Chinese Optics Letters, Volume. 22, Issue 12, 121102(2024)

Pixel-excitation-gating enhanced nonlinear imaging with a GHz femtosecond pulse laser Editors' Pick

Wenlong Wang1, Junpeng Wen1, Yuke Sheng1, Wei Lin1, Chiyi Wei1, Cihang Kong2, Dongdan Chen3, Xiaoming Wei1,3、*, and Zhongmin Yang1,3,4、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Physics and Optoelectronics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
  • 2Institute for Translational Brain Research, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • 3School of Materials Science and Engineering, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research and Development Center of Special Optical Fiber Materials and Devices, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fiber Laser Materials and Applied Techniques, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
  • 4Research Institute of Future Technology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(4)
    The schematic diagram of the pixel-excitation-gating enhanced GHz femtosecond pulse TPE microscope. The pixel-excitation-gating excitation is implemented by modulating the excitation GHz pulse train with an acousto-optic modulator (AOM), which is driven by a modulation waveform signal synchronized to the galvo-based raster scanning. The right bottom inset shows the temporal characteristics of the driven signals for the X-galvo, arbitrary waveform generator (AWG), and AOM. DAQ, data acquisition; PMT, photomultiplier tube; L, lens; Obj, microscope objective; DM, dichroic mirror.
    (a) The lateral resolution of the TPE microscope, measured using 200 nm fluorescent microspheres, under GHz femtosecond pulse TPE. The inset shows the image of a single 200 nm microsphere, averaged from 50 Z-stack frames. TPE images of 3 µm red fluorescent microspheres, excited by (b) GHz femtosecond pulses without pixel-excitation-gating, (c) with pixel-excitation-gating of 50% duty cycle and (d) 25% duty cycle. In the three cases, the same average power of 40 mW is applied. “R” indicates the raw image, while “G” indicates the image processed with a 2-pixel-radius Gaussian filter.
    TPE imaging of the mouse kidney section with a region size of 245 µm × 245 µm, captured (a) without and (b) with pixel-excitation-gating of 25% duty cycle. All the images were captured at a 30 mW average power. (c) and (d) Line plots of the image along the convoluted tubule, as indicated by the yellow lines in (a) and (b), respectively.
    TPE imaging of neurons in a mouse brain slice with a region size of 327 µm × 327 µm, captured (a) without and (b) with pixel-excitation-gating of 25% duty cycle. All the images were captured at a 40 mW average power. “R” denotes the raw images, while “S” denotes the image averaged from 50 raw images. (c) Line plots of the images along the soma (indicated by L1) and dendrites (indicated by L2), as shown in (a) and (b). The solid and dashed lines indicate the cases with and without pixel-excitation-gating, respectively.
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Wenlong Wang, Junpeng Wen, Yuke Sheng, Wei Lin, Chiyi Wei, Cihang Kong, Dongdan Chen, Xiaoming Wei, Zhongmin Yang, "Pixel-excitation-gating enhanced nonlinear imaging with a GHz femtosecond pulse laser," Chin. Opt. Lett. 22, 121102 (2024)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Imaging Systems and Image Processing

    Received: Mar. 10, 2024

    Accepted: Jun. 18, 2024

    Published Online: Jan. 2, 2025

    The Author Email: Xiaoming Wei (xmwei@scut.edu.cn), Zhongmin Yang (yangzm@scut.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/COL202422.121102

    CSTR:32184.14.COL202422.121102

    Topics