Infrared and Laser Engineering, Volume. 54, Issue 4, 20250072(2025)

Status and development of fiber optic hydrogen sensing technology (invited)

Xinpu ZHANG, Xiaotong LI, and Wei PENG
Author Affiliations
  • School of Physics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116000, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(40)
    Schematic diagram of micromirror fiber optic hydrogen sensor[23]
    (a) Response of fiber optic hydrogen sensors with 50 nm Mg70Ti30 as well as 30 nm Pd catalytic layer at 1% hydrogen concentration for different oxygen concentrations[27]; (b) Dual optical path type micromirror fiber optic hydrogen sensor[28]; (c) Response of alloy films before/after annealing at 2% hydrogen concentration[29]; (d) Fiber optic micromirror hydrogen sensor based on Pd/Au alloy[30]
    (a) Hydrogen sensing detection system based on WO3-Pd2Pt-Pt composite thin-film fiber optic micromirrors[31]; (b) Variation of sensor response with increasing hydrogen concentration[31]; (c) Reflective hydrogen sensing system based on polarization modulation[32]
    Schematic diagram of the fiber optic hydrogen sensor based on Mach-Zehnder interferometer[33]
    (a) Schematic of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer-based fiber-optic hydrogen sensor prepared by arc discharge; (b) Transmission spectra of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer hydrogen sensor at 0 (black) and 4% (red dashed) hydrogen concentrations[34]; (c) Schematic of the MZI hydrogen sensor based on a Pd-coated air cavity[35]
    (a) Schematic diagram of the fiber optic device; (b) Microscope picture of the sample; (c) Dip wavelength shifted as a function of H2 concentration, and the inset shows the transmission spectra of the sensor at different H2 concentrations[36]; (d) Schematic diagram of the structure of the MZI hydrogen sensor with nanowires; (e) Sensing performance of the sensor at different H2 concentrations[37]
    Novel MZI hydrogen sensor based on nanopatterned Pd film[38]
    Structure and sensing principle diagram of MZI hydrogen sensor in optical fiber[39]
    (a) Schematic structure of MMF-SMF-MMF-based MZI hydrogen sensor; (b) Variation of MZI sensor coated with Pd-GNF resonance dipping wavelength with different concentrations of H2[40]
    (a) Schematic diagram of exogenous FPI fiber optic hydrogen sensor; (b) Variation of spectral peaks with switching between H2 and N2[42]; (c) Schematic diagram of FP fiber optic hydrogen sensor prepared based on femtosecond laser micromachining; (d) Variation of reflectance spectra with the hydrogen concentration [43]; (e) Fiber optic FP sensor based on Pd/Y thin film[44]
    (a) Schematic of the hydrogen sensor based on a fiber FP cavity with a suspended palladium film; (b) Schematic geometry of the bending properties of the palladium film; (c) Time response and wavelength shift of the sensor at different H2 concentrations[45]; (d) Hydrogen sensor based on a Pd-modified multilayer graphene composite thin-film fiber FP[46]; (e) Schematic of the hydrogen sensor based on the graphene-Au-Pd cantilever; (f) Scanning of the surface of the cantilever electron microscopy (SEM) image; The inset shows the top view of the cantilever surface; (g) Side view of the sensor under the microscope; (h) Response spectra of the sensor at different hydrogen concentrations[47]
    (a) Schematic of nano-photomechanical cavity structure based on Au/Pd composite layer; (b) Schematic of hydrogen sensing principle of fiber-optic nano-photomechanical cavity structure; (c) Durability and repeatability experiments of nano-photomechanical cavity with 6 nm Pd thin film for hydrogen concentration sensing[48]; (d) Schematic of fiber-optic hydrogen sensor based on the principle of optical-force synergistic hydrogen detection; (e) Dynamic hydrogen concentration (0.5%-3.5%-0.5%) response of the sensor corresponding to different Pd nanofilm thicknesses, and the wavelength shifts of the sensors corresponding to different thicknesses at different hydrogen concentrations[49]
    (a) Schematic diagram of hydrogen sensing system based on all-optical photothermal technology; (b) Schematic diagram of photothermal-assisted hydrogen permeation enhancement; (c) Time-response curves of fiber-optic hydrogen sensors at different laser powers[50]; (d) Temperature distributions on the surface of the Pd membrane before and after 405-laser irradiation; (e) Influence of the photothermal effect on the equilibrium of the H-Pd reaction[51]
    (a) Schematic of the process of preparing an FP interferometer using the H-O catalytic bonding technique; (b) Hydrogen response performance of a fiber optic FP interferometer based on a Pd nanofilm[52]
    (a) Schematic of the H2 sensor constructed by dual parallel FPIs; (b) Structural diagram of a single FPI; (c) Schematic cross-section of a single FPI head; (d) Reflectance spectra of the sensing-FPI at different H2 concentrations[53]; (e) Schematic of FP hydrogen sensing based on the Pd nano-cavity-array fiber; (f) Working schematic of the FP hydrogen sensor; (g) SEM characterization of the end face of the FP hydrogen sensor; (h) Reflectance spectra wavelength drift at different H2 concentrations[54]
    (a) Schematic structure of fiber optic hydrogen sensor based on FP combined with FBG[55]; (b) Fiber optic FP hydrogen sensor with transverse offset structure based on SMF; (c) Spectra in air and its upper envelope; (d) Upper envelope spectra at different H2 concentrations; (e) H2 sensitivity fit[56]
    (a) Cross-sectional view as well as side view of the Pd-coated polarization maintaining fibre; (b) Variation of the output transmission spectra of the sensor measured at room temperature with different hydrogen concentrations; (c) Relative wavelength shift and transmission change of the spectral dip for various hydrogen concentrations[57]
    (a) Schematic diagram of Sagnca hydrogen sensor based on polarization-maintaining photonic crystal fiber; (b) Measured wavelength shift versus H2 concentration for three samples with different lengths of polarization-maintaining photonic crystal fiber coating[58]
    (a) Experimental setup of a single Sagnac interference loop hydrogen sensor system; (b) Relationship between envelope shift and hydrogen concentration[59]
    (a) Schematic of the Pd-coated FBG hydrogen sensor; (b) Bragg wavelength of the FBG sensor as a function of hydrogen concentration[61]
    Dual-fiber Bragg grating sensing configuration [63]
    Schematic diagram of the FBG hydrogen sensor with HAF[65]
    (a) Structure of a side-polished FBG hydrogen sensor based on WO3-Pd composite and schematic diagram of the sensing system[66]; (b) Wavelength shift of etched fiber grating at different hydrogen concentrations[67]; (c) Schematic diagram of a fiber grating hydrogen sensor encapsulated in flexible polypropylene material; (d) Hydrogen response of a fiber grating hydrogen sensor at different hydrogen concentrations[68]
    Schematic of the hydrogen sensor configuration with two etched FBGs in cascade[70]
    (a) Typical attenuation spectra of a 0.5 µm period fiber grating exposed to a mixture of pure nitrogen and 4% hydrogen at room temperature; (b) Typical attenuation spectra of a 400 µm period LPG exposed to a mixture of pure nitrogen and 4% hydrogen at room temperature[73]; (c) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup of the hydrogen sensor for a single LPG; (d) Resonance of the sensor when sequentially exposed to 4% hydrogen and 100% nitrogen response at the peak position[74]
    (a) Schematic structure of fiber optic SPR multilayer membrane sensor based on wavelength modulation[78]; (b) Hydrogenation (red line) and dehydrogenation time (black line) of the sensor in 4% H2[79]; (c) Schematic structure of multilayer sensing with Ag/SiO2/PdY multilayer stacks deposited on the fiber core[80]
    Multilayer structure of heterocore fiber SPR hydrogen sensor[81]
    Preparation process of alloy nanostructures and patterning transfer on fiber[82]
    (a) Heterocore fiber LSPR hydrogen sensor based on Pd nanoparticles; (b) Expanded view of the real-time response of the heterocore fiber hydrogen LSPR sensor to optical loss variations, including the response and recovery at 0 and 4% H2 concentrations[83]; (c) Schematic diagram of the fiber optic localized surface plasmon resonance hydrogen detection system based on palladium-coated gold nanoparticles; (d) Sensor response at 0.8% to 4% hydrogen concentration
    (a) Swift-field fiber-optic hydrogen sensor[86]; (b) Structure of swift-field fiber-optic hydrogen sensor based on Pd/WO3 material[87]; (c) Tapered fiber-optic hydrogen sensor based on Pd/GO nanocomposites; (d) Response characteristics of the tapered fiber-optic hydrogen sensor with Pd/GO nanocomposites in the range of 0.125%-2% H2 concentration[89]
    (a) Fiber optic swift field hydrogen sensor with fiber core mismatch structure; (b) Normalized response of the sensor with 10 nm thick Pd/Au film upon repeated exposure to pure nitrogen and 2% or 4% H2 concentration[91]; (c) Fiber optic Bragg grating swift field hydrogen sensor based on Pd nanoparticles; and (d) Variation of the intensity response of the sensor in the range of 1%-5% hydrogen concentration[92]
    • Table 1. Advantages and limitations of various types of hydrogen sensors

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Advantages and limitations of various types of hydrogen sensors

      TypeAdvantagesTypical scenariosLimitation
      CatalyticHigh sensitivity, rapid response, suitable for explosive environmentsIndustrial leakage monitoring (hydrogen storage), safety protection (refueling stations)Catalyst poisoning (e.g., sulfides), short lifespan at high temperatures, requires periodic calibration
      ElectrochemicalHigh selectivity (H2-specific), low detection limit (ppm-level), portableEnvironmental monitoring (trace H2 in air), medical devices (hydrogen therapy), fuel cell system controlElectrolyte aging requires replacement, reduced performance at <0 °C, weak humidity interference resistance
      ResistiveSimple structure, low cost, easy integrationIndustrial process monitoring (chemical plants), ventilation systems (labs, confined spaces)Sensitivity to temperature/humidity, frequent calibration required, poor long-term stability (e.g., Pd hydrogen embrittlement)
      AcousticNon-contact detection, EMI resistance, suitable for high-pressure environmentsHigh-pressure hydrogen tank leakage detection, spacecraft fuel tank monitoringSusceptible to ambient noise, low sensitivity to low-concentration H2, complex signal processing algorithms required
      MechanicalHigh mechanical stability, no external power, extreme temperature toleranceDeep-well drilling (oil/gas field H2 monitoring), nuclear reactor cooling systemsSlow response (seconds), mechanical fatigue limits lifespan, difficult to miniaturize
      Thermal conductivitySuitable for high H2 concentrations (>1%), simple structure, high-temperature resistanceHydrogen purification systems, industrial combustion process monitoringInsufficient sensitivity at low concentrations (<1000 ppm (1 ppm=10-6)), interference from gas mixtures (e.g., CH4, CO2)
      OpticalIntrinsically safe (no sparks), EMI resistance, remote/distributed monitoringFlammable/explosive areas (hydrogen pipelines, chemical plants), long-distance leakage detection (fiber networks)High cost, complex optical system maintenance, significant temperature/humidity compensation required
      Work functionRapid response (millisecond-level), miniaturization potential, low power consumptionPortable H2 detectors, hydrogen fuel cell dynamic control, microelectronic integrated systemsSusceptible to surface contamination (e.g., oil), poor long-term stability, weak EMI resistance
      MagneticBased on H2 magnetic properties, suitable for extreme environments (e.g., high radiation)Nuclear facility H2 monitoring, spacecraft propellant leakage detectionLow technological maturity, limited sensitivity (requires high-purity H2), bulky equipment
    • Table 2. Performance comparison of micromirror-based fiber-optic hydrogen sensors

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Performance comparison of micromirror-based fiber-optic hydrogen sensors

      Hydrogen sensitive materialsDetection concentration rangeOperating temperatureLower detection limitResponse/Recovery time/sReference
      Pd film1%-17%−196-23 ℃1%5/5[24]
      Pd0.92-Y0.08 film0.1%-2%20 ℃-37/34 [29]
      WO3-Pd2Pt-Pt film0.01%-0.5%25 ℃10 ppm20/-[31]
      Pt-WO3 powder0-4%RT1000 ppm30/275[32]
    • Table 3. Performance comparison of MZI fiber optic hydrogen sensors

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Performance comparison of MZI fiber optic hydrogen sensors

      Hydrogen sensitive materialsDetection concentration rangeOperating temperatureLower detection limitResponse/Recovery timeReference
      Pd film4%RT-10 min/10 min[34]
      Pt-WO3 power0-4%RT-120 s/-[36]
      Pd film0-4%20 ℃-20 s/60 s[38]
      Pt-WO3 power0-0.8%22 ℃-38 s/15 s[39]
      Pd-GNF composite material0-1%RT--/-[40]
    • Table 4. Performance comparison of FP fiber optic hydrogen sensors

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Performance comparison of FP fiber optic hydrogen sensors

      Hydrogen sensitive materialsDetection concentration rangeOperating temperatureLower detection limitResponse/Recovery timeReference
      Pd film0.05%-0.5%RT3.3 ppm11 min/11 min[45]
      Graphene-Au-Pd0-1000 ppmRT≤100 ppm31.5 s/-[47]
      Au-Pd film1%-3.5%RT0.1%12 s/1 s[48]
      Suspended Pd nanopore arrays0.02%-0.5%22 ℃1.7 ppm11 min/-[54]
      Pd-WO3 power0-1%RT12.87 ppm-/-[56]
    • Table 5. Performance comparison of Sagnac fiber optic hydrogen sensors

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Performance comparison of Sagnac fiber optic hydrogen sensors

      Hydrogen sensitive materialsDetection concentration rangeOperating temperatureLower detection limitResponse/Recovery timeReference
      Pd film1%-4%RT-90 ℃1%10-12.5 s/60 s[57]
      Pt/WO3 film0-0.8%RT--/-[59]
      Pd particle0-4%70 ℃-20 h/-[60]
    • Table 6. Performance comparison of fiber grating type hydrogen sensors

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. Performance comparison of fiber grating type hydrogen sensors

      Hydrogen sensitive materialsDetection concentration rangeOperating temperatureLower detection limitResponse/Recovery timeReference
      Pd film0.1%-4%21 ℃0.1%30 s/4 min[63]
      Pd film0-10%−150-150 ℃-30 s/-[65]
      Pd/Ni film0-4%23 ℃-4-5 min/-[67]
      Pd film0-4%RT--/-[70]
    • Table 7. Performance comparison of SPR fiber optic hydrogen sensors

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 7. Performance comparison of SPR fiber optic hydrogen sensors

      Hydrogen sensitive materialsDetection concentration rangeOperating temperatureLower detection limitResponse/Recovery timeReference
      Au/SiO2/Pd multilayer films0.5%-4%RT0.5%3 s/10 s[79]
      Pd/Y film0-10%−150-150 ℃-30 s/-[80]
      Pd nanoparticles0-4%RT-1.5 s/3.2 s[83]
      Pd/Au nanoparticles0.8%-4%RT0.086%107 s/126 s[84]
    • Table 8. Performance comparison of swift field fiber optic hydrogen sensors

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 8. Performance comparison of swift field fiber optic hydrogen sensors

      Hydrogen sensitive materialsDetection concentration rangeOperating temperatureLower detection limitResponse/Recovery timeReference
      Pd film0-3.9%RT0.05%10 s/-[88]
      Pd/GO composite coating0.125%-2%RT-200 ℃-48 s/7 min[89]
      PANI/GO/Pd composite material0.125%-2%RT2.51 ppm60 s/190 s[90]
      Pd/Au alloy film0-4%RT-15 s/50 s[91]
      Pd nanoparticle0.3%-5%RT0.3%90 s/140 s[92]
    • Table 9. Performance comparison between hydrogen sensors with different fiber types

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 9. Performance comparison between hydrogen sensors with different fiber types

      Fiber optic hydrogen sensor typesSensitivityPreparation complexityCostTypical applications
      MicromirrorLowLowLowStatic environmental monitoring
      InterferenceHighHighMediumLaboratory high precision testing
      Fiber gratingHighHighMediumIndustrial long-term monitoring (e.g. pipelines)
      Surface plasmon resonanceUltra highUltra highHighUltra-low concentration detection, portable instruments
      Sudden fieldMedium-highLowLowDistributed networks, wearable devices
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xinpu ZHANG, Xiaotong LI, Wei PENG. Status and development of fiber optic hydrogen sensing technology (invited)[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2025, 54(4): 20250072

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Invited review

    Received: Dec. 22, 2024

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: May. 16, 2025

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3788/IRLA20250072

    Topics