Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 58, Issue 24, 2410005(2021)

Focus Measure Operator Combining Cosine Transform and Laplacian Operator

Xiufeng Wang, Xiaowei Sun*, Jiake Wang, Xu Gao, and Hang Yang
Author Affiliations
  • College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun, Jilin 130022, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Focus evaluation curve
    Implementation block diagram of focus evaluation method
    Figures of object model. (a) Bar; (b) Trapezoid; (c) Circle
    Object scanning imaging model
    Simulated defocused sequence images. (a) Bar; (b) Trapezoid; (c) Circle
    Simulated focus evaluation curves. (a) A (136, 92); (b) B (61, 61); (c) C(126, 48)
    Figures of experimental device. (a) Target scanning experiment device figure with lens of f=8 mm; (b) sensor scanning experiment device figure with lens of f=8 mm; (c) sensor scanning experiment device figure with microscope lens of NA=0.65
    Partial defocused images. (a) Defocused image obtained by moving the target under the imaging lens; (b) defocused image obtained by moving the sensor under the imaging lens; (c) defocus image obtained by moving the sensor under the microscope lens; (d) defocused images obtained through lens zoom
    Focus evaluation curves of experimental defocused image. (a) A(222,333); (b) B(380,310); (c) C(290,240); (d) D (180,90)
    • Table 1. Parameter definitions and description

      View table

      Table 1. Parameter definitions and description

      SymbolDescriptionFormula
      λWavelength
      NANumerical aperture
      kWave numberk=2π/λ
      fcSystem cut-off frequencyfc=2NA/λ
      qRadial spatial frequencyq=u2+v2,u,v∈[-fc,fc]
      jinc(x)jinc(x)=2J1(x)/x
      ββ=arccos(q/fc)
      zDefocus distance of the object plane
    • Table 2. Calculation results of simulated defocus image

      View table

      Table 2. Calculation results of simulated defocus image

      MethodSeSp
      ABCMean valueABCMean value
      GEN0.0050.0610.0380.0351.511.861.901.76
      GLV0.0470.0550.0320.0440.661.851.781.43
      SWAV0.0040.0320.0250.0201.421.661.671.58
      SML0.0030.0170.0610.0271.511.681.541.57
      DCT0.0090.0310.1190.0531.901.801.841.85
      Proposed method0.0860.1480.2450.1592.632.273.112.67
    • Table 3. Device parameters used in the experiment

      View table

      Table 3. Device parameters used in the experiment

      DeviceParameter
      SensorCompany / NameVieworks / VH-310C
      Pixel size7.4 μm×7.4 μm
      Active image size640×480
      Bit12 bit, (0--4096)
      LensCompanyComputar
      Focal length2.4--16 mm
      F-number2.4
      MicroscopeNumerical aperture0.65
      Magnification40
      Linear stageCompany / NamePI / M-403.8DG
      Resolution0.5 μm
      Travel range200 mm
    • Table 4. Calculation results of experimental defocus image

      View table

      Table 4. Calculation results of experimental defocus image

      MethodSeSp
      ABCMean valueABCMean value
      GEN0.1900.0520.1180.7031.3490.1650.1851.180
      GLV0.0760.0150.6551.1940.0730.746
      SWAV0.1060.2090.0910.5571.2280.1220.1610.355
      SML0.0960.1160.2500.3751.1810.1560.1450.317
      DCT0.2080.0120.4000.7561.3920.2870.2751.223
      Proposed method0.3030.7340.8390.9731.8161.3131.9651.993
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xiufeng Wang, Xiaowei Sun, Jiake Wang, Xu Gao, Hang Yang. Focus Measure Operator Combining Cosine Transform and Laplacian Operator[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(24): 2410005

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Image Processing

    Received: Dec. 28, 2020

    Accepted: Mar. 8, 2021

    Published Online: Nov. 24, 2021

    The Author Email: Sun Xiaowei (sxwlux@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP202158.2410005

    Topics