Fig. 1. Fragment folding angle distributions for ¹⁶O+²³²Th at 78 MeV (a) and 86 MeV (b)^[2]solid curves denote the Gaussian fitting results

Fig. 2. Mass widths of the fission fragments of ⁴⁸Ti interacting with different targets at various energies^[11]

Fig. 3. RE as a function of E_c.m./V_B for S+Zr (a) and Ca+Zr (b) systems^[14]

Fig. 4. Comparison of the cross section of ²³⁹Pu(n, 2n) deduced from the surrogate method with other data^[15]

Fig. 5. β₄ extracted from quasi-elastic scattering at backward angles and compared with the results from other experimental approaches as well as the theoretical prediction (Moller95)^[16]: three schematic forms corresponding to β₄ = -0.1, 0, and 0.1 with β₂ = 0.3 are illustrated

Fig. 6. RMS radii of valence protons varying with the separation energies for a number of states in light proton-rich nuclei: the solid circles, squares, and triangles represent the results of the l = 0, 1, and 2 states, respectively^[19]

Fig. 7. Relative momentum (a) and opening angle (b) of two protons of ²⁹S for the excited states at 9.6~10.4 MeV^[20]: the curves denote the simulation results with different two-proton decay modes

Fig. 8. βp energy spectra (a) and decay scheme (b) of ²²Si^[26]

Fig. 9. βdelayedproton decay energy spectra (a) and decay scheme (b) of ²⁶P^[28]

Fig. 10. Energy dependence of the real (a) and imaginary (b) potentials at a sensitivity radius of 13.5 fm for the ⁶He+²⁰⁹Bi system: the solid curve in (b) shows the linear segment fitting for the imaginary potential, and the prediction of the dispersion relation according to the variation of the imaginary potential is represented in (a) by the solid curve^[34]

Fig. 11. Excitation functions of total reaction (stars) and exclusive (squares) and inclusive (triangles) breakups, as well as the total fusion (circles), of ¹⁷F+⁵⁸Ni: the curves denote the theoretical results for corresponding reaction channels, and the arrow indicates the nominal position of the Coulomb barrier, which is approximately 35.4 MeV^[38]

Fig. 12. Measured relative energy (E_rel) distribution (a) and angular correlation (b) for breakup fragments ⁷Be and p from the ⁸B+¹²⁰Sn system at 38.7 MeV: circles denote the experimental data, the solid and dashed curves in panel (a) represent the simulated distributions of E_rel and the contribution of the p-wave 1⁺ state; the squares in panel (b) show the simulation results, and the solid curve denotes the expected β-θ₁₂ correlation assuming asymptotic breakup from the 1⁺ resonance of ⁸B^[37]