Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 62, Issue 7, 0722002(2025)

Hybrid Stadium Lighting: Artificial Light Compensation for Natural Illumination

Qing Sun1,2、*, Zhamg Meng2, Ying Yu2, and Xiao Chen1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Architectural Design, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, Shaanxi , China
  • 2Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, Shaanxi , China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(20)
    Monthly average sunshine time/monthly average sunshine time in Xi'an
    Sunshine situations. (a) 9:00 lighting condition; (b) 12:00 lighting condition; (c) 16:30 lighting condition
    Light simulation in a light guide lighting system
    Light distribution curve of the light guide lighting system
    Layout of the light guide lighting system
    Indoor illuminance change curve
    Gray scale iso-illumination map
    Lamp location map
    Response surface of the optimization objectives and some optimization parameters
    Algorithm flowchart
    Pareto solution set
    5000-lx luminaire compensation results
    Response surface optimization design process based on the whale algorithm
    9500‒44500 lx lamp compensation results
    • Table 1. Comparison of the lighting methods

      View table

      Table 1. Comparison of the lighting methods

      Lighting methodEffective lightingGlareLongevity /aNature of the light sourceOccupied areaTransmission distance /m
      Tubular daylightingDirect and scattered lightNone25Illuminated surfaceComparatively large<20
      SkylightsExistIlluminated surfaceLarge
      Optical lightingDirect lightNone10Point sourceComparatively small<60
    • Table 2. Simulation results of the natural light fill interval

      View table

      Table 2. Simulation results of the natural light fill interval

      No.Outdoor illuminance /lxDiffuser luminous flux /lmIndoor illumination /lx
      14500270547
      29500571099
      3145008715152
      41950011720204
      52450014725255
      62950017730308
      73450020735360
      83950023740411
      94450026745463
      104950029750515
    • Table 3. Impact factor level table

      View table

      Table 3. Impact factor level table

      Optimize variableLevel
      -101
      A121518
      B161922
      C131619
      D111417
      E343740
      F232629
    • Table 4. CCD experimental sampling table

      View table

      Table 4. CCD experimental sampling table

      GroupABCDEFEhσ
      11216131134234859182
      21816131134235179017
      31222131134234968275
      418221311342352311367
      51216191134234759000
      618161911342350810185
      71222191134234878390
      818221911342351311402
      91216131734235186547
      101816131734235507358
      821519161437265212481
      831519161437265212481
      841519161437265212481
      851519161437265212491
      861519161437265212481
    • Table 5. Accuracy evaluation parameters

      View table

      Table 5. Accuracy evaluation parameters

      IndexEh /%σ /%
      R299.898.3
      Radj299.797.6
    • Table 6. Comparison before and after optimization

      View table

      Table 6. Comparison before and after optimization

      IndexAverage illuminance/lxMinimum illumination/lxMaximum illumination/lxσUniformity
      Initial value571334674100630.58
      Optimal value49939758522370.80
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Qing Sun, Zhamg Meng, Ying Yu, Xiao Chen. Hybrid Stadium Lighting: Artificial Light Compensation for Natural Illumination[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2025, 62(7): 0722002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Optical Design and Fabrication

    Received: Oct. 14, 2024

    Accepted: Dec. 2, 2024

    Published Online: Apr. 3, 2025

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3788/LOP242100

    CSTR:32186.14.LOP242100

    Topics