Chinese Journal of Ship Research, Volume. 18, Issue 2, 38(2023)

Numerical analysis of impact resistance of honeycomb structures with different Poisson's ratios

Xiaobo GONG, Yuhong LIU, Changli YU, and Hongbin GUI
Author Affiliations
  • School of Ocean Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Weihai), Weihai 264209, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(18)
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    • Table 1. Three types of different Poisson's ratio honeycomb structure and corresponding Poisson's ratio expression

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Three types of different Poisson's ratio honeycomb structure and corresponding Poisson's ratio expression

      蜂窝类型泊松比公式
      六边形蜂窝$\nu = \dfrac{{{{\cos }^2}\theta }}{{(h/l + \sin \theta )\sin \theta }}$
      内凹六边形蜂窝$\nu = - \dfrac{{{{\cos }^2}\theta }}{{(h{\text{/}}l - \sin \theta )\sin \theta }}$
      半内凹六边形蜂窝ν = 0
    • Table 2. Deformation modes of different geometrical honeycomb structures under three impact loads

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Deformation modes of different geometrical honeycomb structures under three impact loads

      t/lθ/(°)六边形蜂窝内凹六边形蜂窝半内凹六边形蜂窝
      V = 10 m/sV = 50 m/sV = 100 m/sV = 10 m/sV = 50 m/sV = 100 m/sV = 10 m/sV = 50 m/sV = 100 m/s
      0.0415123XXX133
      20123X22133
      25123X23333
      30233X33333
      0.0515123X2X133
      20123123333
      25233133333
      30233233333
      0.0615123XX2133
      20233133333
      25233233333
      303X3333333
      0.07152X3XX3333
      20233133333
      25233X33333
      30333333333
    • Table 3. Plateau stress of different geometrical honeycomb structures under three impact loads

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Plateau stress of different geometrical honeycomb structures under three impact loads

      t/lθ(°)平台应力/MPa
      六边形蜂窝内凹六边形蜂窝半内凹六边形蜂窝
      V = 10 m/sV = 50 m/sV = 100 m/sV = 10 m/sV = 50 m/sV = 100 m/sV = 10 m/sV = 50 m/sV = 100 m/s
      0.04151.604.626.121.634.495.991.474.495.99
      201.324.305.821.384.225.761.134.115.63
      251.244.255.681.244.175.621.104.065.49
      301.104.085.531.144.065.521.054.015.46
      0.05151.664.636.101.764.736.201.614.646.11
      201.454.415.951.534.385.891.354.315.85
      251.304.305.721.254.255.671.314.315.73
      301.134.125.611.154.115.641.114.025.53
      0.06151.784.786.301.814.716.221.674.586.14
      201.554.546.101.554.566.121.444.435.91
      251.334.335.811.284.285.771.324.265.76
      301.174.135.621.184.275.771.254.325.82
      0.07151.814.806.321.864.806.301.834.826.32
      201.564.566.061.584.576.071.604.786.26
      251.384.355.841.454.425.911.424.575.92
      301.224.225.651.264.335.671.394.465.85
    • Table 4. Densified strain ofdifferent geometrical honeycomb structures under three impact loads

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Densified strain ofdifferent geometrical honeycomb structures under three impact loads

      t/lθ/(°)致密应变/%
      六边形蜂窝内凹六边形蜂窝半内凹六边形蜂窝
      V = 10 m/sV = 50 m/sV = 100 m/sV = 10 m/sV = 50 m/sV = 100 m/sV = 10 m/sV = 50 m/sV = 100 m/s
      0.041588.393.295.680.284.688.185.287.192.2
      2086.292.195.379.889.894.183.485.790.9
      2584.891.494.779.290.494.483.084.890.0
      3084.290.393.478.986.090.080.382.587.5
      0.051586.692.595.679.590.188.584.386.391.3
      2085.791.895.079.289.493.482.785.089.7
      2585.190.593.186.788.792.882.484.489.4
      3084.190.193.484.686.690.981.483.188.2
      0.061586.592.695.678.384.193.483.985.990.9
      2086.492.795.086.288.292.282.184.089.1
      2584.990.193.184.086.090.081.283.188.1
      3081.087.293.481.283.287.880.582.587.5
      0.071585.388.395.078.080.592.582.484.589.4
      2084.391.794.782.984.988.882.183.989.1
      2583.191.293.177.683.787.879.981.686.9
      3082.789.792.879.981.986.378.780.185.9
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xiaobo GONG, Yuhong LIU, Changli YU, Hongbin GUI. Numerical analysis of impact resistance of honeycomb structures with different Poisson's ratios[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2023, 18(2): 38

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Dec. 31, 2021

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Mar. 20, 2025

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02744

    Topics