3 D10 D11 D12 D13 WD10-13 D10 1 1/4 1/2 2 0.135 D11 4 1 2 7 0.524 D12 2 1/2 1 4 0.271 D13 1/2 1/7 1/4 1 0.070
Table 10. D-C4 discriminant matrix and weight
View tableView in ArticleTable 10. D-C4 discriminant matrix and weight
RC4 D14 D15 WD14-15 D14 1 3 0.75 D15 1/3 1 0.25
Table 11. E-B3 discriminant matrix and weight
View tableView in ArticleTable 11. E-B3 discriminant matrix and weight
RB3 E1 E2 E3 WE1-3 E1 1 1/3 1 0.2 E2 3 1 3 0.6 E3 1 1/3 1 0.2
Table 12. Infrared anti-jamming data and evaluation results
View tableView in ArticleTable 12. Infrared anti-jamming data and evaluation results
Group Ns Ne Nf Tl/s Ti/s Te/s Vf/m·s-1 ${\theta _l}$ ${\theta _v}$ ${\theta _m}$ Dr/km acc/m·s-2 thro/(°) Ma pitch/(°) yaw/(°) roll/(°) MD E Rank 1 12 1 4 0.5 0.1 0.2 10 0 −90 10 4 0 2.001 0.860 1.453 0 0 2.017 1.804 1 2 24 1 6 0.5 0.4 0.8 10 60 −90 130 6 0 2.001 0.860 1.453 0 0 13.713 0.710 10 3 36 1 4 0.5 0.1 0.4 20 60 −90 70 8 0 2.001 0.860 1.453 0 0 187.404 0.641 13 4 12 2 6 2 0.4 0.8 40 150 90 30 5 15.526 2.019 0.724 2.236 −55.147 15.557 4.560 1.698 2 5 48 2 4 2.5 0.1 0.6 40 30 −60 90 4 15.526 2.019 0.724 2.236 −55.147 15.557 13.546 0.721 9 6 24 2 12 2 0.1 0.8 40 150 90 90 8 15.526 2.019 0.724 2.236 −55.147 15.557 450.930 0.361 15 7 12 1 6 0.5 0.1 0.8 30 60 −90 70 8 −24.523 2.044 0.939 1.141 77.102 −24.551 5.321 1.472 3 8 36 1 4 0.5 0.4 0.8 10 60 −90 10 6 −24.523 2.044 0.939 1.141 77.102 −24.551 12.705 0.798 8 9 24 1 12 1 0.1 0.2 20 120 −90 130 10 −24.523 2.044 0.939 1.141 77.102 −24.551 370.244 0.391 14 10 48 2 4 1.5 0.1 0.8 10 0 60 140 7 −37.325 2.677 0.970 14.495 0.909 −37.308 11.973 0.961 7 11 48 2 12 1.5 0.4 0.6 10 0 60 80 8 −37.325 2.677 0.970 14.495 0.909 −37.308 169.682 0.659 12 12 12 2 4 1.5 0.1 0.2 20 0 60 20 6 −37.325 2.677 0.970 14.495 0.909 −37.308 7.475 1.280 5 13 12 3 12 4 0.3 0.6 30 120 90 40 5 14.294 1.711 1.187 −10.307 −0.005 14.308 6.508 1.342 4 14 36 3 6 4 0.5 1 30 120 90 160 9 14.294 1.711 1.187 −10.307 −0.005 14.308 9.277 1.213 6 15 48 3 6 4 0.5 1 30 120 90 100 8 14.294 1.711 1.187 −10.307 −0.005 14.308 14.220 0.697 11
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Xin Wu, Youli Wu, Deqing Niu, Tongxin Liu, Yuxuan Cai, Rui Xu. Research on infrared anti-jamming evaluation method based on principal component-analytic hierarchy process[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2021, 50(11): 20210060
Paper Information
Category: Infrared technology and application
Received: Jan. 15, 2021
Accepted: --
Published Online: Dec. 7, 2021
The Author Email:
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20