[2] Dicken P. Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy[M]. 7th Edition. Los Angeles, USA: Sage(2015).

[3] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Panel[M]. Ecosystem and human well-being: Synthesis(2005).

[4] Liu Jianguo, Dietz T, Carpenter S R et al. Coupled human and natural systems[J]. AMBIO, 36, 593-596(2007).

[5] Kissinger M, Rees W E, Timmer V. Interregional sustainability: Governance and policy in an ecologically interdependent world[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 14, 965-976(2011).

[6] Fridman D, Kissinger M. An integrated biophysical and ecosystem approach as a base for ecosystem services analysis across regions[J]. Ecosystem Services, 31, 242-254(2018).

[7] Kissinger M, Rees W E. An interregional ecological approach for modelling sustainability in a globalizing world: Reviewing existing approaches and emerging directions[J]. Ecological Modelling, 221, 2615-2623(2010).

[8] Gould J. Nutrition: A world of insecurity[J]. Nature, 544, S6-S7(2017).

[9] Liu Jianguo, Hull V, Batistella M et al. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world[J]. Ecology and Society, 18, 26(2013).

[11] Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockstrom J et al. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet[J]. Science, 347, 1259855(2015).

[12] Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems[J]. Science, 325, 419-422(2009).

[13] Liu Jianguo, Hull V, Godfray H C J et al. Nexus approaches to global sustainable development[J]. Nature Sustainability, 1, 466-476(2018).

[14] Sherbinin A D, Vanwey L, Mcsweeney K et al. Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment[J]. Global Environmental Change, 18, 38-53(2008).

[15] Alberti M, Asbjornsen H, Baker L A et al. Research on Coupled Human and Natural Systems (CHANS): Approach, challenges, and strategies[J]. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 92, 218-228(2011).

[16] Turner B L, Kasperson R E, Matson P A et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science[J]. PNAS, 100, 8074-8079(2003).

[17] Moran E F. Environmental social science: Human-environment interactions and sustainability[M]. Hoboken, USA: Wiley-Blackwell(2010).

[18] Walker B, Holling C S, Carpenter S R et al. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in Social-ecological Systems[online]. Ecology and Society, 9, 5(2004). https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/.

[19] Liu Jianguo, McConnell W, Baerwald T et al. Symposium on "Telecoupling of Human and Natural Systems" at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science[online]. http://aaas.confex.com/aaas/2011/webprogram/Session2889.html, 2011

[21] Liu Jianguo. Integration across a metacoupled world[J]. Ecology and Society, 22, 29(2017).

[25] Liu Jianguo, Yang Wu. Integrated assessments of payments for ecosystem services programs[J]. PNAS, 110, 16297-16298(2013).

[26] Liu Jianguo, Mooney H, Hull V et al. Systems integration for global sustainability[J]. Science, 347, 963-972(2015).

[27] Bollmann M, Bosch T, Colijn F et al. World ocean review: Living with the oceans[M]. Hamburg, Germany: Maribus GmbH(2010).

[28] Pichler M, Schaffartzik A, Haberl H et al. Drivers of society-nature relations in the Anthropocene and their implications for sustainability transformations[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 32-36(2017).

[29] Steffen W, Persson A, Deutsch L et al. The anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship[J]. AMBIO, 40, 739-761(2011).

[30] Great Pacific garbage patch-Pacific trash vortex[online]. http://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/great-pacific-garbage-patch/, 2017

[31] Stokols D[M]. Social ecology in the digital age: Solving complex problems in a globalized world, 265-317(2017).

[32] Ti B, Li L, Liu J et al. Global distribution potential and regional environmental risk of F-53B[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 640-641, 1365-1371(2018).

[33] Prospero J M, Mayol-Bracero O L. Understanding the transport and impact of African dust on the Caribbean Basin[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 94, 1329-1337(2013).

[34] Griffin D W, Kellogg C A, Garrison V H et al. The global transport of dust[J]. American Scientist, 90, 228-235(2002).

[36] Hawkins E, Smith R S, Allison L C et al. Bistability of the Atlantic overturning circulation in a global climate model and links to ocean freshwater transport[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 38, 415-421(2011).

[37] Verburg P H, Dearing J A, Dyke J G et al. Methods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene[J]. Global Environmental Change, 39, 328-340(2016).

[38] David H, Anthony M, David G et al[M]. Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture(1999).

[41] Yao G, Hertel T W, Taheripour F. Economic drivers of telecoupling and terrestrial carbon fluxes in the global soybean complex[J]. Global Environmental Change, 50, 190-200(2018).

[42] Wu X D, Guo J L, Han M Y et al. An overview of arable land use for the world economy: From source to sink via the global supply chain[J]. Land Use Policy, 76, 201-214(2018).

[43] Dittrich M, Bringezu S. The physical dimension of international trade: Part 1: Direct global flows between 1962 and 2005[J]. Ecological Economics, 69, 1838-1847(2010).

[44] Schaffartzik A, Mayer A, Gingrich S et al. The global metabolic transition: Regional patterns and trends of global material flows, 1950-2010[J]. Global Environmental Change, 26, 87-97(2014).

[45] Infante-Amate J, Aguilera E, Palmeri F et al. Land embodied in Spain's biomass trade and consumption (1900-2008): Historical changes, drivers and impacts[J]. Land Use Policy, 78, 493-502(2018).

[46] Behrman J, Meinzen-Dick R, Quisumbing A. The gender implications of large-scale land deals[J]. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39, 49-79(2012).

[47] Schutter O D. How not to think of land-grabbing: Three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland[J]. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38, 249-279(2011).

[48] Li T M. Centering labor in the land grab debate[J]. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38, 281-298(2011).

[49] Margulis M E, McKeon N, Borras S M. Land grabbing and global governance: Critical perspectives[J]. Globalizations, 10, 1-23(2013).

[50] White B, Borras S M, Hall R et al. The new enclosures: Critical perspectives on corporate land deals[J]. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39, 619-647(2012).

[51] Newton P, Agrawal A, Wollenberg L. Enhancing the sustainability of commodity supply chains in tropical forest and agricultural landscapes[J]. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1761-1772(2013).

[52] Zimmerer K S, Lambin E F, Vanek S J. Smallholder telecoupling and potential sustainability[J]. Ecology and Society, 23, 30(2018).

[53] Liu Jianguo, Hull V, Luo J et al. Multiple telecouplings and their complex interrelationships[J]. Ecology and Society, 20, 44(2015).

[54] Schröter M, Koellner T, Alkemade R et al. Interregional flows of ecosystem services: Concepts, typology and four cases[J]. Ecosystem Services, 31, 231-241(2018).

[56] Cumming G S, Buerkert A, Hoffmann E M et al. Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services[J]. Nature, 515, 50-57(2014).

[57] Seto K C, Reenberg A, Boone C G et al. Urban land teleconnections and sustainability[J]. PNAS, 109, 7687-7692(2012).

[59] López-Hoffman L, Chester C C, Semmens D J et al. Ecosystem services from transborder migratory species: Implications for conservation governance[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, 509-539(2017).

[60] Semmens D J, Diffendorfer J E, López-Hoffman L et al. Accounting for the ecosystem services of migratory species: Quantifying migration support and spatial subsidies[J]. Ecological Economics, 70, 2236-2242(2011).

[61] Semmens D J, Diffendorfer J E, Bagstad K J et al. Quantifying ecosystem service flows at multiple scales across the range of a long-distance migratory species[J]. Ecosystem Services, 31, 255-264(2018).

[62] Austin J E, Miller M R. Northern pintail (Anas acuta)[M]. The birds of North America. Philadelphia, USA: The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and Washington D C, USA: the American Ornithologists' Union(1995).

[63] Mattsson B J, Runge M C, Devries J H et al. A modeling framework for integrated harvest and habitat management of North American waterfowl: Case-study of northern pintail metapopulation dynamics[J]. Ecological Modelling, 225, 146-158(2012).

[64] Goldstein J H, Thogmartin W E, Bagstad K J et al. Replacement cost valuation of Northern pintail (Anas acuta) subsistence harvest in Arctic and Sub-Arctic North America[J]. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19, 347-354(2014).

[65] Kolosz B W, Athanasiadis I N, Cadisch G et al. Conceptual advancement of socio-ecological modelling of ecosystem services for re-evaluating brownfield land[J]. Ecosystem Services, 33, 29-39(2018).

[66] Fu B J, Wang S, Liu Y et al. Hydrogeomorphic ecosystem responses to natural and anthropogenic changes in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 45, 223-243(2017).

[67] Wang S, Fu B J, Piao S L et al. Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes[J]. Nature Geoscience, 9, 38-41(2016).

[68] Zhao W W, Liu Y, Daryanto S et al. Metacoupling supply and demand for soil conservation service[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 33, 136-141(2018).

[69] Bagstad K J, Johnson G W, Voigt B et al. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 4, 117-125(2013).

[70] Zhao Y, Wei Y P, Wu B F et al. A connectivity-based assessment framework for river basin ecosystem service management[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 33, 34-41(2018).

[71] Arvor D, Meirelles M, Dubreuil V et al. Analyzing the agricultural transition in Mato Grosso, Brazil, using satellite-derived indices[J]. Applied Geography, 32, 702-713(2012).

[72] Zimmerer K S, Carney J A, Vanek S J. Sustainable smallholder intensification in global change? Pivotal spatial interactions, gendered livelihoods, and agrobiodiversity[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 49-60(2015).

[73] Seized: The 2008 land grab for food and financial security [R]. Barcalona,[report]. Spain: GRAIN(2008).

[74] Yang H, Lupi F, Zhang J et al. Feedback of telecoupling: The case of a payments for ecosystem services program[J]. Ecology and Society, 23, 45(2018).

[75] Oberlack C, Tejada L, Messerli P et al. Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials[J]. Global Environmental Change, 41, 153-171(2016).

[76] Crona B I, Holt T V, Petersson M et al. Using social-ecological syndromes to understand impacts of international seafood trade on small-scale fisheries[J]. Global Environmental Change, 35, 162-175(2015).

[77] Chaudhary A, Kastner T. Land use biodiversity impacts embodied in international food trade[J]. Global Environmental Change, 38, 195-204(2016).

[78] Chaudhary A, Carrasco L R, Kastner T. Linking national wood consumption with global biodiversity and ecosystem service losses[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 586, 985-994(2017).

[80] Ibisch P L, Hoffmann M T, Kreft S et al. A global map of roadless areas and their conservation status[J]. Science, 354, 1423-1427(2016).

[81] Koemle D, Zinngrebe Y, Yu X. Highway construction and wildlife populations: Evidence from Austria[J]. Land Use Policy, 73, 447-457(2018).

[82] Schierhorn F, Meyfroidt P, Kastner T et al. The dynamics of beef trade between Brazil and Russia and their environmental implications[J]. Global Food Security, 11, 84-92(2016).

[83] Chen X, Lupi F, Vina A et al. Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services[J]. Conservation Biology, 24, 1469-1478(2010).

[84] Zhang J, Connor T, Yang H et al. Complex effects of natural disasters on protected areas through altering telecouplings[J]. Ecology and Society, 23, 17(2018).

[85] Easter T S, Killion A K, Carter N H. Climate change, cattle, and the challenge of sustainability in a telecoupled system in Africa[J]. Ecology and Society, 23, 10(2018).

[86] Liu Jianguo, Dou Y, Batistella M et al. Spillover systems in a telecoupled Anthropocene: Typology, methods, and governance for global sustainability[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 33, 58-69(2018).

[87] Verburg P H, Crossman N, Ellis E C et al. Land system science and sustainable development of the earth system: A global land project perspective[J]. Anthropocene, 12, 29-41(2015).

[88] Verburg P H, Erb K H, Mertz O et al. Land System Science: Between global challenges and local realities[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 433-437(2013).

[89] Boillat S, Scarpa F M, Robson J P et al. Land system science in Latin America: Challenges and perspectives[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 37-46(2017).

[90] Erb K H, Haberl H, Jepsen M R et al. A conceptual framework for analysing and measuring land-use intensity[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 464-470(2013).

[91] Kuemmerle T, Erb K, Meyfroidt P et al. Challenges and opportunities in mapping land use intensity globally[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 484-493(2013).

[92] Crossman N D, Bryan B A, Groot R S et al. Land science contributions to ecosystem services[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 509-514(2013).

[93] Messerli P, Heinimann A, Giger M et al. From 'land grabbing' to sustainable investments in land: Potential contributions by land change science[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 528-534(2013).

[94] Turner II B L, Lambin E F, Reenberg A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability[J]. PNAS, 104, 20666-20671(2007).

[95] Arvor D, Tritsch I, Barcellos C et al. Land use sustainability on the South-Eastern Amazon agricultural frontier: Recent progress and the challenges ahead[J]. Applied Geography, 80, 86-97(2017).

[96] Friis C, Nielsen J Ø, Otero I et al. From teleconnection to telecoupling: Taking stock of an emerging framework in land system science[J]. Journal of Land Use Science, 11, 131-153(2016).

[97] Global land programme: Science plan and implementation strategy 2016-2021[online]. Bern, Switzerland: Global Land Programme(2016). https://glp.earth/sites/default/files/uploads/glpscienceplan_25_10_16.pdf

[98] Millington J D A, Xiong H, Peterson S et al. Integrating modelling approaches for understanding telecoupling: Global food trade and local land use[J]. Land, 6, 56-74(2017).

[99] Tonini F, Liu J. Telecoupling Toolbox: Spatially explicit tools for studying telecoupled human and natural systems[J]. Ecology and Society, 22, 11(2017).

[100] McCord P, Tonini F, Liu J. The Telecoupling GeoApp: A Web-GIS application to systematically analyze telecouplings and sustainable development[J]. Applied Geography, 96, 16-28(2018).

[101] Lenzen M, Moran D, Kanemoto K et al. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations[J]. Nature, 486, 109-112(2012).

[102] Haberl H, Kastner T, Schaffartzik A et al. Global effects of national biomass production and consumption: Austria's embodied HANPP related to agricultural biomass in the year 2000[J]. Ecological Economics, 84, 66-73(2012).

[103] Bruckner M, Fischer G, Tramberend S et al. Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: A review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods[J]. Ecological Economics, 114, 11-21(2015).

[104] Wiedmann T. A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting[J]. Ecological Economics, 69, 211-222(2009).

[105] Wiedmann T, Wilting H C, Lenzen M et al. Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input-output analysis[J]. Ecological Economics, 70, 1937-1945(2011).

[106] Tukker A, Dietzenbacher E. Global multiregional input-output frameworks: An introduction and outlook[J]. Economic Systems Research, 25, 1-19(2013).

[107] Chen Z M, Chen G Q. Virtual water accounting for the globalized world economy: National water footprint and international virtual water trade[J]. Ecological Indicators, 28, 142-149(2013).

[108] Bruckner M, Giljum S, Lutz C et al. Materials embodied in international trade-Global material extraction and consumption between 1995 and 2005[J]. Global Environmental Change, 22, 568-576(2012).

[109] Brunner P H, Rechberger H. Practical handbook of material flow analysis[J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9, 337-338(2004).

[110] Munksgaard J, Wier M, Lenzen M et al. Using input-output analysis to measure the environmental pressure of consumption at different spatial levels[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9, 169-185(2005).