Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, Volume. 46, Issue 1, 160(2025)
Review of Atmospheric Methane Detection and Inversion Techniques Based on Space Remote Sensing Satellites
[4] [4] LAN X, THONING K W, DLUGOKENCKY E J. Trends in GloballyAveraged CH4, N2O, SF6[EBOL]. 2022[20230610]. https:doi.g10.15138P8XGAA10. DOI: 10.15138P8XGAA10.
[5] [5] TOLLEFSON J. Scientists Raise Alarm Over ''Dangerously Fast'' Growth in Atmospheric Methane[JOL]. Nature(20220208)[20230610]. https:www.nature.comarticlesd41586022003122. DOI: 10.1038d41586022003122.
[6] [6] NOAA. Increase in Atmospheric Methane Set Another Recd During 2021[EBOL]. (20220407) [20230712]. https:www.noaa.govnewsreleaseincreaseinatmosphericmethanesetanotherrecdduring2021.
[7] [7] MYHRE G, SHINDELL D, BRÉON F M, et al. Anthropogenic Natural Radiative Fcing[R]IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Wking Group I to the 5th Assessment Rept of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013: 659740.
[10] [10] KUYLENSTIERNA J C, MICHALOPOULOU E, MALLEY C. Global Methane Assessment: Benefits Costs of Mitigating Methane Emissions[EBOL]. [20230306]. https:www.sei.gpublicationsglobalmethaneassessment.
[17] [17] CAI Z N, CHE K, LIU Y, et al. 2021. Decreased Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions During the COVID19 Pemic Estimated From FTS MAXDOAS Measurements at Urban Beijing[J]. Remote Sensing, 13(3): 517. DOI: 10.3390rs13030517.
[21] [21] GIOVANELLI G, KOSTADINOV I, PALAZZI E, et al. Differential Optical Absption Spectroscopy(DOAS)[EBOL]. [20231013]. https:johnplane.leeds.ac.ukresearchloweratmospheredoas.
[22] [22] PLATT U. Differential Optical Absption Spectroscopy (DOAS), in Air Moniting by Spectroscopic Techniques[M]MEYERS R A. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry: Applications, They Instrumentation. New Yk: Wiley. 1994: 6070.
[23] FRANKENBERG C, PLATT U, WAGNER T. Iterative Maximum a Posteriori (IMAP)-DOAS for Retrieval of Strongly Absorbing Trace Gases: Model Studies for CH4 and CO2 Retrieval From Near Infrared Spectra of SCIAMACHY Onboard ENVISAT[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Copernicus GmbH, 5, 9-22(2005).
[28] [28] BERK A, CONFTI P, KENT R, et al. MODTRAN6: a Maj Upgrade of the MODTRAN Radiative Transfer Code[C]Proceedings Volume 9088, Algithms Technologies f Multispectral, Hyperspectral, Ultraspectral Imagery XX. Baltime, MD, United States: SPIE, 2014: 14. DOI: 10.111712.2050433.
[32] [32] ERSON G P, CLOUGH S, KNEIZYS F K, et al. AFGL Atmospheric Constituent Profiles (0.120 km)[EBOL]. 1986[20231013]. DOI: 10.48550arXiv.2211.15429.
[33] [33] Kumar S, Tres C, Ulutan O, et al. Deep Remote Sensing Methods f Methane Detection in Overhead Hyperspectral Imagery[C]Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). Aspen, CO: IEEE, 2020: 17651774. l
[34] [34] GROSHENRY A, GIRON C, LAUVAUX T, et al. Detecting Methane Plumes Using PRISMA: Deep Learning Model Data Augmentation[EBOL]. arXiv(20221117) [20231115]. https:arxiv.gabs2211.15429. DOI: 10.48550arXiv.2211.15429.
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Xiaoli CAI, Yunfei BAO, Qiaolin HUANG. Review of Atmospheric Methane Detection and Inversion Techniques Based on Space Remote Sensing Satellites[J]. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, 2025, 46(1): 160
Category:
Received: Jun. 21, 2024
Accepted: --
Published Online: Apr. 2, 2025
The Author Email: